Sievwright Olivia, Philipp Michael, Drummond Aaron, Knapp Katie, Ross Kirsty
School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Work-Learn Institute, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 18;9:e12299. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12299. eCollection 2021.
Traditional face-to-face laboratory studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of how misinformation effects develop. However, an area of emerging concern that has been relatively under-researched is the impact of misinformation following exposure to traumatic events that are viewed online. Here we describe a novel method for investigating misinformation effects in an online context. Participants ( = 99) completed the study online. They first watched a 10-min video of a fictional school shooting. Between 5 and 10 days later, they were randomly assigned to receive misinformation or no misinformation about the video before completing a recognition test. Misinformed participants were less accurate at discriminating between misinformation and true statements than control participants. This effect was most strongly supported by ROC analyses (Cohen's = 0.59, BF10 = 8.34). Misinformation effects can be established in an online experiment using candid violent viral-style video stimuli.
传统的面对面实验室研究极大地促进了我们对错误信息影响如何产生的理解。然而,一个相对未得到充分研究的新出现的关注领域是,在网上观看创伤性事件后错误信息的影响。在此,我们描述一种在在线环境中研究错误信息影响的新方法。参与者(n = 99)在线完成研究。他们首先观看一段10分钟的虚构校园枪击视频。在5到10天后,他们在完成识别测试前被随机分配接受关于该视频的错误信息或不接受错误信息。与对照组参与者相比,接收错误信息的参与者在区分错误信息和真实陈述方面的准确性较低。这种效应在ROC分析中得到了最有力的支持(科恩d = 0.59,贝叶斯因子BF10 = 8.34)。使用真实的暴力病毒式视频刺激,可在在线实验中确立错误信息效应。