• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在初级保健和急诊护理环境中,直接获得物理治疗的护理模式对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响:一项叙述性综述]

[Impact of models of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care and emergency care contexts in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A narrative review].

作者信息

Demont A, Quentin J, Bourmaud A

机构信息

Inserm 1123 ECEVE, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France; École universitaire de kinésithérapie, université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.

Pôle Saint-Hélier, centre de médecine physique et réadaptation, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Sep;68(5):306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.respe.2020.08.001
PMID:32893028
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders are increasing in prevalence, principally due to sedentary behaviors. Strong evidence supports an early need for first-line treatment including physiotherapy. New and innovative models in primary and emergency care have been drawn up and put the physiotherapist's skills to work in early and first-line management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The objectives of this review were to identify and describe studies assessing models of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care and in emergency care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders and to provide perspectives on the application of these two models in France.

METHODS

A literature review was carried out including studies extracted from four scientific databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro. The selected articles had to address the clinical effectiveness or efficiency of these models for the provision of care in primary or in emergency care. A narrative literature review method was used. The synthesis deals with the qualitative analysis of the included studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included in this review: 19 on assessment of the direct access to physiotherapy model in primary care and 20 on the direct access to physiotherapy model in emergency departments as concerns patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The studies showed that the different models incorporating direct access to physiotherapy in primary or in emergency care provided better outcomes in terms of quality and access to care while maintaning a similar degree of safety. However, the methodology of the studies included was estimated as being of heterogeneous quality.

CONCLUSION

The studies dealing with the new models for provision of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care or emergency care impart two lessons: (1) they are not designed to replace the physician; (2) collaboration between different health professionals aimed at improving patients' access to efficient care is to be encouraged. It would be worthwhile to focus upon dissemination factors that would enhance the efficiency of these innovative models in other countries, as in France.

摘要

背景

肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率正在上升,主要原因是久坐行为。有力证据表明,早期就需要包括物理治疗在内的一线治疗。已经制定了初级和急诊护理中的新型创新模式,并将物理治疗师的技能应用于肌肉骨骼疾病患者的早期和一线管理。本综述的目的是识别和描述评估在初级护理和急诊护理中为肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供直接物理治疗的护理模式的研究,并就这两种模式在法国的应用提供观点。

方法

进行了一项文献综述,包括从四个科学数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和PEDro)中提取的研究。所选文章必须涉及这些模式在初级或急诊护理中提供护理的临床有效性或效率。采用叙述性文献综述方法。综合分析涉及对纳入研究的定性分析。

结果

本综述纳入了39项研究:19项评估初级护理中直接物理治疗模式,20项评估急诊科针对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的直接物理治疗模式。研究表明,在初级或急诊护理中纳入直接物理治疗的不同模式在护理质量和可及性方面提供了更好的结果,同时保持了相似的安全程度。然而,纳入研究的方法学质量估计参差不齐。

结论

涉及在初级护理或急诊护理中提供直接物理治疗的新型护理模式的研究有两点启示:(1)它们并非旨在取代医生;(2)应鼓励不同卫生专业人员之间的合作,以改善患者获得高效护理的机会。值得关注传播因素,以提高这些创新模式在其他国家(如法国)的效率。

相似文献

1
[Impact of models of care integrating direct access to physiotherapy in primary care and emergency care contexts in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A narrative review].[在初级保健和急诊护理环境中,直接获得物理治疗的护理模式对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响:一项叙述性综述]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Sep;68(5):306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
The impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to primary care physician led usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature.直接获得物理治疗与初级保健医生主导的常规护理相比,对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响:文献系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(12):1637-1648. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1674388. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain.系统评价和非医学分诊、自我转诊和直接就诊服务对肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的证据综合。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235364. eCollection 2020.
4
STEMS pilot trial: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the addition of patient direct access to physiotherapy to usual GP-led primary care for adults with musculoskeletal pain.STEMS试点试验:一项试点整群随机对照试验,旨在研究在由全科医生主导的常规初级护理基础上,增加患者直接获得物理治疗服务,用于治疗患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 12;7(3):e012987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012987.
5
Cost-Effectiveness and Outcomes of Direct Access to Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders Compared to Physician-First Access in the United States: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接接受物理治疗治疗肌肉骨骼疾病与美国先看医生的方式相比的成本效益和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2021 Jan 4;101(1). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa201.
6
Primary contact physiotherapy in emergency departments can reduce length of stay for patients with peripheral musculoskeletal injuries compared with secondary contact physiotherapy: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial.急诊科初级接触理疗与二级接触理疗相比,可减少外周肌骨骼损伤患者的住院时间:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。
Physiotherapy. 2011 Jun;97(2):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
7
Reducing strain on primary healthcare systems through innovative models of care: the impact of direct access physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions-an interrupted time series analysis.通过创新的医疗模式减轻基层医疗系统负担:肌肉骨骼疾病直接就诊物理治疗的影响——一项中断时间序列分析。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Sep 24;12(3):e002998. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002998.
8
Improving general practitioner access to physiotherapy: a review of the economic evidence.改善全科医生获得物理治疗服务的途径:经济证据综述。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1997 Nov;10(4):225-30. doi: 10.1177/095148489701000403.
9
Physiotherapy-as-first-point-of-contact-service for patients with musculoskeletal complaints: understanding the challenges of implementation.针对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的物理治疗作为首诊服务:理解实施过程中的挑战。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Mar;19(2):121-130. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000615. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
10
Direct-access physiotherapy to help manage patients with musculoskeletal disorders in an emergency department: Results of a randomized controlled trial.直接通道物理治疗在急诊科管理肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;28(8):848-858. doi: 10.1111/acem.14237. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiotherapists' perspectives on the implementation of direct access to physiotherapy services in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯物理治疗师对直接获得物理治疗服务实施情况的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):e089601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089601.
2
Rehabilitation in emergency departments: A regional scan and future opportunities.急诊科的康复治疗:区域调查与未来机遇
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 May;38(3):263-272. doi: 10.1177/08404704241292240. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Reply to Moretti et al. Would Moving Forward Mean Going Back? Comment on "Maselli et al. Direct Access to Physical Therapy: Should Italy Move Forward? 2022, , 555".
回复 Moretti 等人:向前推进是否意味着倒退?评“Maselli 等人:物理治疗的直接通道:意大利是否应该向前推进?2022 年,……,555”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084620.
4
Can Haglund's Syndrome Be Misdiagnosed as Low Back Pain? Findings from a Case Report in Physical Therapy Direct Access.Haglund综合征会被误诊为腰痛吗?物理治疗直接问诊病例报告的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;9(5):508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050508.