• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无意愿指定代理人的老年人:全国代表性样本研究

Older Adults without Desired Surrogates in a Nationally Representative Sample.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

VA Connecticut Health System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):114-121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16813. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.16813
PMID:32898285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Little is known about older adults who have intact capacity but do not have a desired surrogate to make decisions if their capacity becomes impaired.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample.

SETTING

National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), 2005-2006.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older adults without known cognitive impairment, aged 57 to 85, interviewed as part of NSHAP (n = 2,767).

MEASUREMENTS

We examined demographic, medical, and social connectedness characteristics associated with answering "no" to this question: "Do you have someone who you would like to make medical decisions for you if you were unable, as for example if you were seriously injured or very sick?" Because many states permit nuclear family to make decisions for persons with no legally appointed health care agent, we used logistic regression to identify factors associated with individuals who were ill suited to this paradigm in the sense that they had nuclear family but did not have a desired surrogate.

RESULTS

Among NSHAP respondents, 7.5% (95% confidence interval = 6.4-8.7) did not have a desired surrogate. Nearly 90% of respondents without desired surrogates had nuclear family. Compared with respondents with desired surrogates, those without desired surrogates had lower indicators of social connectedness. On average, however, they had four confidants, approximately 70% socialized at least monthly, and more than 90% could discuss their health with a confidant. Among respondents who had nuclear family, few characteristics distinguished those with and without desired surrogates.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 8% of older adults did not have a desired surrogate. Most had nuclear family and were not socially disconnected. Older adults should be asked explicitly about a desired surrogate, and strategies are needed to identify surrogates for those who do not have family or would not choose family to make decisions for them.

摘要

背景/目的:对于那些能力完好但如果能力受损,没有想要的代理人来做出决策的老年人,我们知之甚少。

设计

对具有全国代表性的样本进行的横断面研究。

地点

国家社会生活、健康和老龄化项目(NSHAP),2005-2006 年。

参与者

没有认知障碍的、年龄在 57 至 85 岁之间的、作为 NSHAP 的一部分接受采访的社区居住的老年人(n=2767)。

测量

我们检查了与回答这个问题“如果您无法做出医疗决策,例如如果您受到重伤或非常生病,您是否有您希望为您做出决策的人?”相关的人口统计学、医学和社会联系特征。因为许多州允许核心家庭为没有合法指定的医疗保健代理人的人做出决策,所以我们使用逻辑回归来确定与个人不适合这种模式的因素,因为他们有核心家庭但没有想要的代理人。

结果

在 NSHAP 受访者中,有 7.5%(95%置信区间=6.4-8.7)没有想要的代理人。几乎 90%没有想要的代理人的受访者都有核心家庭。与有想要的代理人的受访者相比,没有想要的代理人的受访者的社会联系指标较低。然而,平均而言,他们有四个知己,大约 70%的人每月至少社交一次,超过 90%的人可以与知己讨论他们的健康问题。在有核心家庭的受访者中,很少有特征可以区分有和没有想要的代理人的受访者。

结论

近 8%的老年人没有想要的代理人。大多数人都有核心家庭,并且没有与社会脱节。应该明确询问老年人关于他们想要的代理人的问题,并且需要制定策略来为那些没有家庭或不愿意选择家庭来为他们做出决策的人确定代理人。

相似文献

1
Older Adults without Desired Surrogates in a Nationally Representative Sample.无意愿指定代理人的老年人:全国代表性样本研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):114-121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16813. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults.住院老年患者中代理决策的范围和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):370-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315.
3
Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision-making.为他人做决定:关于替代决策程序偏好的人群调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 25;8(7):e022289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022289.
4
Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others.幸存的替代决策:哪些因素有助于或阻碍为他人做出医疗决策的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y. Epub 2007 Jul 7.
5
How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.代理人如何决策:对住院老年患者代理人所使用决策原则的二次数据分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1285-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4158-z. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Impact of Patients' Expressed Wishes on Their Surrogate Decision Makers' Preferred Decision-Making Roles in Japan.患者表达的意愿对其在日本的代理人决策制定者偏好的决策角色的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(3):354-360. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0226. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
7
Older Adult and Surrogate Perspectives on Serious, Difficult, and Important Medical Decisions.老年患者及其代理人对严重、困难和重要医疗决策的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1515-1523. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15426. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
Identifying family members who may struggle in the role of surrogate decision maker.识别可能在代理决策角色中挣扎的家庭成员。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2281-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182533317.
9
Spiritual and Religious Coping of Medical Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adult Patients.住院老年患者的医疗决策者的精神和宗教应对方式。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;22(4):385-392. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0406. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Honoring patient care preferences: surrogates speak.尊重患者的护理偏好:代理人发言。
Omega (Westport). 2012;65(4):257-80. doi: 10.2190/OM.65.4.b.

引用本文的文献

1
American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults.美国老年医学会立场声明:为无代理人的老年人做出医疗决策
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1353-1364. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19288. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
Advance personal planning knowledge, attitudes, and participation amongst community-dwelling older people living in regional New South Wales, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的地区居住的社区老年人中提高个人预先规划知识、态度和参与度:一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0309152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309152. eCollection 2024.
3
Current situation of the hospitalization of persons without family in Japan and related medical challenges.日本无家属住院者的现状及相关医疗挑战。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0276090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276090. eCollection 2023.
4
"I worry about this patient EVERY day": Geriatrics Clinicians' Challenges in Caring for Unrepresented Older Adults.“我每天都为这位患者担心”:老年病临床医生在照顾无代表的老年患者时面临的挑战。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Apr;41(4):1167-1174. doi: 10.1177/07334648211041261. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
5
Characteristics of Older Adults Who Cannot Identify a Healthcare Agent.无法确定医疗代理人的老年人的特征。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1313-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06798-2. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unrepresented Patients in the ICU. An Official American Thoracic Society/American Geriatrics Society Policy Statement.为 ICU 中未被代表的患者做出医疗决策。美国胸科学会/美国老年医学学会官方政策声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1182-1192. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0512ST.
2
Comment on: End-of-Life Decision Making and Treatment for Patients With Professional Guardians.关于《专业监护人对患者的临终决策与治疗》的评论
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):896. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16385. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
3
Advance Care Planning: Social Isolation Matters.预先医疗照护计划:社会孤立不容忽视。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):841-846. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16287. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Characteristics of Patients With Professional Guardians in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System.美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中由专业监护人监护的患者特征。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):107-108. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4849.
5
Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults.独自面对:对无人陪伴老年人的范围综述
Can J Aging. 2018 Mar;37(1):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0714980817000563. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
6
Advance Directives for Dementia: Meeting a Unique Challenge.痴呆症的预先指示:应对独特挑战
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2175-2176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16473.
7
Why Social Relationships Are Important for Physical Health: A Systems Approach to Understanding and Modifying Risk and Protection.为什么社会关系对身体健康很重要:理解和改变风险与保护的系统方法。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:437-458. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
9
Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers.谁来决定患者何时无法做出决定?关于替代决策者的法规。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1478-1482. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1611497.
10
AGS Position Statement: Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unbefriended Older Adults.美国老年医学会立场声明:为无亲人陪伴的老年人做出医疗决策
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jan;65(1):14-15. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14586. Epub 2016 Nov 22.