Discipline of Podiatry and La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia; School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia.
Discipline of Podiatry and La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Dec;28(12):1514-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
To determine how foot structure and lower limb function differ between individuals with and without midfoot osteoarthritis (OA).
Electronic databases were searched from inception until May 2020. To be eligible, studies needed to (1) include participants with radiographically confirmed midfoot OA, with or without midfoot symptoms, (2) include a control group of participants without radiographic midfoot OA or without midfoot symptoms, and (3) report outcomes of foot structure, alignment, range of motion or any measures of lower limb function during walking. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent assessors, with disagreements resolved by a third independent assessor. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.
A total of 1,550 records were screened by title and abstract and 11 met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative synthesis indicated that individuals who had midfoot OA had a more pronated foot posture, greater first ray mobility, less range of motion in the subtalar joint and first metatarsophalangeal joints, longer central metatarsals and increased peak plantar pressures, pressure time integrals and contact times in the heel and midfoot during walking. Meta-analysis could not be performed as the data were not sufficiently homogenous.
There are several differences in foot structure and lower limb function between individuals with and without midfoot OA. Future research with more consistent case definitions and detailed biomechanical models would further our understanding of potential mechanisms underlying the development of midfoot OA.
确定有和没有中足骨关节炎(OA)的个体之间足部结构和下肢功能的差异。
从创建到 2020 年 5 月,电子数据库进行了搜索。符合条件的研究需要:(1) 包括经影像学证实的中足 OA 患者,无论是否有中足症状,(2) 包括一个无影像学中足 OA 或无中足症状的对照组,以及 (3) 报告足部结构、对齐、运动范围或任何行走时下肢功能的测量结果。筛选和数据提取由两名独立评估员进行,如果存在分歧,则由第三名独立评估员解决。使用美国国立卫生研究院的观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
通过标题和摘要筛选出 1550 条记录,其中 11 条符合纳入标准。定量综合表明,患有中足 OA 的个体足部姿势更旋前,第一跖骨活动性更大,距下关节和第一跖趾关节活动范围更小,中间跖骨更长,足跟着地和中足的峰值跖骨压力、压力时间积分和接触时间在行走时增加。由于数据不够同质,无法进行荟萃分析。
有和没有中足 OA 的个体之间,足部结构和下肢功能存在一些差异。未来的研究如果有更一致的病例定义和详细的生物力学模型,将进一步了解中足 OA 发展的潜在机制。