Department of Community Health.
Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):660-666. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000732.
The objective of this study was to assess sexual minority and heterosexual survivors' perceived quality of cancer care and identify demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics associated with patient-centered quality of care.
Four cancer registries provided data on 17,849 individuals who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer an average of 3 years prior and resided in predetermined diverse geographic areas. A questionnaire, which queried about sexual orientation and other eligibility criteria was mailed to all cancer survivors. Of these, 480 eligible survivors participated in a telephone survey. Quality of cancer care was defined by 3 measures of interpersonal care (physician communication, nursing care, and coordination of care) and by rating cancer care as excellent. We used generalized linear models and logistic regression with forward selection to obtain models that best explained each quality of care measure.
Sexual minority survivors rated physician communication, nursing care, and coordination of care similarly to heterosexual survivors, yet a significantly higher percentage of sexual minority survivors rated the overall quality of their cancer care as excellent (59% vs. 49%). Sexual minority survivors' greater likelihood of reporting excellent care remained unchanged after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics.
Sexual minority survivors' ratings of quality of colorectal cancer care were comparable or even higher than heterosexual survivors. Sexual minority survivors' reports of excellent care were not explained by their interpersonal care experiences.
本研究旨在评估性少数群体和异性恋幸存者对癌症护理的感知质量,并确定与以患者为中心的护理质量相关的人口统计学、临床和心理社会特征。
四个癌症登记处提供了 17849 名平均在 3 年前被诊断为 I 期、II 期或 III 期结直肠癌且居住在预先确定的多样化地理区域的个体的数据。向所有癌症幸存者邮寄了一份问卷,询问其性取向和其他资格标准。其中,480 名符合条件的幸存者参加了电话调查。癌症护理质量通过 3 项人际护理措施(医生沟通、护理和护理协调)和将癌症护理评为优秀来定义。我们使用广义线性模型和逐步向前选择的逻辑回归来获得最佳解释每种护理质量测量的模型。
性少数群体幸存者对医生沟通、护理和护理协调的评价与异性恋幸存者相似,但有更高比例的性少数群体幸存者认为他们的整体癌症护理质量非常好(59%对 49%)。在调整了人口统计学、临床和心理社会特征后,性少数群体幸存者报告的优质护理的可能性仍然不变。
性少数群体幸存者对结直肠癌护理质量的评价与异性恋幸存者相当,甚至更高。性少数群体幸存者对优质护理的报告不能用他们的人际护理体验来解释。