• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Challenges of Keeping an Intimate Relationship: An Evolutionary Examination.维持亲密关系的挑战:进化视角的考察。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):1474704920953526. doi: 10.1177/1474704920953526.
2
Why People Keep an Intimate Relationship : Investigating Ultimate and Proximate Reasons.人们为何维持亲密关系:探究终极与近端原因。
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):62-81. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09421-9. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
3
What makes It Difficult to keep an Intimate Relationship: Evidence From Greece and China.是什么让维持亲密关系变得困难:来自希腊和中国的证据。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):1474704920987807. doi: 10.1177/1474704920987807.
4
Mating Performance: Assessing Flirting Skills, Mate Signal-Detection Ability, and Shyness Effects.交配表现:评估调情技巧、配偶信号检测能力和羞怯效应。
Evol Psychol. 2019 Jul-Sep;17(3):1474704919872416. doi: 10.1177/1474704919872416.
5
The Association Between Mating Performance, Marital Status, and the Length of Singlehood: Evidence From Greece and China.交配表现、婚姻状况与单身时长之间的关联:来自希腊和中国的证据。
Evol Psychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1474704919887706. doi: 10.1177/1474704919887706.
6
What are Romantic Relationships Good for? An Explorative Analysis of the Perceived Benefits of Being in a Relationship.浪漫关系有什么好处?对恋爱关系中感知到的好处的探索性分析。
Evol Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;21(4):14747049231210245. doi: 10.1177/14747049231210245.
7
I Want Our Relationship to Last: Strategies That People Employ in Order to Improve Their Intimate Relationships.我想让我们的关系持久:人们用来改善亲密关系的策略。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221147154. doi: 10.1177/14747049221147154.
8
What Makes It Difficult to Start an Intimate Relationship: A Taxonomy of the Reasons.难以开启亲密关系的原因:原因分类
Eur J Psychol. 2021 May 31;17(2):103-116. doi: 10.5964/ejop.1852. eCollection 2021 May.
9
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Behavioral Acts That Negatively Affect Relationships' Prospects.我该留还是该走?会对恋爱关系前景产生负面影响的行为举动。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221134220. doi: 10.1177/14747049221134220.
10
Mating Performance and Singlehood Across 14 Nations.14 个国家的交配表现和单身状况。
Evol Psychol. 2023 Jan-Mar;21(1):14747049221150169. doi: 10.1177/14747049221150169.

引用本文的文献

1
The Nature, Taxonomy, and Contingencies of Intimate Relationship Problems.亲密关系问题的本质、分类及意外情况。
Hum Nat. 2025 Mar;36(1):98-120. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09489-7. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
I Want Our Relationship to Last: Strategies That People Employ in Order to Improve Their Intimate Relationships.我想让我们的关系持久:人们用来改善亲密关系的策略。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221147154. doi: 10.1177/14747049221147154.
3
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Behavioral Acts That Negatively Affect Relationships' Prospects.我该留还是该走?会对恋爱关系前景产生负面影响的行为举动。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221134220. doi: 10.1177/14747049221134220.
4
How People Become Attractive to Prospective Mates: Strategies of Self-Promotion in the Greek Cultural Context.人们如何对潜在伴侣具有吸引力:希腊文化背景下的自我推销策略。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Oct;19(4):14747049211045271. doi: 10.1177/14747049211045271.
5
What makes It Difficult to keep an Intimate Relationship: Evidence From Greece and China.是什么让维持亲密关系变得困难:来自希腊和中国的证据。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):1474704920987807. doi: 10.1177/1474704920987807.

本文引用的文献

1
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.伴侣偏好及其行为表现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:77-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
2
When Adaptations Go Awry: Functional and Dysfunctional Aspects of Social Anxiety.当适应出现偏差:社交焦虑的功能与功能失调方面
Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010 Dec;4(1):111-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01019.x.
3
Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices.狩猎采集者婚姻习俗的演化历史。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e19066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019066.
4
Physical aggression and marital dysfunction: a longitudinal analysis.身体攻击行为与婚姻功能障碍:一项纵向分析
J Fam Psychol. 2001 Mar;15(1):135-54. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.15.1.135.
5
Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.性策略理论:关于人类交配的进化视角。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):204-32. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204.

维持亲密关系的挑战:进化视角的考察。

The Challenges of Keeping an Intimate Relationship: An Evolutionary Examination.

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, 121343University of Nicosia, Cyprus.

12478Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):1474704920953526. doi: 10.1177/1474704920953526.

DOI:10.1177/1474704920953526
PMID:32885673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10358406/
Abstract

Keeping an intimate relationship is challenging, and many people face difficulties in doing so. In the current research, we have attempted to identify these difficulties, within the context of an evolutionary theoretical framework. More specifically, by using a combination of qualitative research methods in a sample of 163 Greek-speaking participants, we identified 78 such difficulties. By employing maximum likelihood analysis on the scores of 1,099 Greek-speaking participants, we classified these difficulties in 12 broader factors. The most important factor was "Fading away enthusiasm," followed by "Long work hours" and "Lack of personal time and space." Almost 70% of the participants indicated that at least one factor, and 41% indicated that three or more factors caused them difficulties. Significant sex effects were found for most factors, indicating that men and women differed in the importance they ascribed to these difficulties. Moreover, significant age, marital status and number of children effects were found for several factors.

摘要

维持亲密关系具有挑战性,许多人在这方面都面临困难。在当前的研究中,我们试图在进化理论框架内识别这些困难。更具体地说,通过在 163 名说希腊语的参与者样本中结合使用定性研究方法,我们确定了 78 种这样的困难。通过对 1099 名说希腊语的参与者的分数进行最大似然分析,我们将这些困难分为 12 个更广泛的因素。最重要的因素是“热情消退”,其次是“工作时间长”和“缺乏个人时间和空间”。几乎 70%的参与者表示至少有一个因素,41%的参与者表示三个或更多因素给他们带来了困难。对于大多数因素都发现了显著的性别效应,这表明男性和女性在对这些困难的重视程度上存在差异。此外,对于几个因素还发现了显著的年龄、婚姻状况和子女数量效应。