Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907, USA.
Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Br J Nutr. 2021 Apr 28;125(8):891-901. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003372. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Food pantries provide free food to individuals at nutritional risk given lack of available foods. Frequent use of food pantries is associated with higher dietary quality; however, neither the nutrient contributions of food pantries to participant diets nor their relationship with household food security are known. This cross-sectional analysis used secondary data from rural food pantry participants, including sociodemographic characteristics, household food security and 24-h recalls. Mean intakes of selected food groups and nutrients from food pantries, supermarkets, other stores and restaurants, and other were compared by one-way ANCOVA. Interaction effects of household food security with food sources were evaluated by two-way ANCOVA. About 40 % of participants' dietary intake came from food pantries. Mean intakes of fibre (P < 0·0001), Na (P < 0·0001), fruit (P < 0·0001), grains (P < 0·0001) and oils (P < 0·0001) were higher from food pantries compared with all other sources, as were Ca (P = 0·004), vitamin D (P < 0·0001) and K (P < 0·0001) from food pantries compared with two other sources. Percentage total energy intake (%TEI) from added sugars (P < 0·0001) and saturated fat (P < 0·0001) was higher from supermarkets than most other sources. Significant interaction effects were observed between food sources and household food security for vegetables (P = 0·01), Na (P = 0·01) and %TEI from saturated fat (P = 0·004), with food-insecure participants having significantly higher intakes from food pantries and/or supermarkets compared with all other sources. Future interventions may incorporate these findings by providing education on purchasing and preparing healthy meals on limited budgets, to complement foods received from pantries, and by reducing Na in pantry environments.
食品储藏室为那些由于缺乏食物而面临营养风险的个人提供免费食品。频繁使用食品储藏室与更高的饮食质量有关;然而,食品储藏室对参与者饮食的营养贡献及其与家庭粮食安全的关系尚不清楚。本横断面分析使用了农村食品储藏室参与者的二次数据,包括社会人口统计学特征、家庭粮食安全和 24 小时回顾法。采用单向方差分析比较了食品储藏室、超市、其他商店和餐馆以及其他来源的特定食物组和营养素的平均摄入量。采用双向方差分析评估了家庭粮食安全与粮食来源的相互作用效应。约 40%的参与者的饮食摄入来自食品储藏室。与所有其他来源相比,食品储藏室的膳食纤维(P < 0·0001)、钠(P < 0·0001)、水果(P < 0·0001)、谷物(P < 0·0001)和油(P < 0·0001)摄入量更高,与其他两个来源相比,食品储藏室的钙(P = 0·004)、维生素 D(P < 0·0001)和 K(P < 0·0001)摄入量也更高。与大多数其他来源相比,来自超市的添加糖(P < 0·0001)和饱和脂肪(P < 0·0001)的总能量摄入百分比(%TEI)更高。在蔬菜(P = 0·01)、钠(P = 0·01)和饱和脂肪的 %TEI(P = 0·004)方面观察到食物来源和家庭粮食安全之间存在显著的相互作用效应,与所有其他来源相比,粮食不安全的参与者从食品储藏室和/或超市摄入的食物明显更多。未来的干预措施可以通过提供有关在有限预算下购买和准备健康膳食的教育,补充从储藏室获得的食物,并减少储藏室环境中的钠,来利用这些发现。