Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Division of Biostatistics, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1561-1565. doi: 10.1002/lary.29019. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Outcomes in laryngology focus primarily on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The increasing number of questionnaires may lead to survey fatigue. We sought to determine the relationship between the newest questionnaire, Laryngopharyngeal Universal Measure of Perceived Sensation (LUMP), and other laryngology PROMs.
Cross-sectional study.
Patients undergoing laryngology multidisciplinary evaluation prospectively completed laryngology questionnaires. Average summed scores between standard laryngology PROMs (ie, VHI-10, RSI, DI, CSI, EAT-10) and LUMP were compared. Expert consensus panel identified the most clinically relevant statements which were then compared to LUMP summed scores, in increasingly additive fashion.
Four hundred eighty patients (259 female) were assessed. Average age was 57.1 ± 17.7 years. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each PROM in comparison to LUMP ranged from moderate to poor correlation: 0.64 (RSI), 0.55 (EAT-10), 0.50 (DI), 0.48 (CSI), and 0.34 (VHI-10). ICC for combinations of the five most clinically relevant individual items ranged from 0.29-0.53.
Patients with self-reported globus had statistically significantly higher scores across all PROMs. RSI had moderate correlation with LUMP, and the five selected expert consensus items demonstrated weaker correlation. While RSI may serve as a moderately selective clinical proxy for the LUMP questionnaire, LUMP remains a validated tool with increased specificity for quantification of globus which may be especially important in the research setting. There is continued question about the need for multiple laryngologic PROMs to evaluate patient complaints, and survey reduction remains an area of interest to decrease respondent fatigue, optimize patient care, and quantify interventional success.
4 Laryngoscope, 131:1561-1565, 2021.
喉科学的研究结果主要集中在患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)上。越来越多的问卷可能会导致调查疲劳。我们旨在确定最新问卷——喉咽普遍感知感觉量表(LUMP)与其他喉科学 PROMs 之间的关系。
横断面研究。
前瞻性地对接受喉科学多学科评估的患者进行喉科学问卷评估。将标准喉科学 PROM(即 VHI-10、RSI、DI、CSI、EAT-10)和 LUMP 的平均总和评分进行比较。专家共识小组确定了最具临床相关性的陈述,然后以递增的方式将这些陈述与 LUMP 总和评分进行比较。
共评估了 480 名患者(259 名女性)。平均年龄为 57.1±17.7 岁。与 LUMP 相比,每种 PROM 的组内相关系数(ICC)范围从中度到较差相关性:0.64(RSI)、0.55(EAT-10)、0.50(DI)、0.48(CSI)和 0.34(VHI-10)。五个最具临床相关性的个体项目组合的 ICC 范围为 0.29-0.53。
自我报告有球感的患者在所有 PROM 中均有统计学上显著更高的评分。RSI 与 LUMP 呈中度相关,而五个选定的专家共识项目相关性较弱。虽然 RSI 可能作为 LUMP 问卷的中度选择性临床替代指标,但 LUMP 仍然是一种经过验证的工具,其对球感的量化具有更高的特异性,这在研究环境中可能尤为重要。对于评估患者的投诉是否需要多种喉科学 PROM 仍存在疑问,减少调查仍然是减少受访者疲劳、优化患者护理和量化干预成功的一个关注领域。
4 Laryngoscope,131:1561-1565,2021。