• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于确定拔管准备情况的疾病特异性阈值:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的最佳吸气负压。

Disease specific thresholds for determining extubation readiness: The optimal negative inspiratory force for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

作者信息

Vahedian-Azimi Amir, Bashar Farshid R, Boushra Marina N, Quinn Joseph W, Miller Andrew C

机构信息

Trauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):99-104. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_37_20. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

DOI:10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_37_20
PMID:32904565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7456290/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The negative inspiratory force (NIF) has been used to help clinicians predict a patient's likelihood of successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV). However, the utility of the traditional threshold of ≤-30 cmH O may not be appropriate for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aims to define the optimal predictive NIF threshold for COPD patients.

METHODS

A prospective-observational multi-center study was conducted in intensive care units of six academic medical centers. All patients had COPD and were intubated for hypercapnic respiratory failure. The process of weaning from MV was conducted according to the defined hospital protocol. NIF was measured after 120 min of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-) were calculated, and the diagnostic accuracy recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients with COPD (39 males and 51 females) were included. Of these, 43 patients (47.8%) were successfully extubated whereas 47 patients (52.2%) failed SBT or required re-intubation ( = 0.654). The threshold value of ≤-25 cmHO offered the optimal performance in COPD patients: area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves ROC curves 0.836, sensitivity 95.0%, specificity 86.0%, PPV 84.4%, and NPV 95.6%., LR+ 6.79, LR- 0.06, and the diagnostic accuracy 90.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

In mechanically ventilated COPD patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure, the NIF threshold of ≤-25 cmHO was a moderate-to-good predictor for successful ventilator liberation, and outperforms the traditional threshold of ≤-30 cmHO.

摘要

目的

负吸气力(NIF)已被用于帮助临床医生预测患者成功脱离机械通气(MV)的可能性。然而,传统的≤-30 cmH₂O阈值可能不适用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。本研究旨在确定COPD患者的最佳预测NIF阈值。

方法

在六个学术医疗中心的重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。所有患者均患有COPD,并因高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭而插管。根据既定的医院方案进行脱机过程。在自主呼吸试验(SBT)120分钟后测量NIF。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)、阳性和阴性似然比(LR+、LR-),并记录诊断准确性。

结果

共纳入90例COPD患者(男性39例,女性51例)。其中,43例患者(47.8%)成功拔管,而47例患者(52.2%)SBT失败或需要重新插管(P = 0.654)。≤-25 cmH₂O的阈值在COPD患者中表现最佳:受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.836,敏感性为95.0%,特异性为86.0%,PPV为84.4%,NPV为95.6%,LR+为6.79,LR-为0.0,6,诊断准确性为90.7%。

结论

在因高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭而接受机械通气的COPD患者中,≤-25 cmH₂O的NIF阈值是成功脱机的中到良好预测指标,优于传统的≤-30 cmH₂O阈值。

相似文献

1
Disease specific thresholds for determining extubation readiness: The optimal negative inspiratory force for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.用于确定拔管准备情况的疾病特异性阈值:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的最佳吸气负压。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):99-104. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_37_20. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
A rapid shallow breathing index threshold of 85 best predicts extubation success in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.对于患有高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,快速浅呼吸指数阈值为85最能预测拔管成功。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(4):1223-1232. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.103.
3
[Predictive value of lung ultrasound score on weaning outcome in patients with intro-abdominal infection undergoing mechanical ventilation].[肺部超声评分对机械通气的腹腔内感染患者撤机结局的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):94-98. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191127-00017.
4
Work of Breathing During Proportional Assist Ventilation as a Predictor of Extubation Failure.比例辅助通气时的呼吸功可预测拔管失败。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1049-1057. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10225. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Predictive value of the negative inspiratory force index as a predictor of weaning success: a crosssectional study.作为撤机成功预测指标的吸气负压指数的预测价值:一项横断面研究。
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Nov;35(4):279-285. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00598. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Improvement in the Prediction of Ventilator Weaning Outcomes by an Artificial Neural Network in a Medical ICU.医学重症监护病房中人工神经网络对机械通气撤机结果预测的改善
Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1560-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03648. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
A decision-tree model for predicting extubation outcome in elderly patients after a successful spontaneous breathing trial.用于预测成功自主呼吸试验后老年患者拔管结局的决策树模型。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1211-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4e82e. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
8
[A multicenter study of respiratory multiple index in predicting weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[一项关于呼吸多指标预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者机械通气撤机的多中心研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Jun;25(6):339-42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.06.006.
9
An evaluation of extubation failure predictors in mechanically ventilated infants and children.机械通气婴幼儿拔管失败预测因素的评估
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jun;28(6):752-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1306-6. Epub 2002 May 9.
10
Weaning and extubation in the intensive care unit. Clinical or index-driven approach?重症监护病房中的撤机和拔管。临床方法还是指标驱动方法?
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Aug;22(8):752-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01709517.

本文引用的文献

1
A rapid shallow breathing index threshold of 85 best predicts extubation success in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.对于患有高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,快速浅呼吸指数阈值为85最能预测拔管成功。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(4):1223-1232. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.103.
2
Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. What We Know and Can Do for Our Patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的骨骼肌功能障碍。我们对其了解多少,又能为患者做些什么。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul 15;198(2):175-186. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2140CI.
3
Driving airway and transpulmonary pressure are correlated to VILI determinants during controlled ventilation.在控制通气期间,驱动气道压和跨肺压与呼吸机所致肺损伤的决定因素相关。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 May;44(5):674-675. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5092-1. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
Mortality in the United States, 2016.美国2016年的死亡率
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Dec(293):1-8.
5
Classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) according to the new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017: Comparison with GOLD 2011.根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议组织(GOLD)2017版对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)进行的分类:与GOLD 2011版的比较。
COPD. 2018 Feb;15(1):21-26. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1394285. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家发病率、患病率以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2016 年 328 种疾病和伤害导致的残疾年数:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
7
Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.全球、地区和国家慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘的死亡、患病率、残疾调整生命年以及与残疾相关的生命年,1990-2015 年:2015 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Sep;5(9):691-706. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Maximum inspiratory pressure as a clinically meaningful trial endpoint for neuromuscular diseases: a comprehensive review of the literature.最大吸气压力作为神经肌肉疾病具有临床意义的试验终点:文献综述
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 16;12(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0598-0.
9
Maximal Inspiratory Pressure: Does the Choice of Reference Values Actually Matter?最大吸气压力:参考值的选择真的重要吗?
Chest. 2017 Jul;152(1):32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.045. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Rehabilitation Protocols, Ventilator Liberation Protocols, and Cuff Leak Tests.美国胸科学会/美国胸科医师学会官方临床实践指南:重症成人机械通气撤离。康复方案、呼吸机撤离方案和气囊漏液试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):120-133. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2075ST.