Section of Geriatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):561-568. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18108. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
Approximately 20% of older persons with dementia have atrial fibrillation (AF). Nearly all have stroke risks that exceed the guideline-recommended threshold for anticoagulation. Although individuals with dementia develop profound impairments and die from the disease, little evidence exists to guide anticoagulant discontinuation, and almost one-third of nursing home residents with advanced dementia and AF remain anticoagulated in the last 6 months of life. We aimed to quantify the benefits and harms of anticoagulation in this population.
Using Minimum Data Set and Medicare claims, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with 14,877 long-stay nursing home residents aged ≥66 between 2013 and 2018 who had advanced dementia and AF. We excluded individuals with venous thromboembolism and valvular heart disease. We measured anticoagulant exposure quarterly, using Medicare Part D claims. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke and serious bleeding. We performed survival analyses with multivariable adjustment and inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighting.
In the study sample, 72.0% were female, 82.7% were aged ≥80 years, and 13.5% were nonwhite. Mean CHA DS VASC score was 6.19 ± 1.58. In multivariable survival analysis, anticoagulation was associated with decreased risk of death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.75) and increased bleeding risk (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29); the association with stroke risk was not significant (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.46). Results were similar in models with IPT weighting. While >50% of patients in both groups died within a year, median weighted survival was 76 days longer for anticoagulated individuals.
Persons with advanced dementia and AF derive clinically modest life prolongation from anticoagulation, at the cost of elevated risk of bleeding. The relevance of this benefit is unclear in a group with high dementia-related mortality and for whom the primary goal is often comfort.
约 20%的老年痴呆症患者患有房颤 (AF)。几乎所有患者的中风风险都超过了指南推荐的抗凝阈值。尽管痴呆症患者会出现严重的障碍并死于该疾病,但几乎没有证据可以指导抗凝剂的停药,而且近三分之一患有晚期痴呆症和 AF 的疗养院居民在生命的最后 6 个月仍在接受抗凝治疗。我们旨在量化该人群抗凝治疗的益处和危害。
使用最低数据集和医疗保险索赔,我们对 2013 年至 2018 年间年龄在 66 岁及以上、患有晚期痴呆症和 AF 的 14877 名长期疗养院居民进行了回顾性队列研究。我们排除了患有静脉血栓栓塞和心脏瓣膜病的患者。我们使用医疗保险部分 D 索赔每季度测量抗凝剂暴露情况。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是缺血性中风和严重出血。我们使用多变量调整和逆概率治疗 (IPT) 加权进行生存分析。
在研究样本中,72.0%为女性,82.7%年龄≥80 岁,13.5%为非白人。平均 CHA DS VASC 评分为 6.19±1.58。在多变量生存分析中,抗凝治疗与降低死亡风险相关(HR 0.71,95%CI 0.67-0.75)和增加出血风险(HR 1.15,95%CI 1.02-1.29);与中风风险的关联不显著(HR 1.08,95%CI 0.80-1.46)。IPT 加权模型的结果相似。虽然两组中超过 50%的患者在一年内死亡,但接受抗凝治疗的患者中位加权生存时间延长了 76 天。
患有晚期痴呆症和 AF 的患者从抗凝治疗中获得了适度的临床延长寿命,但其出血风险增加。对于死亡率高且主要目标通常是舒适的群体来说,这种益处的相关性尚不清楚。