• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉利特试验的检查者内和检查者间可靠性

Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.

作者信息

Meijne W, van Neerbos K, Aufdemkampe G, van der Wurff P

机构信息

Institute for Physical Therapy, Bussum, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jan;22(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70098-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70098-9
PMID:10029942
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.

STUDY DESIGN

In a test-retest study the incidence of asymmetric or symmetric sacroiliac joint motion was investigated with the Gillet test.

METHODS

Forty-one male subjects volunteered for this study (mean age, 23 +/- 2.24 years). Thirty-eight subjects were examined in the first test procedure, and at least 4 days later 37 subjects were examined again. The subjects were subdivided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups on the basis of certain criteria.

RESULTS

To obtain the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability values, Cohen's kappa, the percentage agreement, bias-adjusted kappa, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa were used. The mean Cohen's kappa did not exceed the value of 0.081. Only the percentage agreement of the symptomatic group did exceed the minimum level of 80%. When kappa was positive, the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa was markedly higher than kappa; when kappa was negative, the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa was only slightly higher than kappa. Only small differences were found between kappa and bias-adjusted kappa.

CONCLUSION

The Gillet test, as performed in this study, does not appear to be reliable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定吉列试验的检查者内和检查者间可靠性。

研究设计

在一项重测研究中,采用吉列试验调查骶髂关节不对称或对称运动的发生率。

方法

41名男性受试者自愿参与本研究(平均年龄23±2.24岁)。38名受试者在首次测试程序中接受检查,至少4天后,37名受试者再次接受检查。根据某些标准将受试者分为有症状组和无症状组。

结果

为获得检查者内和检查者间可靠性值,使用了科恩kappa系数、一致性百分比、偏差调整kappa系数和患病率调整偏差调整kappa系数。科恩kappa系数的平均值未超过0.081。只有有症状组的一致性百分比超过了80%的最低水平。当kappa为正时,患病率调整偏差调整kappa系数明显高于kappa系数;当kappa为负时,患病率调整偏差调整kappa系数仅略高于kappa系数。kappa系数和偏差调整kappa系数之间仅发现微小差异。

结论

本研究中所进行的吉列试验似乎不可靠。

相似文献

1
Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.吉利特试验的检查者内和检查者间可靠性
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jan;22(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70098-9.
2
The reliability of multitest regimens with sacroiliac pain provocation tests.骶髂关节疼痛激发试验多测试方案的可靠性
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jan;25(1):42-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.120418.
3
Validity and Reliability of Palpatory Clinical Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Mobility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.触诊性骶髂关节活动度临床检查的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 May;44(4):307-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine.腰椎整脊适应症评估程序可靠性的初步研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jul-Aug;22(6):382-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70083-7.
5
Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.常用于检测慢性下腰痛患者可手法治疗损伤的整脊疗法的可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):231-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106101.
6
Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position.三种将测试结果相结合以确定骶骨受限侧、骶骨基部位置和髋骨位置的方法的检查者间可靠性。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):464-8.
7
Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reproducibility of the Downing Test for Sacroiliac Joint Evaluation of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.唐宁试验在有症状和无症状个体骶髂关节评估中的检查者内和检查者间再现性
J Chiropr Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
8
Inter-rater reliability of diagnostic criteria for sacroiliac joint-, disc- and facet joint pain.骶髂关节、椎间盘及小关节疼痛诊断标准的评分者间信度
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):551-557. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150495.
9
Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节特定运动触诊和疼痛激发试验单项及组合检查者间和检查者内的可靠性
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
10
Inter- and Intraexaminer Reliability in Identifying and Classifying Myofascial Trigger Points in Shoulder Muscles.检查者间及检查者内对肩部肌肉肌筋膜触发点的识别与分类的可靠性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The sacroiliac dysfunction and pain is associated with history of lower extremity sport related injuries.骶髂关节功能障碍和疼痛与下肢运动相关损伤史有关。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 20;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00648-w.
2
Relationship of the mobility of the sacroiliac joint with foot plant pressure.骶髂关节活动度与足底压力的关系。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Jun;33(6):444-449. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.444. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Accuracy of the Diagnostic Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.骶髂关节功能障碍诊断测试的准确性。
J Chiropr Med. 2020 Mar;19(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reproducibility of the Downing Test for Sacroiliac Joint Evaluation of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.唐宁试验在有症状和无症状个体骶髂关节评估中的检查者内和检查者间再现性
J Chiropr Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
5
Reliability and validity of a new clinical test for assessment of the sacroiliac joint dysfunction.一种用于评估骶髂关节功能障碍的新临床测试的可靠性和有效性。
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018 Jun;38(1):13-22. doi: 10.1142/S1013702518500026. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
Does the Gillet test assess sacroiliac motion or asymmetric one-legged stance strategies?吉利特试验评估的是骶髂关节活动还是不对称单腿站立策略?
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2018 Aug;62(2):85-97.
7
The reliability of palpating the posterior superior iliac spine: a systematic review.触诊髂后上棘的可靠性:一项系统评价。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2016 Mar;60(1):36-46.
8
The relation of experience in osteopathic palpation and object identification.整骨触诊经验与目标识别的关系。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Nov 12;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-38.
9
Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation.脊椎按摩师用于确定手法应用部位的方法综述。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 21;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-36.
10
The predictive value of the sacral base pressure test in detecting specific types of sacroiliac dysfunction.骶骨基部压力测试在检测特定类型骶髂关节功能障碍中的预测价值。
J Chiropr Med. 2007 Jun;6(2):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcme.2007.04.003.