Simons Jeffrey P, Rosen Clark A, Casselbrant Margaretha L, Chi David H, Schaitkin Barry M, Rubinstein Elaine N, Mandell David L
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3705 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;134(8):837-41. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.8.837.
To examine correlations between the Pediatric Voice Outcome Survey (PVOS) score, the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) score, the Reflux Finding Score (RFS), and esophageal biopsy findings in children undergoing upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy.
Retrospective review of pediatric voice quality-of-life and laryngopharyngeal reflux surveys. Blinded assessment of endoscopic laryngeal images.
Tertiary care children's hospital.
The study included 36 children with the primary problem of dysphonia (n = 28) or cough (n = 8) who underwent endoscopy.
The PVOS and the RSI were administered to the patient's parents before surgery. The patients underwent laryngotracheobronchoscopy and esophageal biopsy. Four raters independently assigned an RFS to the laryngeal photographs.
The assessment included (1) PVOS scores, RSI scores, and RFSs; (2) internal consistency of PVOS and RSI scores; (3) RFS intrarater and interrater reliability; and (4) correlations between PVOS score, RSI score, RFS, and esophageal biopsy findings.
The mean (SD) age of the patients was 7.5 (2.6) years; the mean (SD) PVOS score, 71.9 (21.4); and the mean (SD) RSI score, 16.2 (9.1). The PVOS and the RSI scores demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.79 and 0.78, respectively). The RFS exhibited good intrarater reliability (r = 0.66-0.98) and moderate interrater reliability (r = 0.32-0.70). The PVOS and RSI instruments displayed significant correlation (r = -0.30; P = .04). There were no other significant correlations between RFSs, esophageal biopsy results, PVOS scores, or RSI scores (P > .05).
The RSI may be a useful parent-proxy instrument in addition to the PVOS for pediatric voice patients. The RFS is reliable in children, but its validity could not be demonstrated in this patient population.
探讨小儿嗓音结果调查(PVOS)评分、反流症状指数(RSI)评分、反流发现评分(RFS)与接受上呼吸道消化道内镜检查儿童的食管活检结果之间的相关性。
对小儿嗓音生活质量和喉咽反流调查进行回顾性研究。对内窥镜下喉部图像进行盲法评估。
三级护理儿童医院。
该研究纳入了36名主要问题为发声困难(n = 28)或咳嗽(n = 8)且接受了内镜检查的儿童。
在手术前向患者父母发放PVOS和RSI问卷。患者接受了喉气管支气管镜检查和食管活检。四名评估者独立对喉部照片进行RFS评分。
评估内容包括:(1)PVOS评分、RSI评分和RFS评分;(2)PVOS和RSI评分的内部一致性;(3)RFS评分者内和评分者间的可靠性;(4)PVOS评分、RSI评分、RFS与食管活检结果之间的相关性。
患者的平均(标准差)年龄为7.5(2.6)岁;平均(标准差)PVOS评分为71.9(21.4);平均(标准差)RSI评分为16.2(9.1)。PVOS和RSI评分显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach α分别为0.79和0.78)。RFS显示出良好的评分者内可靠性(r = 0.66 - 0.98)和中等的评分者间可靠性(r = 0.32 - 0.70)。PVOS和RSI工具显示出显著相关性(r = -0.30;P = .04)。RFS、食管活检结果、PVOS评分或RSI评分之间无其他显著相关性(P > .05)。
除PVOS外,RSI可能是用于小儿嗓音患者的一种有用的家长代理工具。RFS在儿童中具有可靠性,但在该患者群体中未证实其有效性。