University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita (Dr Ablah, Mr Kellogg, Dr Okut); Kansas Health Foundation (Mr Usher), Wichita; Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Health Promotion, Topeka (Mr Lester), Kansas.
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):724-727. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001947.
The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a comprehensive worksite-level assessment and identify which worksite wellness best practices were implemented following a workshop.
Kansas worksites attended a WorkWell Kansas Phase I workshop from 2012 through 2014 and completed a 155-item assessment before the workshop and 1 year later. Cronbach alpha measured the internal consistency of the WorkWell KS Phase I Assessment, and McNemar test assessed differences in proportions from baseline to follow-up.
Two hundred eighty five worksites completed a baseline assessment, of which, 109 completed the follow-up assessment (32%). The internal consistency of the instrument was 0.96, and worksites reported significant improvements at follow-up from baseline for nine variables.
Improvements predominantly included creating a wellness committee, assessing needs, and developing goals. There was a lack of policy and systems level improvements at the worksite.
本研究旨在确定全面的工作场所评估的可靠性，并确定在研讨会后实施了哪些工作场所健康最佳实践。
堪萨斯州的工作场所参加了 2012 年至 2014 年的 WorkWell Kansas 第一阶段研讨会，并在研讨会之前和 1 年后完成了 155 项评估。克朗巴赫 α 衡量了 WorkWell KS 第一阶段评估的内部一致性，McNemar 检验评估了从基线到随访的比例差异。
285 个工作场所完成了基线评估，其中 109 个完成了随访评估（32%）。该工具的内部一致性为 0.96，工作场所报告在随访时在九个变量上的表现优于基线。
改进主要包括创建一个健康委员会、评估需求和制定目标。工作场所缺乏政策和系统层面的改进。
