• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[患者导向与患者参与研究:从患者代表视角看不足、模式与期望]

[Patient orientation and patient participation in research: Deficits, modes and expectations from a patient representative's point of view].

作者信息

Brunsmann Frank

机构信息

Fachbereichsleiter Diagnose und Therapie der PRO RETINA Deutschland e.V., Bonn, Deutschland Sprecher der Patientenvertretung im Unterausschuss Qualitätssicherung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses (im Sprecherteam), Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Nov;156-157:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.003
PMID:32873528
Abstract

The article addresses deficits in patient orientation and patient involvement in medical research from a patient's perspective and provides recommendations for their further development. Researchers often practice patient orientation as well as patient involvement in an unstructured and inconsistent manner. The decision if and how patient involvement takes place is, to a considerable extent, the researchers' responsibility. This decision should always be part of a patient-oriented alignment of the research project, which researchers pursue regardless of the existence, initiative and participation of a patient organization. Possible modes of involvement are assigned to different phases of the research process. In this article, patient orientation and the choice of the form of involvement is considered to constitute an obligation of researchers and decision makers early in the process. Involvement should take place on a fair basis. Decision makers should consider determining specific requirements for patient orientation, e. g. in their calls for proposals or selection/award criteria.

摘要

本文从患者的角度探讨了医学研究中以患者为导向及患者参与方面存在的不足,并为其进一步发展提供了建议。研究人员常常以一种无组织、不一致的方式践行以患者为导向及患者参与。患者是否参与以及如何参与的决策在很大程度上是研究人员的责任。这一决策应始终是研究项目以患者为导向调整的一部分,无论患者组织是否存在、主动参与,研究人员都应追求这一点。可能的参与模式被分配到研究过程的不同阶段。在本文中,以患者为导向及参与形式的选择被视为研究人员和决策者在过程早期的一项义务。参与应在公平的基础上进行。决策者应考虑确定以患者为导向的具体要求,例如在他们的招标书或选择/奖励标准中。

相似文献

1
[Patient orientation and patient participation in research: Deficits, modes and expectations from a patient representative's point of view].[患者导向与患者参与研究:从患者代表视角看不足、模式与期望]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Nov;156-157:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
2
[Kick-off article: Patients first in health care: Status quo].[开篇文章:医疗保健以人为本:现状]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Apr;121:54-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
3
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
[Older patients' involvement in research (INVOLVE-Clin): a study protocol].[老年患者参与研究(INVOLVE-Clin):一项研究方案]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Nov;156-157:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
[Opportunities and challenges of active patient involvement in clinical research in Germany - from the perspectives of a patient representative, a clinical researcher and two staff members of research funding management].[德国患者积极参与临床研究的机遇与挑战——来自患者代表、临床研究人员以及两位研究资助管理工作人员的视角]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Jun;163:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
[Patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines is poor after 12 years of German guideline standards: A review of guideline methodologies].[德国指南标准实施12年后患者在临床实践指南中的参与度较低:指南方法学综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Sep;135-136:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.面向研究人员、患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者的健康领域以患者为导向的研究能力(PORCH):一项范围综述的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 10;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0. eCollection 2020.
9
[Self-help meets science: Patient participation in guideline development].自助与科学相遇:患者参与指南制定
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(4-5):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
10
Patient involvement in clinical trials: motivation and expectations differ between patients and researchers involved in a trial on urinary tract infections.患者参与临床试验:参与尿路感染试验的患者与研究人员的动机和期望存在差异。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Apr 1;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0145-3. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
From Individuals to Systems and Contributions to Creations: Novel Framework for Mapping the Efforts of Individuals by Convening The Center of Health and Health Care.从个体到系统以及对创造的贡献:通过召集健康与医疗保健中心绘制个体努力的新框架
J Particip Med. 2022 Nov 3;14(1):e39339. doi: 10.2196/39339.