Vásconez Jeanneth, Pero-Gascon Roger, Giménez Estela, Benavente Fernando
Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Research on Nutrition and Food Safety (INSA·UB), University of Barcelona, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Research on Nutrition and Food Safety (INSA·UB), University of Barcelona, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Talanta. 2020 Nov 1;219:121263. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121263. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
This study evaluates zwitterionic-hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography (capZIC-HILIC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) with ultraviolet (UV) and mass spectrometry (MS) detection for the direct, label-free and multiplex analysis of microribonucleic acids (miRNAs). CapZIC-HILIC-UV and CE-UV methods were first optimized, resulting in similar separations for a mixture of three miRNAs (hsa-iso-miR-16-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, and hsa-miR-21-5p) but with reversal of elution/migration orders and small differences in repeatability, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and separation efficiency. The established UV methods were transferred and validated in these terms with mass spectrometry (MS) detection, which allowed identifying the miRNAs and characterizing their post-transcriptional modifications. LOD by capZIC-HILIC-MS was 1 μM of miRNA, around 5 times lower than by CE-MS due to the analyte dilution with the sheathflow CE-MS interface and to the slightly increased abundance of alkali metals adducts in the CE-MS mass spectra. In addition, the suction effect promoted by the nebulizer gas in CE-MS negatively affected the already compromised separations. In contrast, CE-MS showed superior repeatabilities with spiked serum samples, as well as reduced costs, extended capillary column durabilities and shorter conditioning times. The comparison of the different methods allows disclosing the current advantages and disadvantages of capZIC-HILIC and CE for the analysis of miRNA biomarkers.
本研究评估了两性离子亲水相互作用毛细管液相色谱法(capZIC-HILIC)和毛细管电泳法(CE),并结合紫外(UV)和质谱(MS)检测,用于对微小核糖核酸(miRNA)进行直接、无标记和多重分析。首先对CapZIC-HILIC-UV和CE-UV方法进行了优化,对于三种miRNA(hsa-iso-miR-16-5p、hsa-let-7g-5p和hsa-miR-21-5p)的混合物实现了相似的分离效果,但洗脱/迁移顺序相反,且在重复性、线性、检测限(LOD)和分离效率方面存在细微差异。已建立的UV方法在这些方面通过质谱(MS)检测进行了转移和验证,从而能够鉴定miRNA并表征其转录后修饰。capZIC-HILIC-MS的LOD为1 μM miRNA,比CE-MS低约5倍,这是由于鞘流CE-MS接口对分析物的稀释以及CE-MS质谱图中碱金属加合物的丰度略有增加。此外,CE-MS中雾化气体产生的抽吸效应负面影响了本就不佳的分离效果。相比之下,CE-MS在加标血清样品中表现出更好的重复性,同时成本更低、毛细管柱耐用性更强且平衡时间更短。对不同方法的比较有助于揭示capZIC-HILIC和CE在分析miRNA生物标志物方面当前的优缺点。