College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY, New York, USA.
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2453-2465. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01409-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
In general, memory of highly negative and even traumatic events can distort. However, the effect of misinformation exposure on such memories requires further investigation given the inconsistent past findings. With two experiments, we investigated: (1) whether misinformation distorts memory for highly negative analogue events, (2) whether memory distortion is increased for more emotional and potentially traumatic details compared to unemotional details, and (3) whether repeated misinformation exposure further increases memory distortion for highly negative events compared to single exposure, a possibility that has not been investigated to our knowledge. In both experiments, participants viewed a trauma analogue film with some scenes removed. Twenty-four hours later, they were given three "eyewitness" reports describing the film's events. To manipulate misinformation repetition, either zero, one, or all three of the reports described removed scenes. To determine whether memory distortion is increased for emotional details, half of the removed scenes were more traumatic than the other half. Participants exposed to misinformation falsely remembered more removed scenes compared to participants who were not exposed to misinformation. Further, memory distortion was increased for emotional (vs. unemotional) aspects of the film. Repeated misinformation exposure, however, did not lead to significantly higher error rates compared to single exposure. The lack of perceptual overlap between our written misinformation and film test items may have limited false memories even with repeated misinformation. Alternatively, the repeated vs. single misinformation effect may exist but be very small, as suggested by our raw means and effect sizes.
一般来说,高度负面甚至创伤性事件的记忆可能会发生扭曲。然而,鉴于过去的研究结果不一致,需要进一步研究错误信息暴露对这些记忆的影响。我们通过两个实验研究了以下问题:(1)错误信息是否会扭曲高度负面的模拟事件的记忆;(2)与非情感细节相比,情感和潜在创伤性细节的记忆扭曲是否会增加;(3)与单次暴露相比,重复暴露错误信息是否会进一步增加对高度负面事件的记忆扭曲,据我们所知,这一可能性尚未得到研究。在这两个实验中,参与者观看了一部模拟创伤的电影,其中一些场景被删除了。24 小时后,他们收到了三个“目击者”的报告,描述了电影的事件。为了操纵错误信息的重复,要么零个、一个或三个报告都描述了被删除的场景。为了确定情感细节是否会增加记忆扭曲,一半被删除的场景比另一半更具创伤性。与没有暴露于错误信息的参与者相比,暴露于错误信息的参与者错误地记住了更多被删除的场景。此外,电影的情感(而非非情感)方面的记忆扭曲增加了。然而,与单次暴露相比,重复暴露错误信息并没有导致错误率显著增加。我们的书面错误信息与电影测试项目之间缺乏感知重叠,即使有重复的错误信息,也可能限制虚假记忆。或者,重复与单次错误信息的影响可能存在,但很小,正如我们的原始平均值和效果大小所表明的那样。