• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年两种胰岛素泵和两种连续血糖监测仪的 FDA 不良事件分析。

An Analysis of 2019 FDA Adverse Events for Two Insulin Pumps and Two Continuous Glucose Monitors.

机构信息

Krouwer Consulting, Sherborn, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):228-232. doi: 10.1177/1932296820951872. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1177/1932296820951872
PMID:32880188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8875056/
Abstract

US Food and Drug Administration adverse event data for 2019 were analyzed for two insulin pumps and two continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). The analyses were selective-they were guided by the text described in the adverse events. They included (1) percent using auto mode for the Medtronic 670G pump, (2) distributions of hyper and hypo glucose values for Medtronic and Tandem pumps, (3) a Parkes error grid for Dexcom CGM vs glucose meter when the complaint was inaccuracy, and (4) the most frequent events for Abbott Freestyle. We found that for the 670G pump, there were more hypo events when auto mode was on than when auto mode was off. With Dexcom CGMs, users complained about inaccurate result when most results were in the B zone. With the Abbott Freestyle, the most frequent adverse event was an allergic skin reaction.

摘要

分析了美国食品和药物管理局 2019 年的两份胰岛素泵和两份连续血糖监测仪(CGM)的不良事件数据。这些分析是有选择性的,它们是根据不良事件中描述的文本进行指导的。它们包括:(1)美敦力 670G 泵自动模式的使用率;(2)美敦力和 Tandem 泵高血糖和低血糖值的分布;(3)当投诉不准确时,德康 CGM 与血糖仪的 Parkes 误差网格;(4)雅培自由式的最常见事件。我们发现,对于 670G 泵,自动模式开启时发生低血糖事件的次数多于自动模式关闭时。对于德康 CGM,当大多数结果处于 B 区时,用户抱怨结果不准确。对于雅培自由式,最常见的不良事件是过敏皮肤反应。

相似文献

1
An Analysis of 2019 FDA Adverse Events for Two Insulin Pumps and Two Continuous Glucose Monitors.2019 年两种胰岛素泵和两种连续血糖监测仪的 FDA 不良事件分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):228-232. doi: 10.1177/1932296820951872. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Adverse Event Data for Years 2018 to 2020 for Diabetes Devices.2018 至 2020 年糖尿病设备不良事件数据。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1299-1302. doi: 10.1177/19322968211011688. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Adverse Event Causes From 2022 for Four Continuous Glucose Monitors.2022年四种连续血糖监测仪的不良事件原因
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):80-83. doi: 10.1177/19322968231178525. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Managing Patients with Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitors in the Hospital: to Wear or Not to Wear.在医院中管理使用胰岛素泵和连续血糖监测仪的患者:戴还是不戴。
Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Jan 15;21(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01375-7.
5
Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.使用胰岛素类似物持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的1型糖尿病患者中动态血糖监测系统的临床性能
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):582-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.582.
6
Prolonged use of continuous glucose monitors in children with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intensive multiple-daily injection therapy.在接受持续皮下胰岛素输注或强化每日多次注射治疗的1型糖尿病儿童中长时间使用持续葡萄糖监测仪。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Apr;10(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00476.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
7
Insulin pump risks and benefits: a clinical appraisal of pump safety standards, adverse event reporting, and research needs: a joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group.胰岛素泵的风险与益处:对泵安全标准、不良事件报告和研究需求的临床评估:欧洲糖尿病研究协会和美国糖尿病协会糖尿病技术工作组的联合声明。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):716-22. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0168.
8
Pumps that predict and manage low blood glucose are superior to pumps with stand-alone CGM for reducing hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes patients in a real-world setting.在真实世界环境中,能够预测和管理低血糖的胰岛素泵优于仅具有独立 CGMS 的胰岛素泵,可降低 1 型糖尿病患者的低血糖发生率。
Diabetes Metab. 2021 May;47(3):101168. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
Exercise habits and glucose management among older adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps.使用胰岛素泵的老年1型糖尿病患者的运动习惯与血糖管理
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Jun;59(6):865-868. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01858-3. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
The effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitoring in outpatient adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.持续皮下胰岛素泵联合持续血糖监测在门诊1型糖尿病青少年患者中的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-10. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-170.

引用本文的文献

1
Severe Insulin Pump-Related Adverse Events: Potential Root Causes and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.严重的胰岛素泵相关不良事件:潜在根本原因及新冠疫情的影响
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May 28:19322968241254521. doi: 10.1177/19322968241254521.
2
Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data.基于食品和药物管理局制造商和用户设施设备经验数据评估研究的可重复性。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Aug 1;20(5):e45-e58. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001220. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Adverse Event Causes From 2022 for Four Continuous Glucose Monitors.2022年四种连续血糖监测仪的不良事件原因
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):80-83. doi: 10.1177/19322968231178525. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Continuous Glucose Deviation Interval and Variability Analysis (CG-DIVA): A Novel Approach for the Statistical Accuracy Assessment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.连续血糖偏离间隔和变异性分析(CG-DIVA):一种用于连续血糖监测系统统计准确性评估的新方法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):857-865. doi: 10.1177/19322968221134639. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Insulin Pump-Associated Adverse Events in a Brazilian Reference Center for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Proposal for a Taxonomy of Device Failures in Adults, Adolescents, and Children.巴西糖尿病治疗参考中心胰岛素泵相关不良事件:成人、青少年和儿童设备故障分类法建议
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):74-81. doi: 10.1177/19322968221106196. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Analysis of "Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System".《多中心评价研究:比较新型工厂校准实时连续血糖监测系统与现有瞬态血糖监测系统》分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):214-216. doi: 10.1177/19322968211046026. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
7
Adverse Event Data for Years 2018 to 2020 for Diabetes Devices.2018 至 2020 年糖尿病设备不良事件数据。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1299-1302. doi: 10.1177/19322968211011688. Epub 2021 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Real world hybrid closed-loop discontinuation: Predictors and perceptions of youth discontinuing the 670G system in the first 6 months.真实世界的混合闭环停用:670G 系统在头 6 个月内被年轻人停用的预测因素和看法。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Mar;21(2):319-327. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12971. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
2
One Year Clinical Experience of the First Commercial Hybrid Closed-Loop System.首个商用混合闭环系统的一年临床经验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Dec;42(12):2190-2196. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0855. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Reducing Glucose Meter Adverse Events by Using Reliability Growth With the FDA MAUDE Database.通过利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库中的可靠性增长来减少血糖仪不良事件。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;13(5):959-962. doi: 10.1177/1932296818814457. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
4
Retrospective Analysis of 3-Month Real-World Glucose Data After the MiniMed 670G System Commercial Launch.美敦力 670G 系统商业上市后 3 个月真实世界血糖数据的回顾性分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Oct;20(10):689-692. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0202. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.一种用于评估血糖测量不准确的临床意义的新型共识误差网格。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1143-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143.