• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对来自以色列的植物进行商品风险评估。

Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Civera Antonio Vicent, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Debode Jane, Manceau Charles, de la Peña Eduardo, Gardi Ciro, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Preti Stefano, Potting Roel

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Mar 2;18(3):e06039. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6039. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6039
PMID:32874255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7448033/
Abstract

The EFSA Panel on Plant Health was requested to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in the relevant Implementing Acts as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects' [Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 establishing a provisional list of high risk plants, plant products or other objects, within the meaning of Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031]. The current Scientific Opinion covers all plant health risks posed by bare rooted plants for planting of (1 year old with a stem diameter of less than 2.5 cm) imported from Israel, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Israel by 26 December 2019. The relevance of an EU-quarantine pest for this opinion was based on evidence that: (i) the pest is present in Israel; (ii) is a host of the pest, and (iii) the pest can be associated with the commodity. The relevance of this opinion for other non EU-regulated pests was based on evidence that: (i) the pest is present in Israel (ii) the pest is absent in the EU; (iii) is a host of the pest; (iv) the pest can be associated with the commodity and (v) the pest may have an impact and can pose a potential risk for the EU territory. Two pests (one insect and one fungus, and ) that fulfilled all criteria were selected for further evaluation. For the two selected pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Israel were evaluated. Limiting factors in the effectiveness of the measures were documented. For the selected pests an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment, therefore the Panel is 95% sure that 9,950 or more plants per 10,000 will be free from these two pests.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组被要求针对相关实施法案中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品编制并提供风险评估报告[欧盟委员会实施条例(EU) 2018/2019,确定了条例(EU) 2016/2031第42条所指的高风险植物、植物产品或其他物品的临时清单]。本科学意见涵盖从以色列进口的一年生、茎直径小于2.5厘米的裸根种植用植物所带来的所有植物健康风险,同时考虑了现有科学信息,包括以色列截至2019年12月26日提供的技术信息。一种欧盟检疫性有害生物与本意见的相关性基于以下证据:(i) 该有害生物在以色列存在;(ii) [植物名称]是该有害生物的寄主;(iii) 该有害生物可与该商品相关联。本意见对其他未受欧盟监管的有害生物的相关性基于以下证据:(i) 该有害生物在以色列存在;(ii) 该有害生物在欧盟不存在;(iii) [植物名称]是该有害生物的寄主;(iv) 该有害生物可与该商品相关联;(v) 该有害生物可能产生影响并可能对欧盟领土构成潜在风险。选择了两种符合所有标准的有害生物(一种昆虫和一种真菌,[有害生物名称1]和[有害生物名称2])进行进一步评估。对以色列技术档案中提出的风险缓解措施进行了评估。记录了措施有效性的限制因素。对于选定的有害生物,考虑到针对该有害生物的风险缓解措施,包括评估中存在的不确定性,专家对有害生物无侵染可能性进行了判断,因此小组有95%的把握确定每10000株植物中有9950株或更多将无这两种有害生物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/9f5edccfeb65/EFS2-18-e06039-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/f7e7195381ec/EFS2-18-e06039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/c4f7a7774e10/EFS2-18-e06039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/2fd1b8361d4f/EFS2-18-e06039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/1a4f557b7d4e/EFS2-18-e06039-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/9f5edccfeb65/EFS2-18-e06039-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/f7e7195381ec/EFS2-18-e06039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/c4f7a7774e10/EFS2-18-e06039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/2fd1b8361d4f/EFS2-18-e06039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/1a4f557b7d4e/EFS2-18-e06039-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23d2/7448033/9f5edccfeb65/EFS2-18-e06039-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.对来自以色列的植物进行商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2020 Mar 2;18(3):e06039. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6039. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.来自以色列的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):e05941. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5941. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
Commodity risk assessment of from Israel.来自以色列的商品风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Commodity risk assessment of from Israel.”表述似乎不完整,少了具体所评估的商品内容,但按照要求进行了如上翻译。)
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 3;19(2):e06354. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6354. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 4;19(5):e06568. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6568. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Serbia.塞尔维亚植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2020 May 13;18(5):e06109. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6109. eCollection 2020 May.
6
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2020 Aug 12;18(8):e06225. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6225. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.来自以色列的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06353. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Commodity risk assessment of  spp. plants from New Zealand.来自新西兰的某物种植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2020 May 20;18(5):e06105. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6105. eCollection 2020 May.
9
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Jun 23;19(6):e06665. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6665. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Commodity risk assessment of plants from the UK.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 6;21(7):e08075. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8075. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of black pine ( Parl.) bonsai from Japan.来自日本的黑松(Parl.)盆景的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2019 May 15;17(5):e05667. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5667. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Back to the roots: a reappraisal of .回归根源:对……的重新评估
Persoonia. 2019;43:90-185. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.43.04. Epub 2019 Aug 21.