Suppr超能文献

社区咖啡馆中食物不安全客人的膳食质量。

Diet Quality of Community Café Meals Among Guests With Food Insecurity.

机构信息

Texas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Dallas, TX.

Texas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Dallas, TX.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Aug;56(8):579-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.04.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare the diet quality of a meal consumed at a community café (café meals), a pay-what-you-can restaurant, to a meal consumed for an equivalent eating occasion on the day before (comparison meal) by guests with food insecurity.

METHODS

Dietary recalls were collected from café guests with food insecurity to determine the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020) total and component scores. Healthy Eating Index-2020 scores were compared between meals using paired-sample t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

Most participants (n = 40; 80% male; 42.5% Black) had very low food security (70.0%). Café meal had a higher HEI-2020 total score (46.7 ± 10.5 vs 34.4 ± 11.6; P < 0.001) and total vegetables (2.6 ± 2.0 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = 0.004), total fruits (2.1 ± 2.2 vs 0.6 ± 1.5; P < 0.001), whole fruits (1.6 ± 2.0 vs 0.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001), and refined grains (7.8 ± 3.5 vs 3.9 ± 3.9; P < 0.001) scores than comparison meals.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The café meal had better diet quality than the comparison meal, suggesting its potential for improving diet quality among guests with food insecurity.

摘要

目的

比较社区咖啡馆(咖啡馆餐)和以同样的就餐场合前一天(对照餐)食物不安全客人所吃餐食的饮食质量。

方法

通过饮食回忆法从食物不安全的咖啡馆客人那里收集数据,以确定健康饮食指数-2020(HEI-2020)总分和各组成部分的分数。使用配对样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较餐食之间的 HEI-2020 评分。

结果

大多数参与者(n=40;80%为男性;42.5%为黑人)的食物安全状况极低(70.0%)。咖啡馆餐的 HEI-2020 总分(46.7±10.5 比 34.4±11.6;P<0.001)和总蔬菜(2.6±2.0 比 1.2±1.7;P=0.004)、总水果(2.1±2.2 比 0.6±1.5;P<0.001)、全水果(1.6±2.0 比 0.3±0.9;P<0.001)和精制谷物(7.8±3.5 比 3.9±3.9;P<0.001)得分均高于对照餐。

结论和意义

咖啡馆餐的饮食质量优于对照餐,这表明其有可能改善食物不安全客人的饮食质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验