Texas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Dallas, TX.
Texas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Dallas, TX.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Aug;56(8):579-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.04.009.
Compare the diet quality of a meal consumed at a community café (café meals), a pay-what-you-can restaurant, to a meal consumed for an equivalent eating occasion on the day before (comparison meal) by guests with food insecurity.
Dietary recalls were collected from café guests with food insecurity to determine the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020) total and component scores. Healthy Eating Index-2020 scores were compared between meals using paired-sample t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Most participants (n = 40; 80% male; 42.5% Black) had very low food security (70.0%). Café meal had a higher HEI-2020 total score (46.7 ± 10.5 vs 34.4 ± 11.6; P < 0.001) and total vegetables (2.6 ± 2.0 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = 0.004), total fruits (2.1 ± 2.2 vs 0.6 ± 1.5; P < 0.001), whole fruits (1.6 ± 2.0 vs 0.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001), and refined grains (7.8 ± 3.5 vs 3.9 ± 3.9; P < 0.001) scores than comparison meals.
The café meal had better diet quality than the comparison meal, suggesting its potential for improving diet quality among guests with food insecurity.
比较社区咖啡馆(咖啡馆餐)和以同样的就餐场合前一天(对照餐)食物不安全客人所吃餐食的饮食质量。
通过饮食回忆法从食物不安全的咖啡馆客人那里收集数据,以确定健康饮食指数-2020(HEI-2020)总分和各组成部分的分数。使用配对样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较餐食之间的 HEI-2020 评分。
大多数参与者(n=40;80%为男性;42.5%为黑人)的食物安全状况极低(70.0%)。咖啡馆餐的 HEI-2020 总分(46.7±10.5 比 34.4±11.6;P<0.001)和总蔬菜(2.6±2.0 比 1.2±1.7;P=0.004)、总水果(2.1±2.2 比 0.6±1.5;P<0.001)、全水果(1.6±2.0 比 0.3±0.9;P<0.001)和精制谷物(7.8±3.5 比 3.9±3.9;P<0.001)得分均高于对照餐。
咖啡馆餐的饮食质量优于对照餐,这表明其有可能改善食物不安全客人的饮食质量。