Suppr超能文献

开放目标的形成性评估:一项基于英国社区的多运动家庭计划。

Formative Evaluation of Open Goals: A UK Community-Based Multi-Sport Family Programme.

作者信息

Burton Leanne, Curran Kathryn, Foweather Lawrence

机构信息

Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UX, UK.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;7(9):119. doi: 10.3390/children7090119.

Abstract

Community parks provide opportunities for physical activity (PA) and facilitate social interactions. This formative evaluation assesses the implementation of 'Open Goals' (OG), a novel multi-sport programme aiming to increase family PA and community cohesion, delivered weekly by Liverpool Football Club's charitable foundation to local parks in Liverpool, North West England. Three Open Goals parks were chosen for the evaluation settings. Formative evaluation measures included: System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) observations ( = 10), direct session observations ( = 8), semi-structured interviews with Open Goals coaching staff ( = 3), and informal feedback from families ( = 5) about their experiences of Open Goals. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Within the three evaluation parks, Open Goals reached 107 participants from May-July 2019, through 423 session attendances. Fidelity of the programme was high (M = 69% of session content delivered as intended). Overall park use when OG was offered compared to when it was not offered was not statistically significant ( = 0.051), however, target area use was significantly increased ( = 0.001). Overall physical activity levels in parks were significantly ( = 0.002) higher when Open Goals was being offered, compared to when it was not. Coaches reported that engagement in OG positively affected family co-participation and children's behavioural development. Contextual issues included environmental and social barriers to programme engagement, including the co-participation element of the programme and criticism of the marketing of OG. It is evident that community-based multi-sport PA programmes endorsed by professional football clubs are well positioned to connect with local communities in deprived areas and to encourage PA and community engagement. This study suggests that such programmes may have the ability to improve park usage in specific areas, along with improving physical activity levels among families, although further research is required. Effective marketing strategies are needed for promotional purposes. Upskilling of coaches in the encouragement of family co-participation may support regular family engagement in PA in local parks.

摘要

社区公园为人们提供了进行体育活动(PA)的机会,并促进社交互动。本次形成性评估旨在评估“开放目标”(OG)项目的实施情况,这是一项新颖的多运动项目,旨在增加家庭体育活动和社区凝聚力,由利物浦足球俱乐部慈善基金会每周在英格兰西北部利物浦的当地公园开展。评估选定了三个“开放目标”公园。形成性评估措施包括:社区游戏和娱乐观察系统(SOPARC)观察(n = 10)、课程直接观察(n = 8)、对“开放目标”教练团队的半结构化访谈(n = 3)以及来自家庭的关于他们参与“开放目标”项目体验的非正式反馈(n = 5)。分别对定量和定性数据应用描述性统计和主题分析。在这三个评估公园内,2019年5月至7月期间,“开放目标”项目通过423次课程出勤,吸引了107名参与者。该项目的保真度较高(M = 69%的课程内容按计划交付)。与未提供“开放目标”项目时相比,提供该项目时公园的总体使用率无统计学显著差异(p = 0.051),然而,目标区域的使用率显著增加(p = 0.001)。与未提供“开放目标”项目时相比,提供该项目时公园内的总体体育活动水平显著更高(p = 0.002)。教练们报告称,参与“开放目标”项目对家庭共同参与和儿童行为发展产生了积极影响。背景问题包括项目参与的环境和社会障碍,包括项目的共同参与要素以及对“开放目标”项目营销的批评。显然,由职业足球俱乐部支持的基于社区的多运动体育活动项目,在与贫困地区的当地社区建立联系以及鼓励体育活动和社区参与方面具有良好的定位。本研究表明,此类项目可能有能力改善特定区域的公园使用率,同时提高家庭的体育活动水平,不过还需要进一步研究。为了推广目的,需要有效的营销策略。提高教练在鼓励家庭共同参与方面的技能,可能会支持家庭定期参与当地公园的体育活动。

相似文献

1
Formative Evaluation of Open Goals: A UK Community-Based Multi-Sport Family Programme.
Children (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;7(9):119. doi: 10.3390/children7090119.
3
Corporate social responsibility and mental health: the Premier League football Imagine Your Goals programme.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):460-6. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.924486.
5
Use of a public park for physical activity in the Caribbean: evidence from a mixed methods study in Jamaica.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7247-6.
6
Social and environmental determinants of physical activity in urban parks: Testing a neighborhood disorder model.
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Exploring park director roles in promoting community physical activity.
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jul;9(5):731-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.5.731.
9
10
ParkIndex: Using Key Informant Interviews to Inform the Development of a New Park Access Evaluation Tool.
J Park Recreat Admi. 2019;37(1). doi: 10.18666/JPRA-2019-8926. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

5
Promoting Parent and Child Physical Activity Together: Elicitation of Potential Intervention Targets and Preferences.
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;45(1):112-123. doi: 10.1177/1090198117704266. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Associations between urban greenspace and health-related quality of life in children.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Feb 3;3:211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.01.013. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
Observational Park-based physical activity studies: A systematic review of the literature.
Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:257-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
8
The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 May 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验