Walton Stephanie
Centre for Food Policy, City University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK.
Agric Human Values. 2024;41(3):989-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10535-2. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
Transitioning to food systems that are equitable, resilient, healthy and environmentally sustainable will require the cultivation and diffusion of transformational sociotechnical innovations-and grassroots movements are an essential source of such innovations. Within the literature on strategic niche management, government-provided 'protected spaces' where niche innovations can develop without facing the pressures of the market is an essential part of sustainability transitions. However, because of their desire to rather than food systems, grassroots movements often struggle to acquire such protected spaces and so must determine how and where to generate change whilst being marginalised and exposed to unprotected spaces. The aim of this research is to gain a precise view of the multiple touchpoints of marginalisation that exist across the grassroots-government interface and to apply a new framework for conceptual analysis of these touchpoints that can help to identify where and how grassroots movements might be able to push against this marginalisation. The study finds that, by applying a 'who, what, where' framework of analysis to policies across this interface, it is possible to find pathways forward for achieving small wins towards food systems transformation.
向公平、有韧性、健康且环境可持续的粮食系统转型需要培育和推广变革性的社会技术创新,而基层运动是此类创新的重要来源。在战略利基管理的文献中,政府提供的“保护空间”,即利基创新能够在不受市场压力影响的情况下得以发展的空间,是可持续发展转型的重要组成部分。然而,由于基层运动旨在改变而非维护粮食系统,它们往往难以获得此类保护空间,因此必须确定如何以及在何处产生变革,同时还要面对被边缘化以及处于无保护空间的状况。本研究的目的是精准了解基层与政府界面上存在的多重边缘化接触点,并应用一个新的框架对这些接触点进行概念分析,以帮助确定基层运动能够在何处以及如何抵制这种边缘化。研究发现,通过将“谁、什么、何处”分析框架应用于该界面的各项政策,可以找到实现粮食系统转型小成果的前进路径。