• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Risk Prediction Tools for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective, Observational Study.中国武汉 2019 年冠状病毒病患者风险预测工具的评估:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1004-e1011. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004549.
2
Comparing Rapid Scoring Systems in Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease.比较新型冠状病毒疾病危重症患者死亡率预测的快速评分系统。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;27(6):461-468. doi: 10.1111/acem.13992. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score as a Predictor of Hospital Mortality in Patients of Coronavirus Disease 2019.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估系统 II 评分对新型冠状病毒肺炎患者住院病死率的预测价值。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):e657-e665. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004411.
4
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
ANDC: an early warning score to predict mortality risk for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019.ANDC:一种预测2019冠状病毒病患者死亡风险的早期预警评分
J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 31;18(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02505-7.
6
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 - a prospective cohort study.入院时的国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)可预测新冠病毒疾病的严重程度和住院死亡率-一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 13;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of the SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS for Early Detection of Clinical Deterioration in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients.SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 对 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者早期临床恶化的预测准确性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 29;35(25):e234. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e234.
8
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.利用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行风险分层:4C 死亡率评分的制定和验证。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339.
9
Performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in critically ill patients for the prediction of maternal death.产科早期预警评分在危重症患者中预测孕产妇死亡的效能
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):58.e1-58.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
Timing of invasive mechanic ventilation in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019.COVID-19 危重症患者有创机械通气时机。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1092-1098. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002939.

引用本文的文献

1
NEWS-2 Accuracy in Predicting Mortality and Severe Morbidity Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.新闻2:预测住院COVID-19患者死亡率和严重发病率的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216558.
2
Prehospital Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage score can effectively predict the 30-day mortality of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.院前大流行呼吸道感染急症系统分诊评分可有效预测新冠肺炎合并肺炎患者的 30 天死亡率。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2407954. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2407954. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
A novel deterioration prediction system for mild COVID-19 patients in Korea: a retrospective study.韩国一种新型的轻症 COVID-19 患者恶化预测系统:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71033-x.
4
iCovidCare: Intelligent health monitoring framework for COVID-19 using ensemble random forest in edge networks.iCovidCare:基于边缘网络中的集成随机森林的新冠肺炎智能健康监测框架。
Internet Things (Amst). 2021 Jun;14:100385. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2021.100385. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Prehospital physiological parameters related illness severity scores can accurately discriminate the severe/critical state in adult patients with COVID-19.院前生理参数相关疾病严重程度评分可准确区分 COVID-19 成年患者的严重/危急状态。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2239829. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2239829.
6
Implementation of a digital early warning score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist and general hospital settings in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在心脏专科和综合医院环境中实施数字早期预警评分(NEWS2):一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Mar;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001986.
7
The PaCO2/FiO2 ratio as outcome predictor in SARS-COV-2 related pneumonia: a retrospective study.PaCO2/FiO2 比值作为 SARS-CoV-2 相关肺炎的预后预测指标:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022256. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i5.13229.
8
Brixia and qSOFA Scores, Coagulation Factors and Blood Values in Spring versus Autumn 2021 Infection in Pregnant Critical COVID-19 Patients: A Preliminary Study.2021年春季与秋季妊娠重症COVID-19患者感染中的Brixia和qSOFA评分、凝血因子及血液值:一项初步研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;10(8):1423. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081423.
9
CURB-65, qSOFA, and SIRS Criteria in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients; a Prognostic Accuracy Study.CURB-65、qSOFA和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准预测危重症COVID-19患者院内死亡率的预后准确性研究
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May 10;10(1):e36. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1565. eCollection 2022.
10
Cardiovascular signatures of COVID-19 predict mortality and identify barrier stabilizing therapies.新冠病毒病的心血管特征可预测死亡率并确定稳定屏障的治疗方法。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Apr;78:103982. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103982. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.中国武汉严重 COVID-19 患者的临床病程和结局:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.中国2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的特征及重要经验教训:来自中国疾病预防控制中心72314例病例报告的总结
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648.
3
Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series.一组在中国武汉以外地区感染 2019 年新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的患者的临床特征:回顾性病例系列。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 19;368:m606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m606.
4
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.《武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎 138 例住院患者临床特征分析》
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
5
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.中国武汉 99 例 2019 年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的流行病学和临床特征:描述性研究。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.2019 年中国肺炎患者中的一种新型冠状病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Clinical Features Predicting Mortality Risk in Patients With Viral Pneumonia: The MuLBSTA Score.预测病毒性肺炎患者死亡风险的临床特征:MuLBSTA评分
Front Microbiol. 2019 Dec 3;10:2752. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02752. eCollection 2019.
8
A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分与国家早期预警评分在非 ICU 感染/非感染患者中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1923-1933. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003359.
9
A Comparison of the Ability of the Physiologic Components of Medical Emergency Team Criteria and the U.K. National Early Warning Score to Discriminate Patients at Risk of a Range of Adverse Clinical Outcomes.生理因素在医疗急救团队标准与英国国家早期预警评分鉴别不同不良临床结局风险患者能力的比较
Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):2171-2181. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002000.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

中国武汉 2019 年冠状病毒病患者风险预测工具的评估:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。

Evaluation of the Risk Prediction Tools for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective, Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1004-e1011. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004549.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004549
PMID:32897668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7448719/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age 65 score, and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment on predicting in-hospital death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single center, West Campus of Wuhan Union hospital-a temporary center to manage critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

PATIENTS

A total of 673 consecutive adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 between January 30, 2020, and March 14, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data on demography, comorbidities, vital signs, mental status, oxygen saturation, and use of supplemental oxygen at admission to the ward were collected from medical records and used to score National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age 65 score, and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment. Total number of patients was 673 (51% male) and median (interquartile range) age was 61 years (50-69 yr). One-hundred twenty-one patients died (18%). For predicting in-hospital death, the area under the receiver operating characteristics (95% CI) for National Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age 65 score, and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment were 0.882 (0.847-0.916), 0.880 (0.845-0.914), 0.839 (0.800-0.879), 0.766 (0.718-0.814), and 0.694 (0.641-0.746), respectively. Among the parameters of National Early Warning Score, the oxygen saturation score was found to be the most significant predictor of in-hospital death. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (95% CI) for oxygen saturation score was 0.875 (0.834-0.916).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study, the discrimination of National Early Warning Score/National Early Warning Score 2 for predicting mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the ward was found to be superior to Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age 65 score, and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment. Peripheral oxygen saturation could independently predict in-hospital death in these patients. Further validation of our finding in multiple settings is needed to determine its applicability for coronavirus disease 2019.

摘要

目的

评估和比较国家早期预警评分、国家早期预警评分 2、快速急诊医学评分、意识模糊、呼吸频率、血压、年龄 65 分和快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估在预测 2019 年冠状病毒病患者院内死亡中的疗效。

设计

回顾性、观察性研究。

地点

单中心,武汉协和医院西院区-一个管理 2019 年冠状病毒病重症患者的临时中心。

患者

2020 年 1 月 30 日至 3 月 14 日期间,共 673 例连续成年 2019 年冠状病毒病患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

从病历中收集人口统计学、合并症、生命体征、精神状态、血氧饱和度和入院时使用补充氧气的数据,并用于评分国家早期预警评分、国家早期预警评分 2、快速急诊医学评分、意识模糊、呼吸频率、血压、年龄 65 分和快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估。总共有 673 名患者(51%为男性),中位(四分位间距)年龄为 61 岁(50-69 岁)。121 名患者死亡(18%)。对于预测院内死亡,国家早期预警评分、国家早期预警评分 2、快速急诊医学评分、意识模糊、呼吸频率、血压、年龄 65 分和快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(95%CI)分别为 0.882(0.847-0.916)、0.880(0.845-0.914)、0.839(0.800-0.879)、0.766(0.718-0.814)和 0.694(0.641-0.746)。在国家早期预警评分的参数中,发现血氧饱和度评分是院内死亡的最显著预测因素。血氧饱和度评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(95%CI)为 0.875(0.834-0.916)。

结论

在这项单中心研究中,发现国家早期预警评分/国家早期预警评分 2 对预测 2019 年冠状病毒病住院患者死亡率的区分度优于快速急诊医学评分、意识模糊、呼吸频率、血压、年龄 65 分和快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估。外周血氧饱和度可独立预测这些患者的院内死亡。需要在多个环境中进一步验证我们的发现,以确定其对 2019 年冠状病毒病的适用性。