Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Sleep. 2021 Feb 12;44(2). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa170.
Sleep-tracking devices, particularly within the consumer sleep technology (CST) space, are increasingly used in both research and clinical settings, providing new opportunities for large-scale data collection in highly ecological conditions. Due to the fast pace of the CST industry combined with the lack of a standardized framework to evaluate the performance of sleep trackers, their accuracy and reliability in measuring sleep remains largely unknown. Here, we provide a step-by-step analytical framework for evaluating the performance of sleep trackers (including standard actigraphy), as compared with gold-standard polysomnography (PSG) or other reference methods. The analytical guidelines are based on recent recommendations for evaluating and using CST from our group and others (de Zambotti and colleagues; Depner and colleagues), and include raw data organization as well as critical analytical procedures, including discrepancy analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and epoch-by-epoch analysis. Analytical steps are accompanied by open-source R functions (depicted at https://sri-human-sleep.github.io/sleep-trackers-performance/AnalyticalPipeline_v1.0.0.html). In addition, an empirical sample dataset is used to describe and discuss the main outcomes of the proposed pipeline. The guidelines and the accompanying functions are aimed at standardizing the testing of CSTs performance, to not only increase the replicability of validation studies, but also to provide ready-to-use tools to researchers and clinicians. All in all, this work can help to increase the efficiency, interpretation, and quality of validation studies, and to improve the informed adoption of CST in research and clinical settings.
睡眠追踪设备,特别是在消费者睡眠技术 (CST) 领域,在研究和临床环境中越来越多地被使用,为在高度生态条件下大规模收集数据提供了新的机会。由于 CST 行业的快速发展,再加上缺乏评估睡眠追踪器性能的标准化框架,其在测量睡眠方面的准确性和可靠性在很大程度上仍不清楚。在这里,我们提供了一个评估睡眠追踪器(包括标准活动记录仪)性能的分步分析框架,将其与金标准多导睡眠图 (PSG) 或其他参考方法进行比较。该分析指南基于我们和其他研究小组(de Zambotti 等人;Depner 等人)最近对 CST 的评估和使用建议,包括原始数据的组织以及关键的分析步骤,包括差异分析、Bland-Altman 图和逐时分析。分析步骤附有开源 R 函数(在 https://sri-human-sleep.github.io/sleep-trackers-performance/AnalyticalPipeline_v1.0.0.html 上显示)。此外,还使用经验样本数据集来描述和讨论所提出的分析管道的主要结果。该指南和随附的功能旨在标准化 CST 性能的测试,不仅可以提高验证研究的可重复性,还可以为研究人员和临床医生提供即用型工具。总之,这项工作可以帮助提高验证研究的效率、解释和质量,并促进 CST 在研究和临床环境中的合理应用。