Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Oct;32(7):726-733. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12635. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
To evaluate the microtensile bond strength of four dental computer-aided design/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) ceramics after application of four different surface treatments.
Four dental CAD/CAM ceramics were tested: feldspathic ceramic (VITABLOCKS-Mark II), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (VITA ENAMIC), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (VITA SUPRINITY), and yttria-stabilized zirconia (VITA YZ T). Four surface treatments were applied: no treatment, 5% hydrofluoric acid-etching, airborne particle abrasion, and tribochemical silica coating. The ceramic blocks were repaired with nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Collection). Sixteen test groups of 12 specimens were prepared. After thermocycling, microtensile bond testing was performed. The microtensile strengths values were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test.
Repaired feldspathic and resin polymer-infiltrated ceramic network ceramics demonstrated superior microtensile bond strengths compared to zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and yttria-stabilized zirconia. Etched feldspathic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network ceramics had higher bond strength than the untreated groups. Surface treatments did not affect the bond strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and yttria-stabilized zirconia with the exception of etching, which reduced the bond strength of yttria-stabilized zirconia.
Feldspathic ceramic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network were repaired with dental composite after surface etching with hydrofluoric acid. Repair of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and yttria-stabilized zirconia did not demonstrate promising results.
Repair of feldspathic ceramic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations may be a cost-effective means to promote the longevity of dental restorations. However, zirconia and zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate restorations do not offer such an option.
评估四种牙科计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)陶瓷在应用四种不同表面处理方法后的微拉伸结合强度。
测试了四种牙科 CAD/CAM 陶瓷:长石陶瓷(VITABLOCKS-Mark II)、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(VITA ENAMIC)、氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷(VITA SUPRINITY)和氧化钇稳定氧化锆(VITA YZ T)。应用了四种表面处理方法:无处理、5%氢氟酸蚀刻、气固颗粒喷砂和化学气相沉积硅烷涂层。陶瓷块用纳米复合树脂(Tetric N-Collection)修复。制备了 16 个 12 个样本的测试组。热循环后,进行微拉伸结合测试。使用双向方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验对微拉伸强度值进行统计分析。
修复后的长石陶瓷和树脂聚合物渗透陶瓷网络陶瓷的微拉伸结合强度明显优于氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷和氧化钇稳定氧化锆陶瓷。经蚀刻的长石陶瓷和聚合物渗透陶瓷网络陶瓷的结合强度高于未处理组。除了蚀刻降低了氧化钇稳定氧化锆的结合强度外,表面处理方法对氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷和氧化钇稳定氧化锆的结合强度没有影响。
经氢氟酸蚀刻表面处理后,用牙科复合树脂修复长石陶瓷和聚合物渗透陶瓷网络。修复氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷和氧化钇稳定氧化锆的效果并不理想。
修复长石陶瓷和聚合物渗透陶瓷网络修复体可能是一种经济有效的方法,可以延长牙科修复体的使用寿命。然而,氧化锆和氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷修复体则不提供这种选择。