Dipartimento di Medicina Cardiovascolare, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 15;203(4):447-457. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2454OC.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the cornerstone of cardiac arrest (CA) treatment. However, lung injuries associated with it have been reported. To assess ) the presence and characteristics of lung abnormalities induced by cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ) the role of mechanical and manual chest compression (CC) in its development. This translational study included ) a porcine model of CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( = 12) and ) a multicenter cohort of patients with out-of-hospital CA undergoing mechanical or manual CC ( = 52). Lung computed tomography performed after resuscitation was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively along with respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges. The lung weight in the mechanical CC group was higher compared with the manual CC group in the experimental (431 ± 127 vs. 273 ± 66, = 0.022) and clinical study (1,208 ± 630 vs. 837 ± 306, = 0.006). The mechanical CC group showed significantly lower oxygenation ( = 0.043) and respiratory system compliance ( < 0.001) compared with the manual CC group in the experimental study. The variation of right atrial pressure was significantly higher in the mechanical compared with the manual CC group (54 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 6 mm Hg, = 0.001) and significantly correlated with lung weight ( = 0.686, = 0.026) and respiratory system compliance ( = -0.634, = 0.027). Incidence of abnormal lung density was higher in patients treated with mechanical compared with manual CC (37% vs. 8%, = 0.018). This study demonstrated the presence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation-associated lung edema in animals and in patients with out-of-hospital CA, which is more pronounced after mechanical as opposed to manual CC and correlates with higher swings of right atrial pressure during CC.
心肺复苏术是心脏骤停 (CA) 治疗的基石。然而,与之相关的肺部损伤已被报道。本研究旨在评估心肺复苏术引起的肺部异常的存在和特征,以及机械和手动胸外按压 (CC) 在其发展中的作用。本研究包括一项 CA 和心肺复苏术的猪模型研究(n=12)和一项接受机械或手动 CC 的院外 CA 患者多中心队列研究(n=52)。复苏后进行肺部计算机断层扫描,从定性和定量两个方面评估呼吸力学和气体交换。与手动 CC 组相比,机械 CC 组的肺重量在实验(431±127 对 273±66,=0.022)和临床研究(1208±630 对 837±306,=0.006)中均较高。与手动 CC 组相比,机械 CC 组在实验研究中显示出明显较低的氧合作用(=0.043)和呼吸系统顺应性(<0.001)。与手动 CC 组相比,机械 CC 组右心房压力的变化明显更高(54±11 对 31±6 毫米汞柱,=0.001),且与肺重量(=0.686,=0.026)和呼吸系统顺应性(= -0.634,=0.027)显著相关。与手动 CC 相比,机械 CC 治疗的患者异常肺密度的发生率更高(37%对 8%,=0.018)。本研究表明,动物和院外 CA 患者存在心肺复苏相关的肺水肿,机械 CC 比手动 CC 更明显,与 CC 期间右心房压力的波动更大相关。