Tahir Muhammad, Chaudhry Ejaz Ali, Zaffar Zain, Anwar Kashif, Mamoon Muhammad Ameer Hamza, Ahmad Muhammad, Jamali Allah Rakhio, Mehboob Ghulam
Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Medical College, Mirpur Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):429-439. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0315.R1. eCollection 2020 Jul.
We hypothesized that the wide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique is cost-effective, easy to use, safe, and reproducible, with a low learning curve towards mastery, having a high patient satisfaction rate. Furthermore, WALANT would be a suitable alternative for the austere and developing nation environments where lack of funds and resources are a common issue.
This was a randomized control trial of 169 patients who required surgery for closed isolated distal radius fractures. The study was performed between March 2016 and April 2019 at a public sector level 1 trauma centre. General anaesthesia was used in 56 patients, Bier's block in 58 patients, and WALANT in 55 patients. Data were collected on pre-, peri-, and postoperative parameters, clinical outcome, hospital costs, and patient satisfaction. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with a p-value of 0.05 being significant.
Operations with WALANT proceeded sooner, and patients recovered faster, resulting in mean fewer missed working days (7.8 (SD 1.67)) compared with general anaesthesia (20.1 (SD 7.37)) or Bier's block (14.1 (SD 7.65)) (p < 0.001). The WALANT patients did not develop complications, while the other patients did (p < 0.04). Clinical outcomes did not differ, nor did surgeon qualification affect clinical outcomes. Mean hospital costs were lower for WALANT ($428.50 (SD 77.71)) than for general anaesthesia ($630.63 (SD 114.77)) or Bier's block ($734.00 (SD 37.54)) (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher (p < 0.001).
WALANT for distal radius fractures results in a faster recovery, is more cost-effective, has similar clinical outcomes, and has fewer complications than general anaesthesia or Bier's block. This makes WALANT an attractive technique in any setting, but especially in middle- and low-income countries.Cite this article: 2020;9(7):429-439.
我们假设清醒局部麻醉无止血带(WALANT)技术具有成本效益、易于使用、安全且可重复,掌握该技术的学习曲线较低,患者满意度高。此外,WALANT对于资金和资源匮乏这一常见问题的严峻和发展中国家环境而言,将是一种合适的替代方法。
这是一项针对169例闭合性单纯桡骨远端骨折需要手术治疗患者的随机对照试验。该研究于2016年3月至2019年4月在一家公共部门一级创伤中心进行。56例患者采用全身麻醉,58例患者采用 Bier 阻滞,55例患者采用WALANT。收集术前、术中和术后参数、临床结果、医院成本及患者满意度的数据。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),p值<0.05具有统计学意义。
与全身麻醉(20.1(标准差7.37))或Bier阻滞(14.1(标准差7.65))相比,采用WALANT进行手术的时间更早,患者恢复更快,平均误工天数更少(7.8(标准差1.67))(p<0.001)。WALANT组患者未出现并发症,而其他组患者出现了并发症(p<0.04)。临床结果无差异,外科医生资质也未影响临床结果。WALANT的平均住院费用(428.50美元(标准差77.71))低于全身麻醉(630.63美元(标准差114.77))或Bier阻滞(734.00美元(标准差37.54))(p<0.001)。患者满意度也更高(p<0.001)。
对于桡骨远端骨折,WALANT比全身麻醉或Bier阻滞恢复更快、更具成本效益、临床结果相似且并发症更少。这使得WALANT在任何环境中都是一种有吸引力的技术,尤其是在中低收入国家。引用本文:2020;9(7):429 - 439。