• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低蛋白血症对直接和间接离子选择电极法测定电解质的影响。

Effect of Hypoproteinemia on Electrolyte Measurement by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Methods.

作者信息

Gohel Mukesh, Makadia Jemil S, Chakrabarti Chandan

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jun;13(2):144-147. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730821. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1730821
PMID:34483560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8409126/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to see the effect of hypoproteinemia on electrolyte measurement by two different techniques, that is, direct ion selective electrode (ISE) and indirect ISE.  It was an observational study in which 90 serum samples with normal protein content (Group-1) were subjected to sodium (Na ) and potassium (K ) measurements by direct and indirect ISE methods. In the same way, 90 serum samples with total protein < 5 g/dL (Group-2) were subjected to Na and K measurements by direct and indirect ISE methods.  In samples from Group-1 patients, average Na was 138.1 ± 4.764 mmol/L by direct ISE method and 139.3 ± 3.887 mmol/L by indirect ISE method while average K was 4.41 ± 0.644 mmol/L by direct ISE method and 4.40 ± 0.592 mmol/L by indirect ISE method. There was no statistically significant difference in Na and K values measured by different methods. In samples from Group-2 patients, measured value of Na by direct ISE and indirect ISE was 134.57 ± 5.520 mmol/L and 138.64 ± 5.401 mmol/L, respectively. Difference between these two values was statistically significant with -value of < 0.0001, but direct ISE and indirect ISE measured values of K was 4.146 ± 0.9639 mmol/L and 4.186 ± 0.8989, respectively, with no significant difference.  Direct and indirect ISE methods are not comparable and showing significantly different results for Na in case of hypoproteinemia. So, it is recommended that setups like intensive care unit or emergency department, where electrolyte values have significant treatment outcome, should follow direct ISE method and should compare its previous result with the same method. Both the methods should not be used interchangeably.

摘要

本研究的目的是观察低蛋白血症对两种不同技术(即直接离子选择性电极法(ISE)和间接ISE法)测定电解质的影响。

这是一项观察性研究,对90份蛋白质含量正常的血清样本(第1组)采用直接和间接ISE法进行钠(Na⁺)和钾(K⁺)测定。同样,对90份总蛋白<5g/dL的血清样本(第2组)采用直接和间接ISE法进行Na⁺和K⁺测定。

在第1组患者的样本中,直接ISE法测定的平均Na⁺为138.1±4.764mmol/L,间接ISE法测定的平均Na⁺为139.3±3.887mmol/L;直接ISE法测定的平均K⁺为4.41±0.644mmol/L,间接ISE法测定的平均K⁺为4.40±0.592mmol/L。不同方法测定的Na⁺和K⁺值无统计学显著差异。在第2组患者的样本中,直接ISE法和间接ISE法测定的Na⁺值分别为134.57±5.520mmol/L和138.64±5.401mmol/L。这两个值之间的差异具有统计学显著性,P值<0.0001,但直接ISE法和间接ISE法测定的K⁺值分别为4.146±0.9639mmol/L和4.186±0.8989,无显著差异。

直接和间接ISE法不可比,在低蛋白血症情况下,二者测定Na⁺的结果有显著差异。因此,建议在重症监护病房或急诊科等电解质值对治疗结果有重大影响的科室,应采用直接ISE法,并将其先前的结果与同一方法进行比较。两种方法不应交替使用。

相似文献

1
Effect of Hypoproteinemia on Electrolyte Measurement by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Methods.低蛋白血症对直接和间接离子选择电极法测定电解质的影响。
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jun;13(2):144-147. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730821. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
Prevalence of Clinically Significant Differences in Sodium Measurements Due to Abnormal Protein Concentrations Using an Indirect Ion-Selective Electrode Method.使用间接离子选择电极法时,因蛋白质浓度异常导致钠测量值出现具有临床意义差异的患病率。
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Nov;4(3):427-432. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028720. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Increasing Glucose Concentrations Interfere with Estimation of Electrolytes by Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Method.葡萄糖浓度升高会干扰间接离子选择电极法对电解质的测定。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2016 Apr;31(2):224-230. doi: 10.1007/s12291-015-0522-0. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
4
Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital.离子选择性电极直接法与间接法测量钠离子的差异:三级转诊医院的问题评估。
J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):326.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
The challenges of sodium measurements: indirect versus direct ion-selective method.钠测量的挑战:间接与直接离子选择性方法。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2019 Aug;181(2):193-199. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0101.
6
Plasma sodium measurements by direct ion selective methods in laboratory and point of care may not be clinically interchangeable.在实验室和即时检测中,通过直接离子选择法测量血浆钠的结果在临床上可能无法互换。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Oct;31(5):1103-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9938-1. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Sweat Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride Concentrations Analyzed Same Day as Collection Versus After 7 Days Storage in a Range of Temperatures.汗液中钠、钾和氯化物浓度在采集当天与在一系列温度下储存7天后进行分析的对比。
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2018 May 1;28(3):238-245. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0199. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients.低血清总蛋白对危重症患者离子选择电极法测定钠和钾的影响
Br J Biomed Sci. 2008;65(3):128-31. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2008.11732815.
9
Evaluation of the analytical performance of a portable ion-selective electrode meter for measuring whole-blood, plasma, milk, abomasal-fluid, and urine sodium concentrations in cattle.评估一种便携式离子选择性电极仪测量牛全血、血浆、牛奶、皱胃液和尿液中钠离子浓度的分析性能。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7435-7444. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16198. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
Reference Intervals of Serum Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine in Chinese Han Population and Comparison of Two ISE Methods.中国汉族人群血清钠、钾、氯参考区间及两种离子选择电极法的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2015 May;29(3):226-34. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21755. Epub 2014 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
[Direct and indirect ion selective electrodes methods: the differences specified through a case of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia].[直接和间接离子选择性电极法:通过一例华氏巨球蛋白血症病例阐述的差异]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2015 May-Jun;73(3):345-52. doi: 10.1684/abc.2015.1046.
2
Spurious electrolyte disorders: a diagnostic challenge for clinicians.假性电解质紊乱:临床医生面临的诊断挑战。
Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(1):50-7. doi: 10.1159/000351804. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital.
离子选择性电极直接法与间接法测量钠离子的差异:三级转诊医院的问题评估。
J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):326.e9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
4
Pseudohyponatremia revisited: a modern-day pitfall.重新审视假性低钠血症:一种现代陷阱。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Apr;135(4):516-9. doi: 10.5858/2010-0018-RS.1.
5
Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes.即时检验血气分析仪与实验室自动分析仪在电解质测量方面的比较。
Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb 24;2(2):117-20. doi: 10.1007/s12245-009-0091-1.
6
Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients.低血清总蛋白对危重症患者离子选择电极法测定钠和钾的影响
Br J Biomed Sci. 2008;65(3):128-31. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2008.11732815.
7
Relationship of the absolute difference between direct and indirect ion selective electrode measurement of serum sodium and the total protein concentration.
J Clin Pathol. 2008 May;61(5):645-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050872.
8
Sodium measurements in multiple myeloma: two techniques compared.
Clin Chem. 1982 Dec;28(12):2383-6.