Kulalert Prapasri, Phinyo Phichayut, Patumanond Jayanton, Smathakanee Chutima, Chuenjit Wantida, Nanthapisal Sira
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Aug 25;13:275-283. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S258549. eCollection 2020.
Intermittent nebulization of short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) is the initial treatment of choice for children with asthma exacerbation. However, children with severe asthma exacerbation (SAE) may not show an adequate response and need aggressive stepwise therapy. We aimed to explore factors associated with a poor response to intermittent nebulized SABA in children with SAE.
A retrospective cohort study of children with SAE diagnosed according to the definition of the British Guidelines on the Management of Asthma, who were admitted at Hat Yai Hospital from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. All children were treated with intermittent SABA nebulization. Treatment failure was defined as children needing escalated therapy. Logistic regression with confounding score adjustment was used to explore the predictors of treatment failure.
One hundred thirty-three children were included in the analysis, 59 were in the failure group and 74 were in the success group. After adjusting for potential confounders, they were significantly associated with a previous history of intubation (adjusted OR 6.46, 95% CI 1.13 to 36.79, p=0.036), receiving <3 doses of nebulized salbutamol in the emergency room (ER, aOR 3.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 9.02, p=0.027), ER measured oxygen saturation (SpO) <92% (adjusted OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.18 to 7.75, p=0.022), and exacerbation triggered by pneumonia (adjusted OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.00, p=0.017).
We identified four prognostic factors of treatment failure in children with SAE: a previous history of intubation; receiving <3 doses of nebulized salbutamol in the ER, SpO at ER <92%; and exacerbation triggered by pneumonia. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our findings before clinical implementation.
对于哮喘急性加重期儿童,短效β受体激动剂(SABA)间歇性雾化吸入是首选的初始治疗方法。然而,重度哮喘急性加重期(SAE)儿童可能对治疗反应不佳,需要积极的逐步治疗。我们旨在探讨SAE儿童对间歇性雾化吸入SABA反应不佳的相关因素。
对2015年1月1日至2017年12月31日在合艾医院住院、根据英国哮喘管理指南定义诊断为SAE的儿童进行回顾性队列研究。所有儿童均接受间歇性SABA雾化吸入治疗。治疗失败定义为儿童需要升级治疗。采用经混杂因素评分调整的逻辑回归分析来探讨治疗失败的预测因素。
133名儿童纳入分析,其中59名在失败组,74名在成功组。在调整潜在混杂因素后,治疗失败与既往插管史(调整后比值比6.46,95%置信区间1.13至36.79,p = 0.036)、在急诊室(ER)接受<3剂沙丁胺醇雾化吸入(调整后比值比3.21,95%置信区间1.15至9.02,p = 0.027)、ER测得的血氧饱和度(SpO)<92%(调整后比值比3.02,95%置信区间1.18至7.75,p = 0.022)以及由肺炎引发的急性加重(调整后比值比2.67,95%置信区间1.19至6.00,p = 0.017)显著相关。
我们确定了SAE儿童治疗失败的四个预后因素:既往插管史;在ER接受<3剂沙丁胺醇雾化吸入、ER时SpO<92%;以及由肺炎引发的急性加重。在临床应用之前,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。