Suppr超能文献

预存房室传导障碍患者晕厥的病因。

Etiology of syncope in patients with preexisting atrioventricular conduction disorders.

机构信息

Cardiology Clinic, Safarik University, VUSCH, Košice, Slovakia.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1268-1272. doi: 10.1111/pace.14064. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The discussion about the feasibility of empiric pacemaker implantation in patients with preexisting atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders continues. The aim of the study was to determine the etiology of syncope and the need for pacemaker insertion in patients with AV conduction impairment using implantable loop recorder (ILR).

METHODS

ILR was implanted after negative diagnostic workup in 37 patients with syncope (24 men, 13 women, age 72 ± 10 years) and preexisting impairment of AV conduction. First-degree AV block (AVB I) was present in 26 patients, and bundle branch block (BBB) in 17 patients.

RESULTS

ILR-based diagnosis was made in 28 patients (75%)-sinus arrest in 13 patients, complete AVB in 10 patients, and vasodepressor syncope in five patients. In patients with preexisting BBB, sinus arrest occurred during ILR monitoring significantly more frequently than in patients without BBB (53% vs 20%, P = .03). Complete AVB was significantly less common in patients with preexisting BBB than in patients without BBB (12% vs 40%, P = .04). On multivariate regression analysis, the only independent predictor of AVB occurrence during ILR monitoring was preexisting AVB I (P = .03). The only independent predictor of sinus arrest during ILR monitoring was preexisting BBB (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with preexisting AV conduction disorders, prevailing syncopal mechanism during ILR monitoring was asystole. However, sinus arrest occurred more often than complete AVB and was predicted by preexisting BBB. Preexisting AVB was a predictor of complete AVB during ILR monitoring.

摘要

背景

关于在存在预先存在的房室(AV)传导障碍的患者中进行经验性起搏器植入的可行性的讨论仍在继续。本研究的目的是使用植入式环路记录器(ILR)确定伴有 AV 传导障碍的晕厥患者的病因和起搏器植入的需求。

方法

在经过阴性诊断性检查后,在 37 例晕厥(24 名男性,13 名女性,年龄 72±10 岁)和预先存在的 AV 传导障碍的患者中植入 ILR。26 例患者存在一度房室阻滞(AVB I),17 例患者存在束支阻滞(BBB)。

结果

28 例(75%)患者根据 ILR 诊断-13 例窦性停搏,10 例完全性 AVB,5 例血管迷走性晕厥。在预先存在 BBB 的患者中,ILR 监测期间窦性停搏的发生率明显高于无 BBB 的患者(53%比 20%,P=0.03)。预先存在 BBB 的患者中完全性 AVB 的发生率明显低于无 BBB 的患者(12%比 40%,P=0.04)。多变量回归分析显示,ILR 监测期间发生 AVB 的唯一独立预测因素是预先存在的 AVB I(P=0.03)。ILR 监测期间窦性停搏的唯一独立预测因素是预先存在的 BBB(P=0.03)。

结论

在预先存在 AV 传导障碍的患者中,ILR 监测期间占主导地位的晕厥机制是窦性停搏。然而,窦性停搏比完全性 AVB 更常见,并且可以通过预先存在的 BBB 来预测。预先存在的 AVB 是 ILR 监测期间完全性 AVB 的预测因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验