Diaz Ruben Marcelo Maldonado, Rezende Fernando Cury, Moscon Antonio Carlos, Franciozi Carlos Eduardo da Silveira, Martimbianco Ana Luiza Cabrera, Duarte Aires
Grupo do Joelho da Ortocity, SP, Brasil.
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Aug;55(4):432-437. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402461. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
To analyze the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with remnant-preserving versus remnant-resecting technique, concerning the return to pre-lesion activity level. The present retrospective cohort study has assessed adults > 18 years old who underwent ACL anatomical reconstruction between 2010 and 2014. The main outcomes assessed were: level of physical activity (4-point scale), sports participation rate, ACL rerupture defined as documented lesion requiring revision surgery and the numeric pain scale rate (NPSR). A total of 83 individuals were included in the study, with a mean age of 31.8 years old and follow-up mean time of 4.2 years after the surgery. A total of 34 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with remnant-preserving technique, and 49 without remnant preservation. No statistically significant difference was found between groups in all outcomes assessed: level of physical activity before the lesion and after the surgery, ACL rerupture rates and postoperative pain level. Subgroup analysis has shown a statistically significant decrease in the activity level in both groups. The most practiced sport was football; 72% of patients in the remnant group have resumed football activity versus 52.6% of the control group. Based in these findings, the comparison between ACL reconstruction with remnant preserving technique and remnant resecting technique has shown no differences concerning the return to prelesion activity level.
为分析保留残端与切除残端技术在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的结果,涉及恢复至损伤前活动水平的情况。 本回顾性队列研究评估了2010年至2014年间接受ACL解剖重建的18岁以上成年人。评估的主要结果包括:身体活动水平(4分制)、运动参与率、定义为需要翻修手术的记录损伤的ACL再破裂以及数字疼痛量表评分率(NPSR)。 共有83人纳入研究,平均年龄31.8岁,术后平均随访时间4.2年。共有34例患者采用保留残端技术进行ACL重建,49例未保留残端。在所有评估结果中,两组之间未发现统计学显著差异:损伤前和手术后的身体活动水平、ACL再破裂率和术后疼痛水平。亚组分析显示两组的活动水平均有统计学显著下降。最常进行的运动是足球;保留残端组72%的患者恢复了足球活动,而对照组为52.6%。 基于这些发现,保留残端技术与切除残端技术在ACL重建中恢复至损伤前活动水平方面未显示出差异。