Suppr超能文献

四种不同 CAD-CAM 聚合物渗透陶瓷材料在热循环后的微剪切粘结强度评价。

Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Four Different CAD-CAM Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Materials after Thermocycling.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Graduate student, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;31(7):623-628. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13469. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the bond strength of three monolithic hybrid ceramics/resin nanoceramics and a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate to resin cement after thermocycling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using four materials, including Vita Enamic (VITA Zahnfabrik), Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE), Crystal Ultra (Digital Dental), and Vita Suprinity (VITA Zahnfabrik), 64 specimens were prepared with dimensions of 4 mm × 3 mm × 1.5 mm. Vita Suprinity samples were sintered at 840°C for 8 min. After polishing and cleaning all the samples in each group (n = 16), they were subjected to their recommended surface treatment: 10% hydrofluoric acid for Vita Enamic (60s) and Vita Suprinity (20s); air abrasion of Lava Ultimate and Crystal Ultra with 50 u Al O particles. Then, tygon tubes were filled with dual cure resin cement (Panavia F2.0), cured and then subjected to thermal cycling (2000 cycles; 5-55°C). The microshear bond strength was measured using microtensile testing machine. The data were analyzed using Welch and Games-Howell tests (α = 0.05). The mode of failure was also evaluated using a stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

The highest and the lowest mean microshear bond strength belonged to the Crystal Ultra (7.71 ± 1.54 MPa) and Vita Suprinity (4.73 ± 1.87 MPa) groups, respectively. The differences between groups were significant and Crystal Ultra had higher bond strength in comparison to all three materials (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid ceramics showed higher bond strength to resin cements in comparison to resin nanoceramics and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate materials.

摘要

目的

评估三种整体式混合陶瓷/树脂纳米陶瓷和氧化锆增强锂硅酸钠对树脂水泥的粘结强度,经过热循环处理。

材料和方法

使用四种材料,包括 Vita Enamic(VITA Zahnfabrik)、Lava Ultimate(3M ESPE)、Crystal Ultra(Digital Dental)和 Vita Suprinity(VITA Zahnfabrik),制备 64 个尺寸为 4mm×3mm×1.5mm 的试件。Vita Suprinity 样品在 840°C 下烧结 8 分钟。在对每组(n=16)中的所有样本进行抛光和清洁后,对它们进行推荐的表面处理:10%氢氟酸用于 Vita Enamic(60s)和 Vita Suprinity(20s);Lava Ultimate 和 Crystal Ultra 采用 50uAlO 颗粒进行空气喷砂处理。然后,将 Tygon 管充满双固化树脂水泥(Panavia F2.0),固化后进行热循环(2000 次循环;5-55°C)。使用微拉伸试验机测量微剪切粘结强度。使用 Welch 和 Games-Howell 检验(α=0.05)分析数据。使用立体显微镜评估失效模式。

结果

最高和最低平均微剪切粘结强度分别属于 Crystal Ultra(7.71±1.54MPa)和 Vita Suprinity(4.73±1.87MPa)组。组间差异显著,Crystal Ultra 与所有三种材料相比具有更高的粘结强度(p<0.05)。

结论

与树脂纳米陶瓷和氧化锆增强锂硅酸钠材料相比,混合陶瓷对树脂水泥具有更高的粘结强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验