Moffatt Fiona, Goodwin Rob, Hendrick Paul
1Assistant Professor,School of Health Sciences,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK.
2Doctoral Student,School of Medicine,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Mar;19(2):121-130. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000615. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Primary care faces unprecedented challenges. A move towards a more comprehensive, multi-disciplinary service delivery model has been proposed as a means with which to secure more sustainable services for the future. One seemingly promising response has been the implementation of physiotherapy self-referral schemes, however there is a significant gap in the literature regarding implementation. Aim This evaluation aimed to explore how the professionals and practice staff involved in the delivery of an in-practice physiotherapy self-referral scheme understood the service, with a focus on perceptions of value, barriers and impact. Design and setting A qualitative evaluation was conducted across two UK city centre practices that had elected to participate in a pilot self-referral scheme offering 'physiotherapy-as-a-first-point-of-contact' for patients presenting with a musculoskeletal complaint.
Individual and focus group interviews were conducted amongst participating physiotherapists, administration/reception staff, general practitioners (GPs) and one practice nurse (in their capacity as practice partner). Interview data were collected from a total of 14 individuals. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Three key themes were highlighted by this evaluation. First, the imperative of effecting a cultural change - including management of patient expectation with particular reference to the belief that GPs represented the 'legitimate choice', re-visioning contemporary primary care as a genuine team approach, and the physiotherapists' reconceptualisation of their role and practices. Second, the impact of the service on working practice across all stakeholders - specifically re-distribution of work to 'unburden' the GP, and the critical role of administration staff. Finally, beliefs regarding the nature and benefits of physiotherapeutic musculoskeletal expertise - fears regarding physiotherapists' ability to work autonomously or identify 'red flags' were unfounded.
This qualitative evaluation draws on the themes to propose five key lessons which may be significant in predicting the success of implementing physiotherapy self-referral schemes.
基层医疗面临前所未有的挑战。有人提议转向更全面、多学科的服务提供模式,以此为未来确保更具可持续性的服务。一种看似有前景的应对措施是实施物理治疗自我转诊计划,然而关于实施方面的文献存在重大空白。目的 本评估旨在探讨参与实施门诊物理治疗自我转诊计划的专业人员和实践工作人员如何理解该服务,重点关注对价值、障碍和影响的看法。设计与设置 对英国两个市中心诊所进行了定性评估,这两个诊所选择参与一项试点自我转诊计划,为出现肌肉骨骼问题的患者提供“物理治疗作为第一接触点”服务。
对参与的物理治疗师、行政/接待人员、全科医生(GP)和一名执业护士(以其作为实践伙伴的身份)进行了个人访谈和焦点小组访谈。共收集了来自14个人的访谈数据。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
本次评估突出了三个关键主题。第一,实现文化变革的必要性——包括管理患者期望,特别是关于认为全科医生是“合法选择”的观念,将当代基层医疗重新构想为真正的团队方法,以及物理治疗师对其角色和实践的重新概念化。第二,该服务对所有利益相关者工作实践的影响——特别是工作的重新分配以“减轻”全科医生的负担以及行政人员的关键作用。最后,关于物理治疗肌肉骨骼专业知识的性质和益处的看法——对物理治疗师自主工作或识别“危险信号”能力的担忧是没有根据的。
本次定性评估利用这些主题提出了五个关键经验教训,这可能对预测实施物理治疗自我转诊计划的成功具有重要意义。