Clark Jill K, Lowitt Kristen, Levkoe Charles Z, Andrée Peter
John Glenn College of Public Affairs, Ohio State University, 1810 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
School of Environmental Studies, Queen's University, BioSciences Complex, Room 3134, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada.
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(1):175-191. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10146-1. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Dominant food systems, based on industrial methods and corporate control, are in a state of flux. To enable the transition towards more sustainable and just food systems, food movements are claiming new roles in governance. These movements, and the initiatives they spearhead, are associated with a range of labels (e.g., food sovereignty, food justice, and community food security) and use a variety of strategies to enact change. In this paper, we use the concept of relational fields to conduct a post-hoc analysis of nine cases, examining how social movement organizations and other actors actively create new deliberative governance spaces. We argue that successes are related to the "power to convene," a process-oriented approach that increases movements' capacity to mobilize; leverage different types of power; and integrate, coordinate, and build a systems-oriented vision. The power to convene and create deliberative spaces is demonstrated in a variety of contexts and often results in outcomes that further movement aims, including policy change and repositioning food movement actors vis-à-vis others in the field. Our findings suggest that success is not only measured as policy outcomes, but as an advantageous repositioning of social movement actors that enables them to be part of governance processes beyond simple policy advocacy.
基于工业化方法和企业控制的主流食品体系正处于不断变化之中。为了实现向更具可持续性和公平性的食品体系转型,食品运动在治理中发挥着新的作用。这些运动及其牵头的倡议与一系列标签(如粮食主权、粮食正义和社区粮食安全)相关联,并采用多种策略来推动变革。在本文中,我们运用关系场域的概念对九个案例进行事后分析,考察社会运动组织和其他行为主体如何积极创造新的协商治理空间。我们认为,成功与“召集权”相关,这是一种以过程为导向的方法,可提高运动的动员能力;利用不同类型的权力;并整合、协调和构建以系统为导向的愿景。召集权和创造协商空间的能力在各种背景下都有所体现,并且往往会产生推动运动目标实现的结果,包括政策变革以及重新定位食品运动行为主体与该领域其他行为主体的关系。我们的研究结果表明,成功不仅以政策成果来衡量,还包括社会运动行为主体的有利重新定位,使其能够超越简单的政策倡导,参与到治理过程之中。