• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of online ordering on food security in a food pantry system in New York City.在线订购对纽约市食品救济站系统中食品安全的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf031.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
7
Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment.积极治疗期间针对癌症患者健康相关生活质量的运动干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD008465. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008465.pub2.
8
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
9
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
10
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Client Experience and Charitable Food Reach and Access at Food Pantries: A Qualitative Study.改善食品分发处的客户体验和慈善食品供应及获取:一项定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2024;35(4S):147-165. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2024.a942874.
2
Age-Specific Differences in Online Grocery Shopping Behaviors and Attitudes among Adults with Low Income in the United States in 2021.2021 年美国低收入成年人的在线食品杂货购物行为和态度的年龄差异。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 21;14(20):4427. doi: 10.3390/nu14204427.
3
Development of new measures to assess household nutrition security, and choice in dietary characteristics.开发新的家庭营养安全评估指标,以及膳食特征的选择。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106288. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Objectively measured chronic disease risk among food pantry patrons.食品储藏室顾客的客观慢性病风险。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Sep;38(5):920-925. doi: 10.1111/phn.12915. Epub 2021 May 28.
5
Needs and Preferences Among Food Pantry Clients.食品储藏室客户的需求和偏好。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Apr 1;18:E29. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200531.
6
The hunger-obesity paradox: Exploring food banking system characteristics and obesity inequities among food-insecure pantry clients.饥饿与肥胖悖论:探究食品银行系统特征与食品不安全食品储藏室客户肥胖之间的不平等关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0239778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239778. eCollection 2020.
7
Nutritional contributions of food pantries and other sources to the diets of rural, Midwestern food pantry users in the USA.食物赈济处和其他来源对美国中西部农村食物赈济处使用者饮食的营养贡献。
Br J Nutr. 2021 Apr 28;125(8):891-901. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003372. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
A review of the food security, diet and health outcomes of food pantry clients and the potential for their improvement through food pantry interventions in the United States.美国食品救济站客户的食品安全、饮食和健康状况回顾以及通过食品救济站干预措施改善这些状况的潜力。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Jun 1;220:112871. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112871. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Food Bank-Based Diabetes Prevention Intervention to Address Food Security, Dietary Intake, and Physical Activity in a Food-Insecure Cohort at High Risk for Diabetes.以食品银行为基础的糖尿病预防干预措施,针对食物不安全且有较高糖尿病患病风险的人群,解决其食物安全、饮食摄入和身体活动问题。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jan 9;17:E04. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190210.
10
Daily Dietary Intake Patterns Improve after Visiting a Food Pantry among Food-Insecure Rural Midwestern Adults.食品匮乏的中西部农村成年人访问食品储藏室后,日常饮食摄入模式有所改善。
Nutrients. 2018 May 9;10(5):583. doi: 10.3390/nu10050583.

在线订购对纽约市食品救济站系统中食品安全的影响。

The impact of online ordering on food security in a food pantry system in New York City.

作者信息

Rummo Pasquale, Yi Stella, Seet Carla, Strahs Leah, Kong Justin, Jebejian Dickran, Elbel Brian

机构信息

Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, College of Medicine, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf031.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibaf031
PMID:40539601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12204695/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online ordering in food pantries may support food security among adults with low socioeconomic status.

PURPOSE

Determine the impact of a transition from in-person ordering to online ordering on the food security status of food pantry clients.

METHODS

For this quasi-experimental study, we recruited participants from Met Council's Kosher Food Network in New York City, including one pantry in Staten Island (intervention) and three pantries in the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn (comparison). The final sample included 114 and 90 adults in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively, at baseline (April-July 2023); and 77 and 58 adults in those groups during follow-up (October-December 2023). Using a six-item survey, we assessed food security status, where scores range from zero to six points and higher points indicate lower food security. Secondary outcomes included nutrition security status, fruit and vegetable intake, and pantry wait time. We used a difference-in-differences approach to assess differences in outcomes between conditions, including testing for differences by age (18-64 vs. ≥65 years).

RESULTS

Food security scores decreased in the intervention and comparison groups over time, with no difference in the decrease between groups (P = .87). Yet, among younger adults in the intervention group, wait time decreased during follow-up, and increased in the comparison group (difference-in-differences = -12.1 minutes (95% CI: -21.9, -2.4); P = .02). We did not observe similar differences among older adults (P = .83), nor significant changes in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The transition to online ordering did not influence food security status among food pantry clients but may help to save time, especially among younger adults.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT05752721.

摘要

背景

食品救济站的在线订购可能有助于改善社会经济地位较低成年人的食品安全状况。

目的

确定从现场订购过渡到在线订购对食品救济站客户食品安全状况的影响。

方法

在这项准实验研究中,我们从纽约市梅特委员会的犹太洁食网络招募参与者,包括斯塔滕岛的一个食品救济站(干预组)和布朗克斯、皇后区和布鲁克林的三个食品救济站(对照组)。最终样本包括干预组和对照组在基线时(2023年4月至7月)分别为114名和90名成年人;随访期间(2023年10月至12月),这两组分别为77名和58名成年人。我们使用六项调查评估食品安全状况,得分范围为0至6分,分数越高表明食品安全状况越差。次要结果包括营养安全状况、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及食品救济站等待时间。我们采用差异中的差异方法来评估不同条件下结果的差异,包括按年龄(18 - 64岁与≥65岁)进行差异检验。

结果

随着时间的推移,干预组和对照组的食品安全得分均下降,两组之间的下降幅度没有差异(P = 0.87)。然而,干预组中的年轻成年人在随访期间等待时间减少,而对照组增加(差异中的差异 = -12.1分钟(95%置信区间:-21.9,-2.4);P = 0.02)。我们在年长成年人中未观察到类似差异(P = 0.83),其他结果也无显著变化。

结论

向在线订购的转变并未影响食品救济站客户的食品安全状况,但可能有助于节省时间,尤其是在年轻成年人中。

临床试验注册

NCT05752721。