• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EmojiGrid 作为一种用于评价触觉情感的评分工具。

The EmojiGrid as a rating tool for the affective appraisal of touch.

机构信息

Perceptual and Cognitive Systems, TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands.

Research Group Human Media Interaction, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0237873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237873. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237873
PMID:32877409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7467219/
Abstract

In this study we evaluate the convergent validity of a new graphical self-report tool (the EmojiGrid) for the affective appraisal of perceived touch events. The EmojiGrid is a square grid labeled with facial icons (emoji) showing different levels of valence and arousal. The EmojiGrid is language independent and efficient (a single click suffices to report both valence and arousal), making it a practical instrument for studies on affective appraisal. We previously showed that participants can intuitively and reliably report their affective appraisal (valence and arousal) of visual, auditory and olfactory stimuli using the EmojiGrid, even without additional (verbal) instructions. However, because touch events can be bidirectional and dynamic, these previous results cannot be generalized to the touch domain. In this study, participants reported their affective appraisal of video clips showing different interpersonal (social) and object-based touch events, using either the validated 9-point SAM (Self-Assessment Mannikin) scale or the EmojiGrid. The valence ratings obtained with the EmojiGrid and the SAM are in excellent agreement. The arousal ratings show good agreement for object-based touch and moderate agreement for social touch. For social touch and at more extreme levels of valence, the EmojiGrid appears more sensitive to arousal than the SAM. We conclude that the EmojiGrid can also serve as a valid and efficient graphical self-report instrument to measure human affective response to a wide range of tactile signals.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了一种新的图形自我报告工具(EmojiGrid)在感知触摸事件的情感评估方面的收敛效度。EmojiGrid 是一个用显示不同效价和唤醒水平的面部图标(表情符号)标记的正方形网格。EmojiGrid 与语言无关且高效(只需点击一次即可报告效价和唤醒),使其成为情感评估研究的实用工具。我们之前曾表明,即使没有额外的(口头)说明,参与者也可以使用 EmojiGrid 直观且可靠地报告他们对视觉、听觉和嗅觉刺激的情感评估(效价和唤醒)。然而,由于触摸事件是双向和动态的,这些先前的结果不能推广到触摸领域。在这项研究中,参与者使用经过验证的 9 点 SAM(自我评估曼宁)量表或 EmojiGrid 报告了视频剪辑中不同人际(社交)和基于对象的触摸事件的情感评估。EmojiGrid 和 SAM 获得的效价评分非常吻合。基于对象的触摸的唤醒评分具有良好的一致性,而社交触摸的唤醒评分具有中等一致性。对于社交触摸和更极端的效价水平,EmojiGrid 似乎比 SAM 更能敏感地感知唤醒。我们得出结论,EmojiGrid 也可以作为一种有效且高效的图形自我报告工具,用于测量人类对各种触觉信号的情感反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/cfc00e60f635/pone.0237873.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/51a2863d3b6a/pone.0237873.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/dc732f5305bd/pone.0237873.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/71ada98f746a/pone.0237873.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/f1c168c48b17/pone.0237873.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/92cf9a87684d/pone.0237873.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/cfc00e60f635/pone.0237873.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/51a2863d3b6a/pone.0237873.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/dc732f5305bd/pone.0237873.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/71ada98f746a/pone.0237873.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/f1c168c48b17/pone.0237873.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/92cf9a87684d/pone.0237873.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa92/7467219/cfc00e60f635/pone.0237873.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The EmojiGrid as a rating tool for the affective appraisal of touch.EmojiGrid 作为一种用于评价触觉情感的评分工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0237873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237873. eCollection 2020.
2
Affective rating of audio and video clips using the EmojiGrid.使用 EmojiGrid 对音频和视频片段进行情感评分。
F1000Res. 2020 Aug 11;9:970. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25088.2. eCollection 2020.
3
EmojiGrid: A 2D pictorial scale for cross-cultural emotion assessment of negatively and positively valenced food.EmojiGrid:一种用于评估负面和正面情绪食物的跨文化情感的二维图像量表。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jan;115:541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.049. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
EmojiGrid: A 2D Pictorial Scale for the Assessment of Food Elicited Emotions.表情符号网格:一种用于评估食物引发情绪的二维图像量表。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 28;9:2396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02396. eCollection 2018.
5
Socio-affective touch expression database.社会情感触摸表达数据库。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0190921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190921. eCollection 2018.
6
C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value.C类触觉传入纤维刺激触觉具有积极的情感价值。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173457. eCollection 2017.
7
Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch.触摸中的心灵感应:触觉传达情感的神经生理特异性。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 31;116(Pt A):136-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Everything is worth when it is close to my body: How spatial proximity and stimulus valence affect visuo-tactile integration.当一切贴近我的身体时,一切都值得:空间 proximity 和刺激效价如何影响视觉触觉整合。 (注:proximity 常见释义为“接近;临近” ,这里“spatial proximity” 可理解为“空间接近” ,但原英文表述中此词使用不太准确规范)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
Emotional modulation of touch in alexithymia.躯体感觉忽视症的触觉情绪调节。
Emotion. 2014 Jun;14(3):602-10. doi: 10.1037/a0035888. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
10
Putting a good face on touch: Facial expression reflects the affective valence of caress-like touch across modalities.以良好的面容面对触摸:面部表情反映了跨模态类似爱抚触摸的情感效价。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Sep;137:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Propensity to trust shapes perceptions of comforting touch between trustworthy human and robot partners.信任倾向影响对可信赖的人类和机器人伙伴之间安慰性触摸的感知。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57582-1.
2
Linking Categorical and Dimensional Approaches to Assess Food-Related Emotions.关联分类法与维度法以评估与食物相关的情绪
Foods. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):972. doi: 10.3390/foods11070972.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Enhanced Teleoperation Through Embodiment.通过具身化实现增强型远程操作。
Front Robot AI. 2020 Feb 11;7:14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00014. eCollection 2020.
2
Stroking hardness changes the perception of affective touch pleasantness across different skin sites.抚摸硬度会改变不同皮肤部位对情感触摸愉悦感的感知。
Heliyon. 2019 Aug 12;5(8):e02141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02141. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.潜伏在我们中间的大猩猩:一个在线行为实验构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
4
EmojiGrid: A 2D pictorial scale for cross-cultural emotion assessment of negatively and positively valenced food.EmojiGrid:一种用于评估负面和正面情绪食物的跨文化情感的二维图像量表。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jan;115:541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.049. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
5
EmojiGrid: A 2D Pictorial Scale for the Assessment of Food Elicited Emotions.表情符号网格:一种用于评估食物引发情绪的二维图像量表。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 28;9:2396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02396. eCollection 2018.
6
Putting a good face on touch: Facial expression reflects the affective valence of caress-like touch across modalities.以良好的面容面对触摸:面部表情反映了跨模态类似爱抚触摸的情感效价。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Sep;137:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
Systematic Relations between Affective and Sensory Material Dimensions in Touch.触觉中情感与感觉材料维度之间的系统关系。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):611-622. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2018.2836427. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
The multidimensional representational space of observed socio-affective touch experiences.观察到的社会情感触觉体验的多维表现空间。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Socio-affective touch expression database.社会情感触摸表达数据库。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0190921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190921. eCollection 2018.
10
Affective and non-affective touch evoke differential brain responses in 2-month-old infants.情感和非情感触摸会引起 2 个月大婴儿大脑的不同反应。
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.024. Epub 2017 Dec 11.