• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术术后的功能演变:32例早期评估

Functional Evolution after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy, an Earlier Evaluation of 32 Cases.

作者信息

Aprile Bruno César, Amato Marcelo Campos Moraes, de Oliveira Cézar Augusto

机构信息

Departamento de Coluna, Clínica SOU, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Departamento de Coluna, Instituto Amato, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Aug;55(4):415-418. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402473. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-3402473
PMID:32904845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7458753/
Abstract

To determine time period for hospital discharge and pain and function improvement in patients submitted to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).  Retrospective evaluation of length of stay and visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Roland-Morris questionnaire results in 32 patients undergoing PELD at the preoperative period and at 2 days and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 postoperative weeks.  All patients were discharged in less than 6 hours. There was a statistically significant improvement between the results obtained before the procedure and 2 days postsurgery: the mean VAS for axial pain went from 6.63 to 3.31, the VAS for irradiated pain went from 6.66 to 2.75, the Oswestry score went from 44.59 to 33.17%, and the Roland-Morris score went from 14.03 to 10.34. This difference progressively improved up to 12 weeks in all questionnaires. Regarding the Oswestry score, minimum disability values (19.39%) were observed at 6 weeks.  All 32 patients were discharged within 6 hours. Pain and function improved significantly after 48 hours, with further significant and progressive improvement until the 3 month.

摘要

确定接受经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)患者的出院时间以及疼痛和功能改善情况。 回顾性评估32例接受PELD患者术前、术后2天以及术后1、2、4、6和12周的住院时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和罗兰-莫里斯问卷结果。 所有患者均在6小时内出院。手术前与术后2天的结果相比有统计学意义的改善:轴向疼痛的平均VAS从6.63降至3.31,放射痛的VAS从6.66降至2.75,Oswestry评分从44.59%降至33.17%,罗兰-莫里斯评分从14.03降至10.34。所有问卷中的这种差异在12周时逐渐改善。关于Oswestry评分,在6周时观察到最低功能障碍值(19.39%)。 32例患者均在6小时内出院。48小时后疼痛和功能有显著改善,直至3个月时进一步显著且逐渐改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/ee3ecc6f122d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/cd6496ae0697/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/c6dcc97a6c66/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/82068821433d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/9f4745ca665d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/a533439e9b43/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/ee3ecc6f122d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/cd6496ae0697/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/c6dcc97a6c66/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/82068821433d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/9f4745ca665d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/a533439e9b43/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8022/7458753/ee3ecc6f122d/10-1055-s-0039-3402473-i1900097pt-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional Evolution after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy, an Earlier Evaluation of 32 Cases.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术术后的功能演变:32例早期评估
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Aug;55(4):415-418. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402473. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Perioperative Epidural Steroids After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症围手术期硬膜外类固醇激素的比较结果:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e244-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.122. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation as day surgery - short-term clinical results of 235 consecutive cases.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症作为日间手术——235例连续病例的短期临床结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(49):e18064. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018064.
6
Cocktail Treatment with a Gelatin Sponge Impregnated with Ropivacaine, Dexamethasone, and Vitamin B12 Promotes Early Postoperative Recovery after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Retrospective, Case-Controlled Study.鸡尾酒疗法用含有罗哌卡因、地塞米松和维生素 B12 的明胶海绵促进经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术的术后早期恢复:一项回顾性、病例对照研究。
Pain Physician. 2020 Mar;23(2):E211-E218.
7
Modified Percutaneous Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Instrument Design, Technique Notes, and 5 Years Follow-up.改良经皮腰椎椎间孔成形术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:器械设计、技术要点及5年随访
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E85-E98.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与后路开放式腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
A retrospective study of epidural and intravenous steroids after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for large lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗大型腰椎间盘突出症后硬膜外和静脉注射类固醇的回顾性研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Feb;20(1):34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.10.003. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy as an Alternative to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术作为大型腰椎间盘突出症开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的替代方法
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E291-300.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of early functional outcome of lumbar discectomy in Soba and Future hospitals, Khartoum, Sudan 2021.2021年苏丹喀土穆索巴医院和未来医院腰椎间盘切除术早期功能结果评估
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Nov 17;84:104866. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104866. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
The Thermosensitive Injectable Celecoxib-Loaded Chitosan Hydrogel for Repairing Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Defect.用于修复术后椎间盘缺损的热敏性可注射塞来昔布负载壳聚糖水凝胶
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 28;10:876157. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.876157. eCollection 2022.
3
Full Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy: Is the Interlaminar Approach an Alternative to the Transforaminal Approach? A Technical Note.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (TPED) for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study - early results.经椎间孔后路腰椎间盘突出症经皮内镜下椎间盘切除术(TPED)后的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究——早期结果
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1311-1317. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169702.
2
Comparison of 7 Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis.比较 7 种腰椎间盘突出症手术干预方法:一项网络荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):E863-E871.
3
Short-Term Outcome Comparison Between Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Approach and Open Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Technique for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.
全内镜下胸椎椎间盘切除术:椎板间入路能否替代经椎间孔入路?技术说明
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):309-317. doi: 10.14444/8209.
全内镜椎间孔入路与开放微创显微外科技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的短期疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:894-900.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.165. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Full-endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic and open discectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.全内镜与微内镜及开放椎间盘切除术:结局与并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Nov;33:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:Meta 分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
Full-Endoscopic Procedures Versus Traditional Discectomy Surgery for Discectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Global Clinical Trials.全内镜手术与传统椎间盘切除术治疗椎间盘突出症的比较:当前全球临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):103-18.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy as an Alternative to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术作为大型腰椎间盘突出症开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的替代方法
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E291-300.
9
Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Young Adults: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗年轻成年人的疗效比较:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.047. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
10
Full-Endoscopic Technique Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.全内镜技术椎间盘切除术与显微内镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究
Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):359-63.