Suppr超能文献

深入探讨血浆置换在多发性硬化症中的应用:弊端

A closer look at plasmapheresis in multiple sclerosis: the cons.

作者信息

Tindall R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Southwestern Medical School, UTHSCD, Dallas, TX 75235.

出版信息

Neurology. 1988 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):53-6.

PMID:3290716
Abstract

Plasmapheresis has been associated with clinical benefit in autoimmune disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis, and this has generated interest in its use in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, clinical trials of plasmapheresis in MS have shown little or no benefit from this intervention. The rationale for using plasmapheresis is the removal of an autoimmune antibody from the circulation. However, this approach relies on the assumption that a pathologic autoantibody is present in the vascular compartment and is in transit to the CNS to sites of MS plaques. In addition, for plasmapheresis to be an expedient therapy, it is essential that the target organ recover its biologic function rapidly following removal of circulating autoantibody. Our own study results and the findings of others have indicated that the cost-benefit ratio of plasmapheresis does not favor its use in patients with MS, alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive therapy. Very little sustained clinical benefit attributable to plasmapheresis has been observed.

摘要

血浆置换已被证明在格林-巴利综合征和重症肌无力等自身免疫性疾病中具有临床益处,这引发了人们对其在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中应用的兴趣。然而,MS患者血浆置换的临床试验显示,这种干预措施几乎没有益处或根本没有益处。使用血浆置换的理论依据是从循环中去除自身免疫抗体。然而,这种方法基于这样一种假设,即病理性自身抗体存在于血管腔中,并正在向中枢神经系统的MS斑块部位转运。此外,要使血浆置换成为一种便捷的治疗方法,至关重要的是在去除循环自身抗体后,靶器官能迅速恢复其生物学功能。我们自己的研究结果以及其他研究结果表明,血浆置换的成本效益比不支持其单独或与其他免疫抑制疗法联合用于MS患者。几乎未观察到血浆置换带来的持续临床益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验