School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2736-2739. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7197. Epub 2022 May 31.
Lacy-Nichols and Williams provide important new insights into the ongoing contest over policy space and consumer behavior. I attempt to situate these insights in relation to government mandates and governance norms and situate these norms and mandates in the prevailing economic order. This approach is necessary to understand how corporate practices persist and why governments are receptive to the approaches outlined in the analysis conducted by Lacy-Nichols and Williams. This approach can help explain why governments are often receptive to corporations positioning themselves as 'part of the solution'. Governments want strong economies and big food positions itself as contributor to this end. The point I attempt to articulate is that we often conceive of corporate power as , while I suggest that corporate power is rather and a system that is oriented towards profits and economic growth.
拉西-尼科尔斯和威廉姆斯为我们深入了解政策空间和消费者行为的持续博弈提供了重要的新视角。我试图将这些观点置于政府指令和治理规范的背景下,并将这些规范和指令置于当前的经济秩序中。这种方法对于理解企业实践为何持续存在以及政府为何对拉西-尼科尔斯和威廉姆斯的分析中所概述的方法持接受态度是必要的。这种方法可以帮助解释为什么政府通常愿意接受企业将自己定位为“解决方案的一部分”。政府希望拥有强大的经济,而大型食品企业则将自己定位为这一目标的贡献者。我试图阐明的观点是,我们常常将企业权力视为零和博弈,而我则认为,企业权力更像是一种合作关系,一种以利润和经济增长为导向的系统。