Suppr超能文献

基于计算机断层扫描的心脏骤停幸存者不同复苏方法与损伤模式的比较。

Comparison of different resuscitation methods with regard to injury patterns in cardiac arrest survivors based on computer tomography.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Marburg University Hospital, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Marburg University Hospital, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109244. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109244. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To ensure that patients survive cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is needed. However, the procedure itself can lead to severe injuries. This study aims to examine both possibilities of resuscitation - mechanical or manual - with regard to their risk of injury. To this end, we compare the injuries patterns in both groups of patients after successful resuscitation based on computer tomography (CT).

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included 32 patients (female: 21.87 %, male: 78.12 %, Mean age: 60.22 ± 13.93 years) with cardiac arrest followed by successful mechanical CPR, who underwent an early whole-body CT. A control group of 32 patients (female: 21.87 %, male: 78.12 %, mean age: 60.75 ± 13.34 years) that had been resuscitated successfully with manual CPR was matched according to gender and age for a better statistical comparison. Patients with cardiac arrest due to trauma were excluded from the study population.

RESULTS

Mechanically resuscitated patients showed significantly more CPR-related injuries than those who were resuscitated manually (100 % vs. 84.37 %; p = 0.02). In particular, dislocated rib fractures (40.47 vs. 23.80 mean rank, p < 0.01), sternal fractures (74.19 % vs. 25 %; p < 0,01), bleeding complications (29.03 % vs. 3.12 %; p = 0.01), pneumothorax (38.71 % vs. 9.37 %; p = 0.01), mediastinal haematomas (58.01 % vs. 25 %, p = 0.01) and liver lacerations (29.03 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.04) were observed significantly more in patients after mechanical CPR compared to those with manual resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline-based use of mechanical CPR results in a significant increase of internal and musculoskeletal injuries compared to manual CPR.

摘要

目的

为了确保患者在心脏骤停后能够存活,需要进行心肺复苏(CPR)。然而,该程序本身可能会导致严重的伤害。本研究旨在检查机械或手动复苏的两种可能性,以及它们的受伤风险。为此,我们根据计算机断层扫描(CT)比较了两组成功复苏患者的损伤模式。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 32 名(女性:21.87%,男性:78.12%,平均年龄:60.22±13.93 岁)因心脏骤停而接受成功机械性 CPR 并进行早期全身 CT 的患者。根据性别和年龄匹配了 32 名(女性:21.87%,男性:78.12%,平均年龄:60.75±13.34 岁)接受成功手动 CPR 复苏的患者作为对照组,以便更好地进行统计学比较。排除因创伤导致心脏骤停的患者。

结果

机械性复苏患者的 CPR 相关损伤明显多于手动复苏患者(100%比 84.37%;p=0.02)。特别是,肋骨错位骨折(40.47 比 23.80 平均秩,p<0.01)、胸骨骨折(74.19%比 25%;p<0.01)、出血并发症(29.03%比 3.12%;p=0.01)、气胸(38.71%比 9.37%;p=0.01)、纵隔血肿(58.01%比 25%;p=0.01)和肝裂伤(29.03%比 0%;p=0.04)在机械性 CPR 后患者中明显更为常见。

结论

与手动 CPR 相比,基于指南使用机械性 CPR 会导致内部和肌肉骨骼损伤显著增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验