Suppr超能文献

同步远程教育与传统教育对卫生科学学生的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Synchronous distance education vs traditional education for health science students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2021 Mar;55(3):293-308. doi: 10.1111/medu.14364. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Synchronous distance education (SDE) has been widely used for health science students in recent years. This study examined the effectiveness and acceptance of SDE compared with traditional education for health science students and explored the potential moderators that could impact the pooled results.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to March 2020 searched on nine electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The outcomes measured were knowledge, skills with objective assessments and overall satisfaction with subjective evaluations. The pooled results were calculated using random-model effects, and moderators were explored through meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of seven RCTs with 594 participants were included. At the post-test level, the pooled effect size of knowledge acquisitions (SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.07-0.32) showed insignificant difference between the SDE and traditional education groups (P = .207), with low heterogeneity (I  = 17.6%). Subgroup analyses observed no factors that significantly impacted the pooled results of knowledge acquisition at the post-test levels (P for interaction > 0.05). Knowledge gains from pretest to post-test in SDE groups also did not differ significantly between groups (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.22-0.53; P = .428). The pooled effect size of skills (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.24-0.28; P = .735) was similarly insignificant. The pooled effect size of overall satisfaction (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.83; P < .001) significantly favoured SDE over traditional education. Incorporating two-group studies without randomisations did not significantly change the overall results of knowledge acquisition at the post-test level (SMD -0.002, 95% CI -0.11-0.10; P = .994), with moderate heterogeneity (I  = 61.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous distance education was not significantly different from traditional education in effectiveness and had higher satisfaction ratings. Our findings might provide indications for adoptions of online remote education in health science education centres.

摘要

背景

近年来,同步远程教育(SDE)已广泛应用于卫生科学专业的学生。本研究比较了 SDE 与传统教育对卫生科学专业学生的效果和接受度,并探讨了可能影响汇总结果的潜在调节因素。

方法

系统检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月在九个电子数据库(包括 Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、EMBASE、CINAHL、ERIC、PsycINFO 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses)中发表的随机对照试验(RCT),进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。测量的结果是知识、客观评估的技能和主观评估的整体满意度。使用随机效应模型计算汇总结果,并通过元回归探索调节因素。

结果

纳入了 7 项 RCT 共 594 名参与者。在测试后水平,知识获取的汇总效应大小(SMD 0.12,95%CI -0.07-0.32)表明 SDE 组和传统教育组之间无显著差异(P = 0.207),异质性较低(I² = 17.6%)。亚组分析未观察到在测试后水平上对知识获取的汇总结果有显著影响的因素(交互作用 P > 0.05)。SDE 组的预测试到测试后的知识增益也无组间差异(SMD 0.15,95%CI -0.22-0.53;P = 0.428)。技能的汇总效应大小(SMD 0.02,95%CI -0.24-0.28;P = 0.735)同样不显著。整体满意度的汇总效应大小(SMD 0.60,95%CI 0.38-0.83;P < 0.001)显著有利于 SDE 优于传统教育。纳入无随机分组的两组研究并没有显著改变测试后知识获取的总体结果(SMD -0.002,95%CI -0.11-0.10;P = 0.994),异质性中度(I² = 61.9%)。

结论

SDE 在效果上与传统教育无显著差异,且满意度评分更高。我们的研究结果可能为卫生科学教育中心采用在线远程教育提供依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验