Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):e1701-e1710. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0577. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Our study describes the feasibility and efficacy of a first-line FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU], folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by de-escalation as a maintenance strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer.
This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from January 2011 to December 2018. FOLFIRINOX de-escalation was defined as stopping oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan after at least four cycles of FOLFIRINOX, without evidence of disease progression. Maintenance schedules were fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (intravenous or oral [capecitabine]), FOLFOX (5FU, oxaliplatin), or FOLFIRI (5FU, irinotecan). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were first progression-free survival (PFS1), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and toxicity.
Among 321 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, 147 (45.8%) were included. Median OS was 16.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7-20.3) and median PFS1 was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.5-10.4). The preferred maintenance regimen was FOLFIRI in 66 (45%) patients versus 5FU monotherapy in 52 (35%) and FOLFOX in 25 (17%) patients. Among 118 patients who received maintenance CT with FOLFIRI or 5FU, there was no difference in PFS1 (median, 9.0 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; p = .33) or OS (median, 16.6 vs. 18.7 months; p = .86) between the two maintenance regimens. Reintroduction of FOLFIRINOX was performed in 20.2% of patients, with a median PFS2 of 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.0-22.3). The rates of grade 3-4 toxicity were significantly higher with FOLFIRI maintenance CT than with 5FU (41% vs. 22%; p = .03), especially for neuropathy (73% vs. 9%).
5FU monotherapy maintenance appeared to be as effective as FOLFIRI, in a FOLFIRINOX de-escalation strategy, which is largely used in France.
FOLFIRINOX de-escalation and maintenance is a feasible strategy in advanced pancreatic cancer that decreases chemotherapy toxicity to improve both survival and quality of life. Survivals in patients with maintenance therapy are clinically meaningful. Fluoropyrimidine monotherapy maintenance seems to be as efficient as FOLFIRI and should be a reference arm in future pancreatic cancer maintenance trials.
我们的研究描述了一线 FOLFIRINOX(5-氟尿嘧啶[5FU]、亚叶酸、伊立替康和奥沙利铂)诱导化疗(CT)后进行降级作为晚期胰腺癌维持治疗策略的可行性和疗效。
这是一项多中心回顾性研究,于 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月进行。FOLFIRINOX 降级定义为在至少接受四个周期 FOLFIRINOX 治疗后停止使用奥沙利铂和/或伊立替康,且无疾病进展证据。维持方案为氟嘧啶单药治疗(静脉或口服[卡培他滨])、FOLFOX(5FU、奥沙利铂)或 FOLFIRI(5FU、伊立替康)。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点是无进展生存期 1(PFS1)、无进展生存期 2(PFS2)和毒性。
在接受 FOLFIRINOX 治疗的 321 名患者中,有 147 名(45.8%)入选。中位 OS 为 16.1 个月(95%CI,13.7-20.3),中位 PFS1 为 9.4 个月(95%CI,8.5-10.4)。首选维持方案为 FOLFIRI(66 例,45%),5FU 单药治疗(52 例,35%)和 FOLFOX(25 例,17%)。在 118 例接受 FOLFIRI 或 5FU 维持 CT 的患者中,PFS1(中位,9.0 与 10.1 个月,分别;p=0.33)或 OS(中位,16.6 与 18.7 个月;p=0.86)在两种维持方案之间无差异。20.2%的患者重新引入 FOLFIRINOX,中位 PFS2 为 2.8 个月(95%CI,2.0-22.3)。FOLFIRI 维持 CT 的 3-4 级毒性发生率明显高于 5FU(41% vs. 22%;p=0.03),尤其是神经毒性(73% vs. 9%)。
在法国,FOLFIRINOX 降级和维持策略中,5FU 单药维持治疗似乎与 FOLFIRI 一样有效,可降低化疗毒性,提高生存质量。维持治疗患者的生存具有临床意义。氟嘧啶单药维持治疗似乎与 FOLFIRI 同样有效,应成为未来胰腺癌维持治疗试验的参考方案。