• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers.

作者信息

DeMartino Erin S, Dudzinski David M, Doyle Cavan K, Sperry Beau P, Gregory Sarah E, Siegler Mark, Sulmasy Daniel P, Mueller Paul S, Kramer Daniel B

机构信息

From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (E.S.D.), the Biomedical Ethics Research Program (E.S.D., B.P.S., P.S.M.), and the Division of General Internal Medicine (P.S.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago (E.S.D., C.K.D., M.S.), the Beazley Institute for Health Law and Policy, Loyola University Chicago School of Law (S.E.G.), and the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center (M.S.) - all in Chicago; the Departments of Medicine and Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (D.P.S.); and the Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (D.M.D.), Harvard Medical School (D.M.D., D.B.K.), and the Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.B.K.) - all in Boston.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1478-1482. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1611497.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMms1611497
PMID:28402767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527273/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/5527273/4739c39071e8/nihms876846f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/5527273/4739c39071e8/nihms876846f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/5527273/4739c39071e8/nihms876846f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers.谁来决定患者何时无法做出决定？关于替代决策者的法规。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1478-1482. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1611497.
2
Surrogate decision makers: what if a surrogate cannot decide?
JAAPA. 2012 Feb;25(2):61-2. doi: 10.1097/01720610-201202000-00014.
3
Ethical waves of the silver tsunami: consent, capacity, and surrogate decision-making.银色海啸的伦理浪潮：同意、行为能力与替代决策
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;21(4):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.023. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
4
Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.南希·克鲁赞与最佳利益标准。
Midwest Med Ethics. 1990 Fall;6(4):17-9.
5
US State Regulation of Decisions for Pregnant Women Without Decisional Capacity.美国对孕妇无决策能力情况下决策的州级监管。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1629-1631. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2587.
6
Preserving patient dignity when surrogates step in.当代理人介入时维护患者尊严。
Provider. 2004 Jul;30(7):28-9, 31-2, 35-7 passim.
7
Considering the boundaries of decision-making authority: An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46.考虑决策权力的界限：国民保健服务信托基金诉Y案[2018]英国最高法院案例汇编第46号
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Jun;16(2):153-157. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09914-4. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
The bane of surrogate decision-making: defining the best interests of never-competent persons.替代决策的难题：界定无行为能力者的最佳利益
J Leg Med. 2005 Jun;26(2):155-205. doi: 10.1080/01947640590949922.
9
Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.医疗保健代理人法规：伦理陷阱威胁无行为能力患者的利益。
West VA Law Rev. 1998 Fall;101(1):99-128.
10
Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions.无行为能力时对临床决策的同意。第1部分：做出决策。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2004 Mar;10(10):18-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstruction of patients' treatment preferences in disorders of consciousness: a systematic review.意识障碍患者治疗偏好的重建：一项系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01241-1.
2
Determining Mental Capacity and Identifying Surrogates: The Need for Clearer Guidance on Medical Decision-Making in Malaysia.确定心理能力和识别替代决策者：马来西亚在医疗决策方面需要更明确的指导。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Sep 23;17(1):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00313-5. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance directive completion by elderly Americans: a decade of change.美国老年人预先指示的完成情况：十年的变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Apr;62(4):706-10. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12736. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
2
Completion of advance directives among U.S. consumers.美国消费者完成预立医疗指示的情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.008.
3
The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy.医疗保健预先计划法律和政策的演变。
SAFE - GOALS：重症监护病房护理目标讨论方案
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 11;10(1):e001663. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001663. eCollection 2025.
4
American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults.美国老年医学会立场声明：为无代理人的老年人做出医疗决策
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1353-1364. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19288. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
5
When a Patient Is at Foreseeable Risk of Losing Decisional and Functional Capacity.当患者面临可预见的丧失决策能力和功能能力的风险时。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Dec 12;52(4):414-424. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240070-24.
6
Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: a qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience.从西班牙语患者、护理人员和社区领导的视角看住院体验：一项关于住院经历的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02246-9.
7
"How do You Take that Much Time for One Person's Life?" Experiences of Dementia Caregivers Who are Not Immediate Family.“你怎么能为一个人的生命花费那么多时间？”非直系亲属痴呆症照料者的经历
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):166-175. doi: 10.1177/07334648241265197. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
8
Home Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients at Risk for Becoming Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates.居家护理临床医生对有潜在失能风险且无明显预先指示或代理人的患者进行预先护理计划的看法。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Apr 1;26(2):74-81. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000998. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
9
Staff and Proxy Views of Multiple Family Member Involvement in Decision Making for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia.员工和代理人对养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民的决策中多家庭成员参与的看法。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 Oct 1;25(5):263-270. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000957. Epub 2023 May 26.
10
Gender differences in the intention to withhold life-sustaining treatments involving severe dementia for self and on behalf of parent or spouse.涉及严重痴呆症时，自己和代表父母或配偶拒绝维持生命的治疗的意愿中的性别差异。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 6;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01062-8.
Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):211-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00596.x.
4
HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy.关于临终或要求停止治疗的患者心血管植入式电子设备（CIEDs）管理的HRS专家共识声明。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jul;7(7):1008-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 May 14.
5
Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.生前预嘱与代理人决策的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901.
6
Decision-making capacity in elderly, terminally ill patients with cancer.老年晚期癌症患者的决策能力
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(3):393-404. doi: 10.1002/bsl.764.
7
Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.欧洲重症监护病房中临终决策的沟通。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Sep;31(9):1215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2742-x. Epub 2005 Jul 22.
8
Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study.住院患者精神能力障碍的患病率及相关危险因素：横断面研究
Lancet. 2004;364(9443):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17224-3.
9
The limits of advance directives: a history and assessment of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
Wake Forest Law Rev. 1997 Summer;32(2):249-93.
10
Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).危重症患者谵妄的评估：重症监护病房意识模糊评估法（CAM-ICU）的验证
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.