Suppr超能文献

异步与同步在线教学形式的随机对照试验:培训后知识水平相当,异步在线学习的接受度更高但内在动机更低。

Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning.

作者信息

Zsifkovits Monika, Amplatz Lukas, Triebner Nina, Utz Janine, Kornhuber Johannes, Spitzer Philipp

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Styria, Austrian Red Cross, Merangasse 26, Graz, 8010, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07481-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing importance of online education in recent years has led to an increased focus on implementing and optimizing online learning formats. This study investigated how a lecture delivered in an asynchronous or synchronous online teaching format affects acceptance, intrinsic motivation and knowledge levels after training. The results can be used to optimize online education by identifying format-specific advantages and adapting them to learners' needs.

METHODS

All the Styrian paramedics (N = 5910) were invited to participate in the study and randomly assigned to one of two groups. A total of 1044 participants completed the trial, with one group receiving asynchronous training via a learning platform (N = 545) and the other group participating in synchronous training via webinars (N = 499) providing the same content. After completing a two-hour psychiatric emergency course, the participants were invited to complete a multiple-choice test and a survey assessing acceptance, preferences and intrinsic motivation. Linear regression, t tests and mediation analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The asynchronous training format was significantly more accepted (p <.001) and preferred overall. The participants' preferences depended significantly on the type of learning format (p <.001). The synchronous learning format fostered greater intrinsic motivation (p =.001) and greater perceived autonomy (p <.001) but also a higher level of perceived pressure/tension (p =.003). The analysis revealed no significant difference in test results (p =.449) or perceived competence between the groups (p =.420). Furthermore, the difference in intrinsic motivation was fully mediated by perceived autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There are different advantages and disadvantages to providing a lecture via webinar or online learning platform. Both formats are equally effective in terms of knowledge levels after training, highlighting the importance of adapting teaching strategies to learners' preferences.

摘要

背景

近年来,在线教育的重要性日益凸显,这使得人们越来越关注在线学习形式的实施和优化。本研究调查了以异步或同步在线教学形式授课对培训后接受度、内在动机和知识水平的影响。研究结果可用于通过识别特定形式的优势并使其适应学习者的需求来优化在线教育。

方法

邀请了施蒂里亚州的所有护理人员(N = 5910)参与研究,并将他们随机分为两组。共有1044名参与者完成了试验,一组通过学习平台接受异步培训(N = 545),另一组通过网络研讨会参与同步培训(N = 499),两者提供相同的内容。在完成一门两小时的精神科急诊课程后,邀请参与者完成多项选择题测试以及一项评估接受度、偏好和内在动机的调查。进行了线性回归、t检验和中介分析。

结果

异步培训形式总体上更被接受(p <.001)且更受青睐。参与者的偏好显著取决于学习形式的类型(p <.001)。同步学习形式激发了更强的内在动机(p =.001)和更高的自主感(p <.001),但也带来了更高的压力/紧张感(p =.003)。分析显示两组在测试结果(p =.449)或自我效能感方面没有显著差异(p =.420)。此外,内在动机的差异完全由自主感介导。

结论

通过网络研讨会或在线学习平台授课各有优缺点。两种形式在培训后的知识水平方面同样有效,这突出了使教学策略适应学习者偏好的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/12180198/8d80c4e59347/12909_2025_7481_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验