Suppr超能文献

编码顺序可预测幼儿对排序问题的反应。

Order of Encoding Predicts Young Children's Responses to Sequencing Questions.

作者信息

Klemfuss J Zoe, McWilliams Kelly, Henderson Hayden M, Olaguez Alma P, Lyon Thomas D

机构信息

University of California, Irvine.

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.

出版信息

Cogn Dev. 2020 Jul-Sep;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100927. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

Abstract

We propose that young children exhibit an bias, such that they are inclined to report or act out events in the order in which they were originally encoded. This bias helps to explain why children assume that events they first hear described are in chronological order and why they often appear to understand "after" better than "before" when they are questioned about experienced events. Asking children about a sequence of events as a whole (in particular using "first") could avoid order of encoding biases, because children would not have to answer questions about events within the sequence. In the present study, 100 2- to 4-year-old children participated in creating simple stories in which a story child interacted with five objects, thus creating five unrelated events. Children then responded to questions asking them to identify which action occurred "before" and "after" the third event and which action occurred "first" and "last" in the story. We hypothesized that (1) children would exhibit a tendency to answer "before" and "after" questions with the event that occurred after the queried event, thus impairing performance on "before" questions; (2) children would respond more accurately to questions about what occurred "first" and "last" than to questions about "before" and "after"; (3) children would respond more accurately to questions about "first" than questions about "last," and (4) children's performance would improve with age. The hypotheses were supported. Critically, children's errors when responding to "before"/ "after" questions were consistent with an order of encoding bias.

摘要

我们提出,幼儿表现出一种偏向,即他们倾向于按照事件最初被编码的顺序来报告或描述事件。这种偏向有助于解释为什么儿童认为他们最初听到描述的事件是按时间顺序排列的,以及为什么当他们被问及经历过的事件时,他们似乎往往对“之后”的理解比对“之前”的理解更好。整体询问儿童一系列事件(特别是使用“首先”)可以避免编码顺序偏向,因为儿童不必回答关于序列中事件的问题。在本研究中,100名2至4岁的儿童参与创作简单的故事,故事中的一个孩子与五个物体互动,从而产生五个不相关的事件。然后,儿童回答问题,要求他们确定在第三个事件“之前”和“之后”发生了哪些动作,以及在故事中哪些动作发生在“首先”和“最后”。我们假设:(1)儿童在回答“之前”和“之后”的问题时,会倾向于回答在被询问事件之后发生的事件,从而影响他们在“之前”问题上的表现;(2)儿童对关于“首先”和“最后”发生了什么的问题的回答会比关于“之前”和“之后”的问题更准确;(3)儿童对关于“首先”的问题的回答会比对关于“最后”的问题更准确;(4)儿童的表现会随着年龄的增长而提高。这些假设得到了支持。至关重要的是,儿童在回答“之前”/“之后”问题时的错误与编码顺序偏向是一致的。

相似文献

2
Children's accuracy in answering Why and How Come questions.儿童回答“为什么”和“怎么会这样”问题的准确性。
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 May;45(3):238-243. doi: 10.1177/0165025420979364. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

本文引用的文献

9
Contrasting patterns in the acquisition of spatial/temporal terms.空间/时间术语习得中的对比模式。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1981 Dec;32(3):485-512. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(81)90110-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验