Suppr超能文献

联合吸入抗胆碱能药物与短效β2受体激动剂用于儿童急性哮喘的初始治疗。

Combined inhaled anticholinergics and short-acting beta2-agonists for initial treatment of acute asthma in children.

作者信息

Griffiths Benedict, Ducharme Francine M

机构信息

Evelina Chidlren's Hospital, St Thomas? Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK, SE1 7EH.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 21;2013(8):CD000060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000060.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are several treatment options for managing acute asthma exacerbations (sustained worsening of symptoms that do not subside with regular treatment and require a change in management). Guidelines advocate the use of inhaled short acting beta2-agonists (SABAs) in children experiencing an asthma exacerbation. Anticholinergic agents, such as ipratropium bromide and atropine sulfate, have a slower onset of action and weaker bronchodilating effect, but may specifically relieve cholinergic bronchomotor tone and decrease mucosal edema and secretions. Therefore, the combination of inhaled anticholinergics with SABAs may yield enhanced and prolonged bronchodilation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the addition of inhaled anticholinergics to SABAs provides clinical improvement and affects the incidence of adverse effects in children with acute asthma exacerbations.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to April 2000), EMBASE (1980 to April 2000), CINAHL (1982 to April 2000) and reference lists of studies of previous versions of this review. We also contacted drug manufacturers and trialists. For the 2012 review update, we undertook an 'all years' search of the Cochrane Airways Group's register on the 18 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized parallel trials comparing the combination of inhaled anticholinergics and SABAs with SABAs alone in children (aged 18 months to 18 years) with an acute asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used the GRADE rating system to assess the quality of evidence for our primary outcome (hospital admission).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty trials met the review eligibility criteria, generated 24 study comparisons and comprised 2697 randomised children aged one to 18 years, presenting predominantly with moderate or severe exacerbations. Most studies involved both preschool-aged children and school-aged children; three studies also included a small proportion of infants less than 18 months of age. Nine trials (45%) were at a low risk of bias. Most trials used a fixed-dose protocol of three doses of 250 mcg or two doses of 500 mcg of nebulized ipratropium bromide in combination with a SABA over 30 to 90 minutes while three trials used a single dose and two used a flexible-dose protocol according to the need for SABA.The addition of an anticholinergic to a SABA significantly reduced the risk of hospital admission (risk ratio (RR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.85; 15 studies, 2497 children, high-quality evidence). In the group receiving only SABAs, 23 out of 100 children with acute asthma were admitted to hospital compared with 17 (95% CI 15 to 20) out of 100 children treated with SABAs plus anticholinergics. This represents an overall number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 16 (95% CI 12 to 29).Trends towards a greater effect with increased treatment intensity and with increased asthma severity were observed, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no effect modification due to concomitant use of oral corticosteroids and the effect of age could not be explored. However, exclusion of the one trial that included infants (< 18 months) and contributed data to the main outcome, did not affect the results. Statistically significant group differences favoring anticholinergic use were observed for lung function, clinical score at 120 minutes, oxygen saturation at 60 minutes, and the need for repeat use of bronchodilators prior to discharge from the emergency department. No significant group difference was seen in relapse rates.Fewer children treated with anticholinergics plus SABA reported nausea and tremor compared with SABA alone; no significant group difference was observed for vomiting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Children with an asthma exacerbation experience a lower risk of admission to hospital if they are treated with the combination of inhaled SABAs plus anticholinergic versus SABA alone. They also experience a greater improvement in lung function and less risk of nausea and tremor. Within this group, the findings suggested, but did not prove, the possibility of an effect modification, where intensity of anticholinergic treatment and asthma severity, could be associated with greater benefit.Further research is required to identify the characteristics of children that may benefit from anticholinergic use (e.g. age and asthma severity including mild exacerbation and impending respiratory failure) and the treatment modalities (dose, intensity, and duration) associated with most benefit from anticholinergic use better.

摘要

背景

对于急性哮喘加重期(症状持续恶化,常规治疗无法缓解且需改变治疗方案)有多种治疗选择。指南提倡在哮喘加重期的儿童中使用吸入性短效β2受体激动剂(SABAs)。抗胆碱能药物,如异丙托溴铵和硫酸阿托品,起效较慢且支气管舒张作用较弱,但可特异性缓解胆碱能支气管运动张力并减轻黏膜水肿和分泌物。因此,吸入性抗胆碱能药物与SABAs联合使用可能会增强并延长支气管舒张作用。

目的

确定在SABAs基础上加用吸入性抗胆碱能药物是否能改善急性哮喘加重期儿童的临床症状并影响不良反应的发生率。

检索方法

我们检索了MEDLINE(1966年至2000年4月)、EMBASE(1980年至2000年4月)、CINAHL(1982年至2000年4月)以及本综述先前版本的研究参考文献列表。我们还联系了药品制造商和试验者。对于2012年的综述更新,我们于2012年4月18日对Cochrane Airways Group注册库进行了“全年”检索。

入选标准

随机平行试验,比较吸入性抗胆碱能药物与SABAs联合使用和单独使用SABAs对18个月至18岁急性哮喘加重期儿童的疗效。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们使用GRADE评级系统评估主要结局(住院)的证据质量。

主要结果

20项试验符合综述纳入标准,产生了24项研究比较,纳入了2697名1至18岁的随机分组儿童,主要表现为中度或重度加重。大多数研究涉及学龄前儿童和学龄儿童;三项研究还纳入了一小部分小于18个月的婴儿。9项试验(45%)偏倚风险较低。大多数试验采用固定剂量方案,在30至90分钟内给予三剂250 mcg或两剂500 mcg雾化异丙托溴铵与SABAs联合使用,而三项试验采用单剂量,两项试验根据SABA的需求采用灵活剂量方案。在SABAs基础上加用抗胆碱能药物显著降低了住院风险(风险比(RR)0.73;95%置信区间(CI)0.63至0.85;15项研究,2497名儿童,高质量证据)。在仅接受SABAs治疗的组中,100名急性哮喘儿童中有23名住院,而在接受SABAs加抗胆碱能药物治疗的100名儿童中,有17名(95%CI 15至20)住院。这意味着为获得额外有益结局所需治疗的总人数(NNTB)为16(95%CI 12至29)。观察到随着治疗强度增加和哮喘严重程度增加有更大疗效的趋势,但未达到统计学意义。由于同时使用口服糖皮质激素未观察到效应修饰,且无法探讨年龄的影响。然而,排除纳入了婴儿(<18个月)且为主要结局贡献数据的一项试验,并未影响结果。在肺功能、120分钟时的临床评分、60分钟时的血氧饱和度以及急诊出院前重复使用支气管舒张剂的需求方面,观察到支持使用抗胆碱能药物的统计学显著组间差异。复发率方面未观察到显著组间差异。与单独使用SABAs相比,接受抗胆碱能药物加SABAs治疗的儿童报告恶心和震颤的较少;呕吐方面未观察到显著组间差异。

作者结论

与单独使用SABAs相比,哮喘加重期儿童接受吸入性SABAs加抗胆碱能药物联合治疗时住院风险较低。他们的肺功能也有更大改善,恶心和震颤的风险更低。在该组中,研究结果提示但未证实存在效应修饰的可能性,即抗胆碱能治疗强度和哮喘严重程度可能与更大益处相关。需要进一步研究以更好地确定可能从抗胆碱能药物使用中获益的儿童特征(如年龄和哮喘严重程度,包括轻度加重和即将发生的呼吸衰竭)以及与抗胆碱能药物使用最有益相关的治疗方式(剂量、强度和持续时间)。

相似文献

2
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.
7
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub5.
8
Anticholinergic therapy for acute asthma in children.儿童急性哮喘的抗胆碱能治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003797.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Contemporary Approach to the Treatment of Perioperative Bronchospasm.围手术期支气管痉挛治疗的现代方法
Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2020;7(2):190-198. doi: 10.31480/2330-4871/112. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
4
GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.GEMA 5.3. 《西班牙哮喘管理指南》。
Open Respir Arch. 2023 Sep 19;5(4):100277. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Paediatrics: how to manage acute asthma exacerbations.儿科学:如何处理急性哮喘发作
Drugs Context. 2021 May 26;10. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-12-7. eCollection 2021.
9
[Paediatric Life Support].[儿科生命支持]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):650-719. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00887-9. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Review of aerosol delivery in the emergency department.急诊科气溶胶给药的综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):591. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4724.

本文引用的文献

2
Anticholinergic therapy for acute asthma in children.儿童急性哮喘的抗胆碱能治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003797.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验