• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程指导能否缩小直接抗病毒药物利用的城乡差距?

Can Telementoring Reduce Urban-Rural Disparities in Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents?

机构信息

Department of Medicine and The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2021 May;27(5):488-494. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2020.0090
PMID:32882154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8112719/
Abstract

Expanding access to direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the national goal for HCV elimination, but important urban-rural disparities exist in DAA use. Evidence is needed to evaluate intervention efforts to reduce urban-rural disparities in DAA utilization. We used Medicare data to compare DAA use between urban HCV patients and rural HCV patients in two states: State A with a telementoring approach to train rural providers to treat HCV patients and State B without such an intervention. We focused on DAA utilization among newly diagnosed HCV patients in 2014-2016 and defined DAA use as filling at least one prescription of DAAs during 2014-2017. We classified patient's urban-rural status based on their ZIP code of residence. We assessed overtime changes in urban-rural disparities in DAA utilization for each state using multivariable cause-specific Cox regression analyses with time-varying hazard ratios. Among 1,872 new HCV patients in State A, 135 (17.00%) rural patients and 243 (22.54%) urban patients received DAAs in 2014-2017. Although there was noticeable urban-rural disparities in DAA use during the first 24 months of follow-up (hazard ratios [HRs] = 0.73 [0.51 to 1.03] for 0-12 months and 0.61 [0.39 to 0.95] for 13-24 months), the disparities became nonsignificant afterward (HR = 1.06 [0.58 to 1.93] after 24 months). Most DAA users in rural areas (94, 70%) in State A received DAAs prescribed by primary care providers (PCPs). In State B, among 8,928 new HCV patients, 227 (18.22%) rural patients and 1,600 (20.83%) urban patients received DAAs in 2014-2017. Rural patients were less likely to receive DAAs over time (HR = 1.12 [0.93 to 1.36] in the first 12 months and HR = 0.62 [0.40 to 0.96] after 24 months). Only 81 (36%) DAA users in rural areas in State B were treated by PCPs. Our study suggests that the telementoring approach may help reduce urban-rural disparities in DAA utilization.

摘要

扩大直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)在治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染方面的可及性是 HCV 消除的国家目标,但在 DAA 使用方面存在重要的城乡差异。需要有证据来评估干预措施,以减少 DAA 使用方面的城乡差距。我们使用医疗保险数据比较了两个州(州 A 和州 B)的城市 HCV 患者和农村 HCV 患者的 DAA 使用情况:州 A 采用远程医疗方法培训农村医生治疗 HCV 患者,而州 B 则没有这种干预措施。我们主要关注 2014-2016 年新诊断的 HCV 患者的 DAA 使用情况,并将 DAA 使用定义为在 2014-2017 年期间至少开具一种 DAA 处方。我们根据患者居住地的邮政编码来确定患者的城乡身份。我们使用具有时变风险比的多变量病因特异性 Cox 回归分析,评估每个州 DAA 使用的城乡差异随时间的变化。在州 A 的 1872 名新 HCV 患者中,2014-2017 年期间,有 135 名(17.00%)农村患者和 243 名(22.54%)城市患者接受了 DAA 治疗。尽管在随访的前 24 个月中,DAA 使用存在明显的城乡差异(0-12 个月时的风险比[HR]为 0.73[0.51 至 1.03],13-24 个月时为 0.61[0.39 至 0.95]),但之后这种差异变得不显著(24 个月后为 HR=1.06[0.58 至 1.93])。州 A 农村地区的大多数 DAA 使用者(94 名,70%)接受了初级保健提供者(PCP)开具的 DAA。在州 B,在 8928 名新 HCV 患者中,2014-2017 年期间,有 227 名(18.22%)农村患者和 1600 名(20.83%)城市患者接受了 DAA 治疗。随着时间的推移,农村患者接受 DAA 的可能性较小(第 12 个月时的 HR 为 1.12[0.93 至 1.36],第 24 个月时的 HR 为 0.62[0.40 至 0.96])。州 B 农村地区仅有 81 名(36%)DAA 使用者接受了 PCP 治疗。我们的研究表明,远程医疗方法可能有助于减少 DAA 使用方面的城乡差距。

相似文献

1
Can Telementoring Reduce Urban-Rural Disparities in Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents?远程指导能否缩小直接抗病毒药物利用的城乡差距?
Telemed J E Health. 2021 May;27(5):488-494. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Changing Urban-Rural Disparities in the Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C in U.S. Medicare Patients, 2014-2017.2014 - 2017年美国医疗保险患者中丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物使用方面城乡差距的变化
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Low Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents in a Large National Cohort of HIV and HCV Coinfected Medicare Patients in the United States: Implications for HCV Elimination.美国大型全国性 HIV 和 HCV 合并感染医疗保险患者队列中直接作用抗病毒药物的低利用率:对 HCV 消除的影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):130-134. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001147.
4
Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Direct-Acting Antivirals Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Hepatitis C, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年,医疗保险受益人群中慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用存在种族/民族和社会经济差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236.
5
Health care utilization and costs associated with direct-acting antivirals for patients with substance use disorders and chronic hepatitis C.与物质使用障碍和慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物相关的医疗保健利用和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10):1388-1402. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1388.
6
Association of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Project With Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among US Adults With Hepatitis C.社区医疗保健结果项目扩展与美国丙型肝炎成人直接抗病毒治疗使用率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15523.
7
Disparities in Initiation of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in an Insured Population.保险人群中丙型肝炎病毒感染直接作用抗病毒药物起始治疗的差异。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):452-460. doi: 10.1177/0033354918772059. Epub 2018 May 11.
8
Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents and Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Dementia and Chronic Hepatitis C.直接作用抗病毒药物的使用与伴有痴呆和慢性丙型肝炎的医疗保险受益人的生存。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):71-83. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200949.
9
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection and risk of incident liver cancer: a retrospective cohort study.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染与肝癌发病风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;47(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1111/apt.14593. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Regional and Rural-Urban Differences in the Use of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus: The Veteran Birth Cohort.区域和城乡之间丙型肝炎病毒直接作用抗病毒药物使用的差异:退伍军人出生队列。
Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):279-285. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001071.

引用本文的文献

1
Provider reported implementation barriers to hepatitis C elimination in Washington State.提供者报告了华盛顿州消除丙型肝炎的实施障碍。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 11;25(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02507-0.
2
Geographic disparities in access to liver transplantation.肝脏移植可及性的地域差异。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Sep 1;29(9):987-997. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000182. Epub 2023 May 29.
3
Can Telemedicine Optimize the HCV Care Cascade in People Who Use Drugs? Features of an Innovative Decentralization Model and Comparison with Other Micro-Elimination Strategies.远程医疗能否优化吸毒人群的丙型肝炎治疗流程?一种创新的去中心化模式的特点以及与其他微消除策略的比较。
Biology (Basel). 2022 May 24;11(6):805. doi: 10.3390/biology11060805.
4
Progress and challenges in the comprehensive management of chronic viral hepatitis: Key ways to achieve the elimination.慢性病毒性肝炎综合管理的进展与挑战:消除的关键途径。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 14;27(26):4004-4017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4004.
5
Association of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Project With Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among US Adults With Hepatitis C.社区医疗保健结果项目扩展与美国丙型肝炎成人直接抗病毒治疗使用率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15523.
6
Effects of COVID-19 on telemedicine practice patterns in outpatient otolaryngology.新冠疫情对耳鼻喉科门诊远程医疗实践模式的影响。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103044. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103044. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Direct-Acting Antivirals Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Hepatitis C, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年,医疗保险受益人群中慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用存在种族/民族和社会经济差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236.
2
Regional and Rural-Urban Differences in the Use of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus: The Veteran Birth Cohort.区域和城乡之间丙型肝炎病毒直接作用抗病毒药物使用的差异:退伍军人出生队列。
Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):279-285. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001071.
3
Hepatitis C Virus Detection and Treatment in Rural Communities.农村社区丙型肝炎病毒的检测与治疗
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018 Dec;14(12):720-722.
4
Project ECHO: democratising knowledge for the elimination of viral hepatitis.ECHO项目:为消除病毒性肝炎实现知识普及。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30390-X.
5
Strategies for the elimination of hepatitis C virus infection as a public health threat in the United States.在美国将丙型肝炎病毒感染作为公共卫生威胁予以消除的策略。
Curr Hepatol Rep. 2018 Jun;17(2):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s11901-018-0394-x. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
6
Hepatitis C Management Simplification From Test to Cure: A Framework for Primary Care Providers.丙型肝炎管理简化:从检测到治愈:基层医疗服务提供者的框架。
Clin Ther. 2018 Aug;40(8):1234-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
7
Absolute Insurer Denial of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C: A National Specialty Pharmacy Cohort Study.保险公司完全拒绝丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗:一项全国专科药房队列研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 7;5(6):ofy076. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy076. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Challenges Facing a Rural Opioid Epidemic: Treatment and Prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C.农村阿片类药物流行所面临的挑战:艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎的治疗和预防。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018 Jun;15(3):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s11904-018-0393-0.
9
Evaluating a Collaborative Approach to Improve Prior Authorization Efficiency in the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus.评估一种协作方法以提高丙型肝炎病毒治疗中预先授权的效率。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2017 Jul/Sep;26(3):136-139. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000137.
10
Expanding Treatment Access for Chronic Hepatitis C with Task-shifting in the Era of Direct-acting Antivirals.在直接作用抗病毒药物时代通过任务转移扩大慢性丙型肝炎的治疗可及性
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017 Jun 28;5(2):130-133. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2016.00059. Epub 2017 Mar 26.