Allen Caitlin G, McBride Colleen M, Engdawork Kibur, Ayode Desta, Tadele Getnet
Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA,
Present Address: Boston University, 72 E. Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Crit Public Health. 2019;29(1):84-99. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2017.1409885. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
The rapid pace of genomic discovery has raised public expectation and concerns about the utility of new discoveries and their potential to exacerbate health disparities. Improving literacy concerning gene and environmental (GxE) contributors to disease is needed to avoid commonly observed deterministic misconceptions about genomics. Mental models approaches that incorporate community engagement processes could be used to inform GxE literacy-building interventions. We used a mental models approach to describe and systematically compare expert and lay understanding of GxE interactions, using the example of podoconiosis, a non-infectious lymphedema endemic in highland Ethiopia. Methods included: (1) specifying elicitation questions for a literature review, (2) eliciting an expert model, (3) eliciting a lay model, and (4) comparing the two models. We used a coding scheme to identify lay participants' knowledge gaps, misunderstandings and extra knowledge relative to the expert standard. Results indicated that lay participants' viewed poverty as an important susceptibility factor and considered heredity and contagion to have a joint causal influence. Experts did not endorse either of these viewpoints. Conventional expert-based interventions aimed to correct misconceptions about behaviors important for prevention may be stymied by lay views that social environmental factors have more important influences on health outcomes. GxE literacy interventions that consider multiple levels of influence including social determinants of health and personal resilience to augment health education strategies are needed in diverse settings. Novel communication approaches will be needed to help target audiences disentangle long-held conceptions of heredity and contagion.
基因组发现的快速发展引发了公众对新发现的实用性及其加剧健康差距可能性的期望和担忧。为避免常见的关于基因组学的决定论误解,需要提高对基因和环境(基因与环境相互作用,GxE)对疾病影响的认知水平。纳入社区参与过程的心智模型方法可用于指导GxE认知构建干预措施。我们以埃塞俄比亚高地特有的非传染性淋巴水肿——地方性象皮病为例,采用心智模型方法来描述并系统比较专家和外行对GxE相互作用的理解。方法包括:(1)为文献综述确定启发式问题;(2)引出专家模型;(3)引出外行模型;(4)比较这两种模型。我们使用一种编码方案来识别外行参与者相对于专家标准的知识差距、误解和额外知识。结果表明,外行参与者将贫困视为一个重要的易感性因素,并认为遗传和传染具有共同的因果影响。专家并不认同这两种观点。基于专家的传统干预措施旨在纠正对预防重要行为的误解,但可能会因外行认为社会环境因素对健康结果有更重要影响的观点而受阻。在不同环境中,需要考虑包括健康的社会决定因素和个人恢复力等多层次影响的GxE认知干预措施,以增强健康教育策略。需要新颖的沟通方式来帮助目标受众理清长期以来对遗传和传染的观念。