Suppr超能文献

健康论坛和 Twitter 在痴呆症研究中的应用:机遇与考量。

Health Forums and Twitter for Dementia Research: Opportunities and Considerations.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2881-2889. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16790. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Social media platforms are promising sources for large quantities of participant-driven research data and circumvent some common challenges when conducting dementia research. This study provides a summary of key considerations and recommendations about using these platforms as research tools for dementia.

DESIGN

Mixed methods.

SETTING

Alzheimer's Society's online Dementia Talking Point forum from inception to April 17, 2018, and Twitter in February and March 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

All users of Dementia Talking Point who posted in subforums labeled "I have dementia" and "I care for a person with dementia," and Twitter users whose posts contained the keywords "dementia," "Alzheimer," or "Alzheimer's."

MEASUREMENTS

We quantified the average daily number of dementia-related posts on each platform and number of words per post. Guided by a codebook, we conducted thematic content analysis of 5% of the 15,513 posts collected from Dementia Talking Point, and 10% of the 25,948 comprehensible posts from Twitter containing "dementia," "Alzheimer," or "Alzheimer's." We also summarized research-relevant characteristics inherent to platforms and posts.

RESULTS

On average, Dementia Talking Point provided less than two new daily dementia-related posts with 213.5 to 241.5 words, compared with 7,883 new daily Twitter posts with 14.5 words. Persons with dementia (PWDs) commonly shared dementia-related concerns (75.7%), experiences (68.6%), and requests for, as well as offers of, information and support (44.3% and 38.6%, respectively). Caregivers commonly shared caregiving experience (67.0%) and requests for information and support (52.5%). Most common dementia-related Twitter posts were derogatory use of the term dementia (14.5%), advocacy, fundraising, and awareness (11.6%), and research dissemination (8.0%). Recommendations about these platforms' unique technical and ethical considerations are outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the priorities of PWDs and their caregivers remains important to understand how clinicians can best support them. This study will help clinicians and researcher to better leverage online health forums and Twitter for such dementia-related information.

摘要

背景/目的:社交媒体平台是获取大量参与者驱动的研究数据的有前景的来源,并规避了进行痴呆症研究时的一些常见挑战。本研究总结了使用这些平台作为痴呆症研究工具的一些关键考虑因素和建议。

设计

混合方法。

设置

从 2018 年 4 月 17 日开始,在阿尔茨海默氏症协会的在线痴呆症讨论点论坛上以及 2018 年 2 月和 3 月在 Twitter 上。

参与者

在“我患有痴呆症”和“我照顾患有痴呆症的人”子论坛中发布的所有痴呆症讨论点的用户,以及在 Twitter 上发布的包含“痴呆症”,“阿尔茨海默氏症”或“阿尔茨海默氏症”关键字的用户。

测量

我们量化了每个平台上与痴呆症相关的帖子的平均每日数量和每个帖子的字数。根据代码本,我们对从痴呆症讨论点收集的 15513 篇帖子中的 5%和 Twitter 上的 10%(包含“痴呆症”,“阿尔茨海默氏症”或“阿尔茨海默氏症”)的 25948 篇可理解的帖子进行了主题内容分析。我们还总结了平台和帖子固有的与研究相关的特征。

结果

平均而言,痴呆症讨论点每天提供的新的与痴呆症相关的帖子不到两条,每条帖子的字数为 213.5 到 241.5 个,而 Twitter 上每天则有 7883 条新帖子,每条帖子有 14.5 个单词。痴呆症患者(PWD)通常会分享与痴呆症相关的关注点(75.7%),经历(68.6%)以及对信息和支持的请求(44.3%和 38.6%)。照顾者通常会分享照顾经验(67.0%)和信息请求(52.5%)。Twitter 上最常见的与痴呆症相关的帖子是对痴呆症一词的贬损性使用(14.5%),倡导,筹款和意识(11.6%)以及研究传播(8.0%)。概述了有关这些平台独特的技术和道德考虑因素的建议。

结论

了解 PWD 和他们的照顾者的重点仍然很重要,这有助于了解临床医生如何最好地为他们提供支持。本研究将帮助临床医生和研究人员更好地利用在线健康论坛和 Twitter 来获取此类与痴呆症相关的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验