Suppr超能文献

具有部分激动剂活性的β受体阻滞剂降低血压的时间进程。

Time course for blood pressure lowering of beta-blockers with partial agonist activity.

作者信息

Zhang Xiao-Yin, Soufi Sam, Dormuth Colin, Musini Vijaya M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 5;9(9):CD010054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010054.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are commonly used in the treatment of hypertension. We do not know whether the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy of beta-blockers varies across the day. This review focuses on the subclass of beta-blockers with partial agonist activity (BBPAA).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the degree of variation in hourly BP lowering efficacy of BBPAA over a 24-hour period in adults with essential hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for relevant studies up to June 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register; CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 5; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought to include all randomised and non-randomised trials that assessed the hourly effect of BBPAA by ambulatory monitoring, with a minimum follow-up of three weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the included trials and extracted the data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Outcomes included in the review were end-point hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR), measured using a 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen non-randomised baseline controlled trials of BBPAA met our inclusion criteria, but only seven studies, involving 121 participants, reported hourly ambulatory BP data that could be included in the meta-analysis. Beta-blockers studied included acebutalol, pindolol and bopindolol. We judged most studies at high or unclear risk of bias for selection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias. We judged the overall certainty of the evidence to be very low for all outcomes. We analysed and presented data by each hour post-dose. Very low-certainty evidence showed that hourly mean reduction in BP and HR visually showed an attenuation over time. Over the 24-hour period, the magnitude of SBP lowering at each hour ranged from -3.68 mmHg to -17.74 mmHg (7 studies, 121 participants), DBP lowering at each hour ranged from -2.27 mmHg to -9.34 mmHg (7 studies, 121 participants), and HR lowering at each hour ranged from -0.29 beats/min to -10.29 beats/min (4 studies, 71 participants). When comparing between three 8-hourly time intervals that correspond to day, evening, and night time hours, BBPAA was less effective at lowering BP and HR at night, than during the day and evening. However, because we judged that these outcomes were supported by very low-certainty evidence, further research is likely to have an important impact on the estimate of effect and may change the conclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to draw general conclusions about the degree of variation in hourly BP-lowering efficacy of BBPAA over a 24-hour period, in adults with essential hypertension. Very low-certainty evidence showed that BBPAA acebutalol, pindolol, and bopindolol lowered BP more during the day and evening than at night. However, the number of studies and participants included in this review was very small, further limiting the certainty of the evidence. We need further and larger trials, with accurate recording of time of drug intake, and with reporting of standard deviation of BP and HR at each hour.

摘要

背景

β受体阻滞剂常用于治疗高血压。我们尚不清楚β受体阻滞剂的降压疗效在一天中是否存在差异。本综述聚焦于具有部分激动剂活性的β受体阻滞剂(BBPAA)这一亚类。

目的

评估原发性高血压成人患者中,BBPAA在24小时内每小时的降压疗效变化程度。

检索方法

Cochrane高血压信息专家检索了以下数据库以查找截至2020年6月的相关研究:Cochrane高血压专业注册库;CENTRAL;2020年第5期;MEDLINE Ovid;Embase Ovid;世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台;以及ClinicalTrials.gov。我们还联系了相关论文的作者以获取更多已发表和未发表的研究。检索无语言限制。

入选标准

我们试图纳入所有通过动态监测评估BBPAA每小时效果的随机和非随机试验,最短随访期为三周。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立选择纳入的试验并提取数据。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。综述纳入的结局包括使用24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)设备测量的终点每小时收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)以及心率(HR)。

主要结果

14项BBPAA的非随机基线对照试验符合我们的纳入标准,但只有7项研究(涉及121名参与者)报告了可纳入荟萃分析的每小时动态血压数据。所研究的β受体阻滞剂包括醋丁洛尔、吲哚洛尔和波吲洛尔。我们判断大多数研究在选择偏倚、失访偏倚和报告偏倚方面存在高风险或不确定风险。我们判断所有结局的证据总体确定性非常低。我们按给药后每小时分析并呈现数据。极低确定性证据表明,每小时血压和心率的平均降低在视觉上随时间衰减。在24小时期间,每小时SBP降低幅度为-3.68 mmHg至-17.74 mmHg(7项研究,121名参与者),每小时DBP降低幅度为-2.27 mmHg至-9.34 mmHg(7项研究,121名参与者),每小时HR降低幅度为-0.29次/分钟至-10.29次/分钟(4项研究,71名参与者)。在对应白天、傍晚和夜间的三个8小时间隔进行比较时,BBPAA在夜间降低血压和心率的效果不如白天和傍晚。然而,由于我们判断这些结局得到的是极低确定性证据的支持,进一步的研究可能会对效应估计产生重要影响,并可能改变结论。

作者结论

对于原发性高血压成人患者中BBPAA在24小时内每小时降压疗效的变化程度,尚无足够证据得出一般性结论。极低确定性证据表明,醋丁洛尔、吲哚洛尔和波吲洛尔在白天和傍晚比夜间降压效果更好。然而,本综述纳入的研究和参与者数量非常少,进一步限制了证据的确定性。我们需要进一步的大规模试验,准确记录药物摄入时间,并报告每小时血压和心率的标准差。

相似文献

6
Effect of alcohol on blood pressure.酒精对血压的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD012787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012787.pub2.
8
Pharmacotherapy for hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients.高血压患者高尿酸血症的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 2;9(9):CD008652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008652.pub4.
9
Renal denervation for resistant hypertension.肾动脉去神经术治疗耐药性高血压。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):CD011499. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011499.pub3.
10
Walking for hypertension.高血压的步行运动疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 24;2(2):CD008823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008823.pub2.

本文引用的文献

7
Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension.高血压的晚间与晨间给药方案药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD004184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004184.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验