Griffin T L, Clarke J L, Lancashire E R, Pallan M J, Adab P
Institute of Applied Health Research, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4690-0.
Increasing prevalence of childhood obesity and its related consequences emphasises the importance of developing and evaluating interventions aimed at prevention. The importance of process evaluation in health intervention research is increasingly recognised, assessing implementation and participant response, and how these may relate to intervention success or failure. A comprehensive process evaluation was designed and undertaken for the West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study that tested the effectiveness of an obesity prevention programme for children aged 6-7 years, delivered in 24 UK schools. The four intervention components were: additional daily school-time physical activity (PA); cooking workshops for children and parents; Villa Vitality (VV), a 6-week healthy lifestyle promotion programme run by a local football club; and signposting to local PA opportunities.
Data relating to six dimensions (Fidelity, Reach, Recruitment, Quality, Participant Responsiveness, Context) were collected via questionnaires, logbooks, direct observations, focus groups and interviews. Multiple data collection methods allowed for data triangulation and validation of methods, comparing research observations with teacher records. The 6-stage WAVES study model ((i) Data collection, (ii) Collation, (iii) Tabulation, (iv) Score allocation and discussion, (v) Consultation, (vi) Final score allocation) was developed to guide the collection, assimilation and analysis of process evaluation data. Two researchers independently allocated school scores on a 5-point Likert scale for each process evaluation dimension. Researchers then discussed school score allocations and reached a consensus. Schools were ranked by total score, and grouped to reflect low, medium or high intervention implementation.
The intervention was predominantly well-implemented and well-received by teachers, parents and children. The PA component was identified as the most challenging, VV the least. Median implementation score across schools was 56/75 (IQR, 51.0 - 60.8). Agreement between teacher logbooks and researcher observations was generally high, the main discrepancies occurred in session duration reporting where in some cases teachers' estimations tended to be higher than researchers'.
The WAVES study model provides a rigorous and replicable approach to undertaking and analysing a multi-component process evaluation. Challenges to implementing school-based obesity prevention interventions have been identified which can be used to inform future trials.
ISRCTN97000586 . 19 May 2010.
儿童肥胖症患病率不断上升及其相关后果凸显了制定和评估预防干预措施的重要性。健康干预研究中过程评估的重要性日益得到认可,它可评估实施情况和参与者的反应,以及这些因素与干预成败的关系。为西米德兰兹地区在校儿童积极生活方式与健康饮食(WAVES)研究设计并开展了一项全面的过程评估,该研究测试了一项针对6至7岁儿童的肥胖预防计划在英国24所学校的有效性。四个干预组成部分为:每天额外的校内体育活动(PA);面向儿童和家长的烹饪工作坊;由当地足球俱乐部开展的为期6周的健康生活方式推广计划“活力别墅”(VV);以及提供当地体育活动机会的信息指引。
通过问卷调查、日志、直接观察、焦点小组和访谈收集与六个维度(保真度、覆盖范围、招募、质量、参与者反应、背景)相关的数据。多种数据收集方法允许进行数据三角互证和方法验证,将研究观察结果与教师记录进行比较。开发了6阶段的WAVES研究模型((i)数据收集,(ii)整理,(iii)制表,(iv)分数分配与讨论,(v)咨询,(vi)最终分数分配)以指导过程评估数据的收集、整合和分析。两名研究人员针对每个过程评估维度,以5分制李克特量表独立为学校打分。研究人员随后讨论学校分数分配并达成共识。学校按总分排名,并分组以反映干预实施的低、中或高程度。
该干预措施总体实施良好,受到教师、家长和儿童的欢迎。体育活动部分被认为是最具挑战性的,而“活力别墅”部分挑战性最小。各学校实施得分中位数为56/75(四分位距,51.0 - 60.8)。教师日志与研究人员观察结果之间的一致性总体较高,主要差异出现在课程时长报告方面,在某些情况下教师的估计往往高于研究人员。
WAVES研究模型为开展和分析多组成部分的过程评估提供了一种严谨且可复制的方法。已确定了实施基于学校的肥胖预防干预措施的挑战,可用于为未来试验提供参考。
ISRCTN97000586。2010年5月19日。